UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 


 

FORM 8-K

 

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported):   February 7, 2011

 

HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

State of Incorporation:   Delaware

 

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-4221

 

Internal Revenue Service – Employer Identification No.  73-0679879

 

1437 South Boulder Avenue, Suite 1400, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119

(918)742-5531

 


 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

 

o             Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

o             Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

o             Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

o             Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 

 

 



 

ITEM 7.01             REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE

 

Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (“H&P”) will deliver an investor and securities analyst presentation that includes the slides attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K, which are incorporated herein by reference.

 

This information is not “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing made pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  The furnishing of these slides is not intended to constitute a representation that such information is required by Regulation FD or that the materials they contain include material information that is not otherwise publicly available.

 

ITEM 9.01             FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

 

 

 

99.1

 

Slides to be shown during an investor and securities analyst presentation.

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly authorized the undersigned to sign this report on its behalf.

 

 

 

HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC.

 

(Registrant)

 

 

 

/S/ Steven R. Mackey

 

Steven R. Mackey

 

Executive Vice President

 

 

 

DATE: February 7, 2011

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

 

 

 

99.1

 

Slides to be shown during an investor and securities analyst presentation.

 

2


Exhibit 99.1

 

GRAPHIC

Investor Relations Contact: Mike Drickamer – (918) 588-5190 – mike.drickamer@hpinc.com Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Credit Suisse Energy Summit 2011 February 8-9, 2011

 


GRAPHIC

Statements within this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. For information regarding risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s business, please refer to the “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” sections of the Company’s SEC filings, including but not limited to, its annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. As a result of these factors, Helmerich & Payne, Inc.’s actual results may differ materially from those indicated or implied by such forward-looking statements. We undertake no duty to update or revise our forward-looking statements based on changes in internal estimates, expectations or otherwise.

 


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 H&P’s Global Rig Fleet (as of 2/8/11) * Includes 13 new FlexRigs with customer commitments scheduled for completion during calendar 2011. ** Includes 10 active FlexRigs. An additional FlexRig will be deployed from the U.S. to Bahrain during the third fiscal quarter of 2011. International Land ** 23 Offshore 9 Mobile & Conventional 38 U.S. FlexRigs * 211 U.S. Land * 249 281 Total Rigs (Includes New Build Commitments)

 


GRAPHIC

 H&P’s Global Rig Fleet * Estimates include existing rigs and announced new build commitments. 77 90 89 88 96 111 127 130 128 151 193 224 254 257 279 281 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011E* 2012E* Rigs Available Fiscal Year (Ending Sept 30) International Land Offshore U.S. Land

 


GRAPHIC

H&P’s Growing Exposure to Oil and Liquids Estimated proportion of H&P’s active U.S. Land rigs in markets primarily associated with oil, liquids rich gas, and dry gas. Oil Liquids Rich Gas Dry Gas

 


GRAPHIC

Oil Related Drilling Increasingly Complex 39% 31% 33% 40% 41% 53% 56% 42% 41% 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Feb-11 Peak (2008) Trough (2009) Number of Active Rigs (Smith Bits S.T.A.T.S.) Annual Average During Each Prior Year Active Rigs in U.S. Land Drilling for Oil Horizontal or Directional Drilling Vertical Drilling

 


GRAPHIC

H&P is Leading the U.S. Land New Build Effort Refurbished rigs, built between 1940s and 1982 72% 12% 16% 16% 77% 7% Note: The above estimates corresponding to the total available U.S. fleet are derived from multiple sources including Rig Data, Smith Bits and corporate filings. Only rigs with equal to or greater than 600 horsepower drawworks ratings are considered. AC Driven New Builds Other New Builds Conventional Rigs Total Available U.S. Land Fleet (Estimates) (~2,500 Rigs) AC Driven (FlexRig 3 & 4) Other New Builds (FlexRig 1 & 2) Conventional Rigs H&P's Available U.S. Land Fleet (236 Rigs as of 2/8/11)

 


GRAPHIC

H&P and U.S. Land Fleet (by Rig Type) 53% 31% 16% 20% 76% Note: The above estimates corresponding to the total available U.S. land fleet are derived from multiple sources including Rig Data, Smith Bits and corporate filings. Only rigs with equal to or greater than 600 horsepower drawworks ratings are considered. AC Driven Rigs SCR Rigs Mechanical Rigs H&P's Available U.S. Land Fleet (236 Rigs as of 2/8/11) AC Driven Rigs SCR Rigs Mechanical Rigs Total Available U.S. Land Fleet (Estimates) (~2,500 Rigs)

 


GRAPHIC

H&P’s U.S. Land Fleet (as of 2/8/11) E&P Companies Prefer AC Driven Rigs The above estimates corresponding to the total available U.S. land fleet are derived from multiple sources including Rig Data, Smith Bits and corporate filings. Only rigs with equal to or greater than 600 horsepower drawworks ratings are considered. Industry’s Estimated U.S. Land Fleet* * Composition & Utilization (by Rig Type) Composition & Utilization (by Rig Type) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% AC Driven Rigs SCR Rigs Mechanical Rigs Utilization (%) Fleet Composition (%) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% AC Driven Rigs SCR Rigs Mechanical Rigs Estimated Utilization (%)* Estimated Fleet Composition (%)*

 


GRAPHIC

H&P’s Contracted U.S. Land Fleet (as of 2/8/11) Note: The above numbers corresponding to H&P’s contracted U.S. land fleet include one delayed new build which generates revenue but does not generate revenue days and 13 pending new build FlexRigs. Eagle Ford Shale, 41 Cana Woodford, 24 Haynesville Shale, 23 Permian Basin, 23 Avalon/Bone Springs Shale, 5 Bakken Shale, 22 Marcellus Shale, 13 Barnett Shale, 12 Piceance Basin, 10 Granite Wash, 9 East Woodford, 2 Niobrara, 2 Other Unconventional, 11 Conventional Oil, 12 Conventional Gas, 3

 


GRAPHIC

Organically Growing Active Rig Market Share Note: The above estimates corresponding to the total available U.S. land fleet are derived from multiple sources including Rig Data, Smith Bits, and corporate filings. Lower 48 U.S. Land Market Share As of February 2, 2001 Lower 48 U.S. Land Market Share As of February 4, 2011 0% 3% 6% 9% 12% 15% 18% 21% HP PTEN NBR UNT 0% 3% 6% 9% 12% 15% 18% 21% NBR PTEN HP UNT

 


GRAPHIC

 * Does not include the impact of early contract termination revenue. Technology and Quality Service Make a Difference ** Represents weighted-average rig margin per day for PTEN, NBR and UNT through Q3CY10. H&P’s Margin Premium $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $14,000 $16,000 Q1CY05 Q2CY05 Q3CY05 Q4CY05 Q1CY06 Q2CY06 Q3CY06 Q4CY06 Q1CY07 Q2CY07 Q3CY07 Q4CY07 Q1CY08 Q2CY08 Q3CY08 Q4CY08 Q1CY09 Q2CY09 Q3CY09 Q4CY09 Q1CY10 Q2CY10 Q3CY10 Q4CY10 Average Rig Margin per Day Quarter Ended U.S. Land Average Daywork Margins* H&P Peers**

 


GRAPHIC

 * Utilization is herein calculated to be average active rigs divided by estimated available marketable rigs during the period. Technology and Quality Service Make a Difference ** Represents estimated average combined utilization for PTEN, NBR and UNT in the Lower 48 through Q3CY10. H&P’s Utilization Premium 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Q1CY05 Q2CY05 Q3CY05 Q4CY05 Q1CY06 Q2CY06 Q3CY06 Q4CY06 Q1CY07 Q2CY07 Q3CY07 Q4CY07 Q1CY08 Q2CY08 Q3CY08 Q4CY08 Q1CY09 Q2CY09 Q3CY09 Q4CY09 Q1CY10 Q2CY10 Q3CY10 Q4CY11 Estimated Avarege Rig Utilization Quarter Ended U.S. Land Estimated Average Rig Utilization* H&P Peers**

 


GRAPHIC

Highest U.S. Activity Level in Company History As of 2/8/11 - 40% - 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 120% 140% Q1CY05 Q2CY05 Q3CY05 Q4CY05 Q1CY06 Q2CY06 Q3CY06 Q4CY06 Q1CY07 Q2CY07 Q3CY07 Q4CY07 Q1CY08 Q2CY08 Q3CY08 Q4CY08 Q1CY09 Q2CY09 Q3CY09 Q4CY09 Q1CY10 Q2CY10 Q3CY10 Q4CY10 Change in Average Active Rigs Quarterly Average Growth / Decline in U.S. Lower 48 Average Rig Activity H&P (From 84 to 188 Rigs at ~84% Utilization in Q4CY10) Baker Hughes U.S. Land Rig Count

 


GRAPHIC

Most Profitable Driller in U.S. Land Business * PTEN’s operating income includes drilling operations in Canada. ** NBR’s operating income corresponds to its U.S. Lower 48 Land Drilling segment. - $50 $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 Q1CY05 Q2CY05 Q3CY05 Q4CY05 Q1CY06 Q2CY06 Q3CY06 Q4CY06 Q1CY07 Q2CY07 Q3CY07 Q4CY07 Q1CY08 Q2CY08 Q3CY08 Q4CY08 Q1CY09 Q2CY09 Q3CY09 Q4CY09 Q1CY10 Q2CY10 Q3CY10 Q4CY10 Operating Income (Millions) Quarter Ended U.S. Land Drilling Operating Income HP NBR** PTEN* UNT

 


GRAPHIC

Rigs Working/ Contracted 199 7 16 222 13 235 Rigs Available 236 9 23* 268 13 281 % Contracted 84% 78% 70% 83% U.S. Land Offshore International Land Total FlexRig Construction Total Fleet Activity as of February 8, 2011 * One FlexRig currently in the U.S. will be deploying to Bahrain during the third fiscal quarter of 2011.

 


GRAPHIC

H&P’s U.S. Land Fleet Activity ** Includes delayed new builds (in gray) which generated revenue but did not generate revenue days. * Active rigs on term (in blue) generated both revenue and revenue days. 34 47 52 57 59 69 89 99 106 121 129 129 128 150 163 180 189 199 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 Avg. Q1FY10 Avg. Q2FY10 Avg. Q3FY10 Avg. Q4FY10 Avg. Q1FY11 2/8/2011 Number of Active H&P U.S. Land Rigs Active Rigs in Spot Market Active Rigs on Term* Delayed New Builds**

 


GRAPHIC

 H&P’s Global Fleet Under Term Contracts 128 120 105 91 78 72 64 55 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 Q2FY11 Q3FY11 Q4FY11 Q1FY12 Q2FY12 Q3FY12 Q4FY12 Q1FY13 Number of Rigs Already Under Long - Term Contracts (Estimated Quarterly Average) Term Contract Status - H&P Global Fleet (Including Committed New Builds) U.S. Land Offshore International Land

 


GRAPHIC

 Since March 2010, H&P has announced the construction of 31 new FlexRigs, all of which are contracted under multi-year term agreements. Having completed the construction of 18 of these 31 rigs, 13 are scheduled to be completed during calendar 2011. New build rigs will be deploying primarily to oil and liquids rich markets including the Eagle Ford Shale, the CANA Woodford Shale, the Bakken Shale, and the Permian Basin. H&P New Builds

 


GRAPHIC

 Customers continue to focus on efficiency to achieve lower total well costs. Drilling today involves more complex well designs. Increasing safety and environmental sensitivity Market Trends Favor H&P

 


GRAPHIC

End of Presentation

 


GRAPHIC

Additional References:

 


GRAPHIC

Market Observations Strong oil prices and the ability of H&P customers to shift their drilling targets to oil and gas liquids rich plays has been a very positive driver for service providers in the U. S. market. Not long ago, a shift to oil drilling would have been considered a negative for H&P since so much of the activity used to be shallow, vertical, “bread and butter” type drilling. That has changed; today, with the strong emphasis on directional and horizontal drilling, the new mix plays to H&P’s strengths. Older, conventional equipment is increasingly less suitable to the customers’ needs and today’s drilling complexity for both oil and gas. Increasing drilling complexity, a focus on better efficiencies and requirements for strong safety and operational performance should all provide a positive environment for H&P to build shareholder value and capture market share both in the U. S. and internationally.

 


GRAPHIC

 While natural gas will still be critical to the future domestic energy picture and to our business, nearly 60% of H&P’s U.S. land fleet is drilling for oil and gas liquids, as compared to a more traditional dry gas target. Driven by incremental new builds and the return of rigs from Mexico, we expect total revenue days in the U.S. land segment to increase between three and four percent from the first to the second fiscal quarter of 2011. Quarterly average rig revenue per day is expected to increase between $400 and $500 per day from the first to the second fiscal quarter of 2011. Including only rigs that are already under fixed commitments, we expect to have an average of 121 rigs under term contract in fiscal 2011 and 76 in fiscal 2012 H&P’s U.S. Land Operations

 


GRAPHIC

 While the Company will benefit from FlexRigs going back to work in the U.S. at higher margins than they would have earned in Mexico, segment operating income for the international segment during the second fiscal quarter will be negatively impacted by ceasing operations in Mexico. Total revenue days during the second fiscal quarter are expected to decrease by about 25 percent sequentially from the first fiscal quarter of 2011. Average rig margin per day, including early termination revenues, is expected to decrease by about 35 to 40 percent in the second fiscal quarter as compared to the first fiscal quarter of 2011. H&P’s International Land Operations

 


GRAPHIC

H&P’s International Land Operations Rig Fleet Status (as of February 8, 2011) 8 of 10 FlexRigs (included in the international fleet of 23 rigs) are under long-term contracts. (1) Active Idle Total Long-term Contracts Argentina 5 4 9 4 Bahrain 2 2 2 Colombia 5 1 6 2 Ecuador 2 2 4 Tunisia 2 2 Total 16 7 23 8 (1)

 


GRAPHIC

 Seven of the Company’s nine offshore platform rigs remain active, including two under long-term contracts. The number of revenue days during the second fiscal quarter of 2011 are expected to increase approximately five percent sequentially. Average rig margin per day is expected to increase by 15 to 20 percent during the second fiscal quarter of 2011 as compared to the first fiscal quarter. Segment operating income during the second fiscal quarter of 2011 will be negatively impacted by approximately $2 million associated with less management contract revenue. H&P’s Offshore Operations

 


GRAPHIC

AC Driven Systems & Integrated Top Drive Mechanized Tubular Handling Computerized Controls BOP Handling Driller’s Cabin Satellite Communications Rig Move Capabilities Leader in New Ideas & Applied Technology 31

 


GRAPHIC

Driller on a Conventional Rig vs. FlexRig™ Drawworks Brake Handle Drawworks Joystick Control 31

 


GRAPHIC

Roughnecks on a Conventional Rig vs. FlexRigTM

 


GRAPHIC

U.S. Land Safety Performance (1994 – 2010) OSHA Recordable Injury Incidence Rates H&P = 1.07 IADC 3Q10 = 3.31 INJURIES PER 200,000 MANHOURS MANHOURS WORKED (MM) Delivering Safety – H&P vs. Industry (IADC) MANHOURS = 11.4 MM 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 ' YEAR 0 2 4 6 8 10 12

 


GRAPHIC

Safety Excellence Also Generates Savings Reduced Workers Comp and General Liability Losses per Man Hour EMR = Experience Modifier Ratio (Industry Average = 1.00) $0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 $0.00 $0.50 $1.00 $1.50 $2.00 $2.50 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 COST/MAN HOUR Actual Cost Per Man Hour Worked U.S. Land & Offshore Operations EMR FY10 = .34 FY09 = .35 FY08 = .34 FY07 = .33 FY06 = .30 FY05 = .32 FY04 = .32 FY03 = .34 FY02 = .37 FY01 = .38 FY00 = .41

 


GRAPHIC

Source: EnergyPoint Research, Inc. * Trailing four quarters average Customer Satisfaction Index 10 = “Highly Satisfied”, 1 = “Highly Dissatisfied”

 


GRAPHIC

New Builds – H&P’s FlexRig Program The FlexRig Difference: Key Advantages Increased drilling productivity and reliability Variable frequency (AC) drives with increased precision and measurability Computerized electronic driller that precisely controls weight on bit, rotation and pressure Designed to move quickly from well to well Accelerated well programs and NPV gains A significantly enhanced and safer workplace Minimized impact to the environment Total well cost savings even at premium dayrates

 


GRAPHIC

 Estimated Estimated Peer H&P FlexRig3 Conventional Fit-for-purpose Average Average Average 2010 (Spot Market) (Spot Market) (Spot Market) 1. Drilling days 20 14 10 Completion days 3 3 3 Moving days 7 4 3 Total rig revenue days per well 30 21 16 2. Drilling contractor dayrate $17,500 $23,000 $25,000 Operator’s other intangible $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 cost per day estimate Total daily cost estimate $42,500 $48,000 $50,000 Total cost per well (daily services) $1,275,000 $1,008,000 $800,000 3. Total well savings with H&P – per well $475,000 $208,000 per year $10.8MM $4.8MM Increased wells per rig per year versus conventional average: 11 wells Increased wells per rig per year versus peer fit-for-purpose: 5 wells A Value Proposition Example – H&P vs. Competitors

 


GRAPHIC

 Performance is not only about better rigs It’s also about: People Safety Experience Training Culture Supply chain Maintenance Processes Organizational network Support structure A Strong Field Organization

 


GRAPHIC

* Represents the customer’s fastest reported Bakken Shale well before deploying a H&P FlexRig. FlexRig3 – Performance Sample 59% Improvement 45% Improvement

 


GRAPHIC

31% Improvement 50% Improvement FlexRig3 – Performance Sample

 


GRAPHIC

45% Improvement 30% Improvement FlexRig3 – Performance Sample

 


GRAPHIC

FlexRig4M – Performance Sample 33 % Improvement 58 % Improvement

 


GRAPHIC

FlexRig4S – Performance Sample 35% Improvement 68% Improvement

 


GRAPHIC

Improving Rig Counts U.S. Land International Land 0 300 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 2,400 2,700 0 300 600 900 1,200 1,500 1,800 2,100 2,400 2,700 Monthly Average Baker Hughes U.S. Land and MI Swaco International Land Rig Counts MI Swaco International Land Rig Count BHI U.S. Land Rig Count

 


GRAPHIC

Alaska Shale Gas Offshore Other Onshore (Includes Tight Sands) Projections History TCF Source: Energy Information Administration Annual Energy Outlook 2010 with projections to 2035 (May 2010). Unconventional Natural Gas Production Growing Coalbed Methane 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 1990 1995 2000 2008 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035

 


GRAPHIC

Increasing Focus on More Difficult Drilling 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Percentage of Active U.S. Rigs (BHI North American Rotary Rig Count) Week Ended U.S. Rig Activity by Drilling Type Vertical Drilling Horizontal or Directional Drilling

 


GRAPHIC

Increasing Focus on More Difficult Drilling 31% 37% 43% 51% 68% 80% 85% 53% 69% 0 400 800 1200 1600 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Feb - 11 Peak (2008) Trough (2009) Number of Active Rigs (Smith Bits S.T.A.T.S.) Annual Average During Each Prior Year Active Rigs in U.S. Land Drilling for Natural Gas Horizontal or Directional Drilling Vertical Drilling

 


GRAPHIC

Crude Oil & Natural Gas Prices Source: Energy Information Administration, Short-term Energy Outlook as of 1/11/2011. Crude Oil Natural Gas $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 U.S. Dollars per Thousand Cubic Feet U.S. Dollars per Barrel Monthly Average West Texas Intermediate Spot Average Forecasted West Texas Intermediate Spot Average Henry Hub Spot Forecasted Henry Hub Spot

 


GRAPHIC

End of Document