UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM
TO
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-4221
HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE
|
|
|
|
73-0679879
|
(State or other
jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
|
|
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)
|
1437 S. BOULDER AVE., SUITE 1400, TULSA, OKLAHOMA 74119-3623
(Address of principal executive
offices) (Zip
code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code (918) 742-5531
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
TITLE OF EACH CLASS
|
|
|
|
NAME OF EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED
|
Common Stock
($0.10 par value)
|
|
|
|
New
York Stock Exchange
|
Common Stock
Purchase Rights
|
|
|
|
New
York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [
]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [
]
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is an accelerated
filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]
At March 31, 2005, the aggregate market value of the voting stock
held by non-affiliates was $1,945,419,202.
Number of shares of common stock outstanding at December 2, 2005:
52,011,465.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Certain portions of the following documents have been
incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K as indicated:
Documents
|
|
|
|
10-K Parts
|
(1) Annual Report
to Stockholders for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
Parts I and II
|
(2) Proxy
Statement for Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held March 1, 2006
|
|
|
|
Part III
|
DISCLOSURE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
THIS REPORT INCLUDES FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
WITHIN THE MEANING OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, AND THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. ALL STATEMENTS OTHER THAN STATEMENTS
OF HISTORICAL FACTS INCLUDED IN THIS REPORT, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, STATEMENTS REGARDING THE REGISTRANTS FUTURE FINANCIAL POSITION,
BUSINESS STRATEGY, BUDGETS, PROJECTED COSTS AND PLANS AND OBJECTIVES OF MANAGEMENT FOR FUTURE OPERATIONS, ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. IN ADDITION,
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS GENERALLY CAN BE IDENTIFIED BY THE USE OF FORWARD-LOOKING TERMINOLOGY SUCH AS MAY, WILL,
EXPECT, INTEND, ESTIMATE, ANTICIPATE, BELIEVE, OR CONTINUE OR THE NEGATIVE
THEREOF OR SIMILAR TERMINOLOGY. ALTHOUGH THE REGISTRANT BELIEVES THAT THE EXPECTATIONS REFLECTED IN SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE REASONABLE, IT
CAN GIVE NO ASSURANCE THAT SUCH EXPECTATIONS WILL PROVE TO BE CORRECT. IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THE
REGISTRANTS EXPECTATIONS ARE DISCLOSED IN THIS REPORT UNDER THE CAPTION RISK FACTORS BEGINNING ON PAGE 7, AS WELL AS IN
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION ON PAGES 8 THROUGH 32 OF THE COMPANYS ANNUAL
REPORT. ALL SUBSEQUENT WRITTEN AND ORAL FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE REGISTRANT, OR PERSONS ACTING ON ITS BEHALF, ARE EXPRESSLY
QUALIFIED IN THEIR ENTIRETY BY SUCH CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS. THE REGISTRANT ASSUMES NO DUTY TO UPDATE OR REVISE ITS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS BASED ON
CHANGES IN INTERNAL ESTIMATES OR EXPECTATIONS OR OTHERWISE.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (the Company), was
incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on February 3, 1940, and is successor to a business originally organized in 1920. The Company is
primarily engaged in contract drilling of oil and gas wells for others. The contract drilling business accounts for almost all of the Companys
operating revenues. The Company is also engaged in the ownership, development, and operation of commercial real estate.
The Company is organized into two separate operating entities,
contract drilling and real estate. Both businesses operate independently of the other through wholly owned subsidiaries. Operating decentralization is
balanced by a centralized finance division, which handles all accounting, information technology, budgeting, insurance, cash management, and related
activities.
The Companys contract drilling business is composed of
three business segments: U.S. land drilling, U.S. offshore platform drilling and international drilling. The Companys U.S. land drilling is
conducted primarily in Oklahoma, Texas, Wyoming, Colorado, and Louisiana, and offshore from platforms in the Gulf of Mexico and California. The Company
also operated in seven international locations during fiscal 2005: Venezuela, Ecuador, Colombia, Argentina, Bolivia, Equatorial Guinea, and Hungary. In
addition, the Company provided drilling consulting services for one customer in Russia.
The Companys real estate investments are located in Tulsa,
Oklahoma, where the Company maintains its executive offices.
Prior to October 1, 2002, the Company was engaged in the
exploration, production and sale of crude oil and natural gas business (exploration and production business). During fiscal 2002, the
Company transferred the assets and liabilities of its exploration and production business to its wholly owned subsidiary, Cimarex Energy Co. On
September 30, 2002, the Company distributed the common stock of Cimarex Energy Co. to the Companys stockholders and completed a merger of Key
Production Company, Inc. with a subsidiary of Cimarex Energy Co. As a result of this transaction, Cimarex Energy Co. became a separate publicly-traded
company that owned and operated the exploration and production business. The Company does not own any common stock of Cimarex Energy
Co.
CONTRACT DRILLING
The Company believes that it is one of the major land and
offshore platform drilling contractors in the western hemisphere. Operating principally in North and South America, the Company specializes in medium
to deep drilling in major oil and gas producing basins of the United States and in drilling for oil and gas in international locations. In the United
States, the Company draws its customers primarily from the major oil companies and the larger independents. In South America, the Companys
current customers include the Venezuelan state petroleum company and major international oil companies.
In fiscal 2005, the Company received approximately 59 percent of
its consolidated operating revenues from the Companys ten largest contract drilling customers. BP plc, ExxonMobil Corporation, and Petroleos de
Venezuela S.A. (respectively, BP, ExxonMobil and PDVSA), including their affiliates, are the Companys three
largest contract drilling customers. The Company performs drilling services for BP and ExxonMobil on a world-wide basis and PDVSA in Venezuela.
Revenues from drilling services performed for BP, ExxonMobil and PDVSA in fiscal 2005 accounted for approximately 11 percent, 9 percent and 8 percent,
respectively, of the Companys consolidated operating revenues for the same period.
1
The Company provides drilling rigs, equipment, personnel, and
camps on a contract basis. These services are provided so that the Companys customers may explore for and develop oil and gas from onshore areas
and from fixed platforms, tension-leg platforms and spars in offshore areas. Each of the drilling rigs consists of engines, drawworks, a mast, pumps,
blowout preventers, a drillstring, and related equipment. The intended well depth and the drilling site conditions are the principal factors that
determine the size and type of rig most suitable for a particular drilling job. A land drilling rig may be moved from location to location without
modification to the rig. A helicopter rig is one that can be disassembled into component part loads of approximately 4,000-20,000 pounds and
transported to remote locations by helicopter, cargo plane, or other means. A platform rig is specifically designed to perform drilling operations upon
a particular platform. While a platform rig may be moved from its original platform, significant expense is incurred to modify a platform rig for
operation on each subsequent platform. In addition to traditional platform rigs, the Company operates self-moving minimum-space platform drilling rigs
and drilling rigs to be used on tension-leg platforms and spars. The minimum-space rig is designed to be moved without the use of expensive derrick
barges. The tension-leg platforms and spars allow drilling operations to be conducted in much deeper water than traditional fixed
platforms.
During fiscal 1998, the Company put to work a new generation of
six highly mobile/depth flexible land drilling rigs (individually the FlexRig®). The FlexRig has been able to significantly reduce
average rig move times compared to similar depth-rated traditional land rigs. In addition, the FlexRig allows a greater depth flexibility of between
8,000 to 18,000 feet and provides greater operating efficiency. The original six rigs were designated as FlexRig1 rigs. Subsequently, the Company built
and completed 12 new FlexRig2 rigs. During fiscal 2001, the Company announced that it would build an additional 25 new FlexRigs. These new rigs, known
as FlexRig3, were the next generation of FlexRigs which incorporated new drilling technology and new environmental and safety design. This
new design included integrated top drive, AC electric drive, hydraulic BOP handling system, hydraulic tubular make-up and break-out system, split crown
and traveling blocks and an enlarged drill floor that enables simultaneous crew activities. All 25 of these FlexRig3s were completed by June of 2003.
Subsequently, the Company constructed seven more FlexRig3s at an approximate cost of $11.2 million each. Construction of these rigs was completed by
March of 2004. All FlexRigs are available for work in the Companys U.S. and international drilling operations.
During fiscal 2005 and the first quarter of fiscal 2006, the
Company entered into separate drilling contracts with 12 exploration and production companies to build and operate a total of 50 new FlexRigs. Of the
50 FlexRigs, eight are FlexRig3s and 42 are FlexRig4s (described below). Each of the drilling contracts provides for a minimum fixed contract term of
at least three years, with drilling services to be performed on a daywork contract basis. The FlexRig3 construction cost is approximately $14 million
each and the FlexRig4 cost is approximately $11 million each. While the Company experienced an approximate 30-day construction schedule delay due to
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, approximately 30 FlexRigs should be completed during fiscal 2006 and the remainder by the end of fiscal 2007. This 50 rig
new-build project represents the single largest rig construction project in the Companys history.
While the new FlexRig3s are similar to the Companys
existing FlexRig3s, the FlexRig4s are designed to efficiently drill shallower depth wells of between 4,000 and 14,000 feet. The FlexRig4 design
includes a trailerized version and a skidding version, which incorporate new environmental and safety design. This new design includes a pipe handling
system which allows the rig to be operated by a reduced crew and eliminates the need for a casing stabber in the mast.
While the trailerized version provides for more efficient well
site to well site rig moves, the skidding version allows for drilling of up to 22 wells from a single pad which will result in reduced environmental
impact.
® FlexRig is a registered trademark of Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
2
The Company utilizes a lean manufacturing process in the
construction of its FlexRigs. This approach minimizes the amount of equipment and supplies that must be inventoried. However, after experiencing delays
resulting from Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the Company will temporarily inventory increased amounts of equipment and supplies to reduce future
delays.
The Companys drilling contracts are obtained through
competitive bidding or as a result of negotiations with customers, and sometimes cover multi-well and multi-year projects. Each drilling rig operates
under a separate drilling contract. During fiscal 2005, all drilling services were performed on a daywork contract basis, under which the
Company charges a fixed rate per day, with the price determined by the location, depth and complexity of the well to be drilled, operating conditions,
the duration of the contract, and the competitive forces of the market. The Company has previously performed contracts on a combination
footage and daywork basis, under which the Company charged a fixed rate per foot of hole drilled to a stated depth, usually no
deeper than 15,000 feet, and a fixed rate per day for the remainder of the hole. Contracts performed on a footage basis involve a greater
element of risk to the contractor than do contracts performed on a daywork basis. Also, the Company has previously accepted
turnkey contracts under which the Company charges a fixed sum to deliver a hole to a stated depth and agrees to furnish services such as
testing, coring, and casing the hole which are not normally done on a footage basis. Turnkey contracts entail varying degrees
of risk greater than the usual footage contract. The Company did not accept any footage or turnkey contracts during
fiscal 2005. The Company believes that under current market conditions footage and turnkey contract rates do not adequately
compensate contractors for the added risks. The duration of the Companys drilling contracts are well-to-well or for a fixed term.
Well-to-well contracts are cancelable at the option of either party upon the completion of drilling at any one site. Fixed-term contracts
customarily provide for termination at the election of the customer, with an early termination payment to be paid to the contractor if a
contract is terminated prior to the expiration of the fixed term. However, under certain limited circumstances such as destruction of a drilling rig or
sustained unacceptable performance, no early termination payment would be paid to the contractor.
Excluding the fixed term contracts covering the 50 FlexRig
new-build project, the Company has 33 rigs under fixed term contracts as of the end of November 2005. While the duration for these current fixed-term
contracts are for six month to three year periods, some fixed-term and well-to-well contracts are expected to be continued for longer periods than the
original terms. However, the contracting parties have no legal obligation to extend the contracts. Contracts generally contain renewal or extension
provisions exercisable at the option of the customer at prices mutually agreeable to the Company and the customer. In most instances contracts provide
for additional payments for mobilization and demobilization.
U.S. LAND DRILLING
At the end of September, 2005 and 2004, the Company had 91 and
87, respectively, of its land rigs available for work in the United States. The total number of rigs owned at the end of the period increased by a net
of four rigs, resulting from six rigs moving back from the Companys international fleet during fiscal year 2005, and the sale of two conventional
rigs in November of 2004. The Companys U.S. land operations contributed approximately 66 percent of the Companys consolidated operating
revenues during fiscal 2005, compared with approximately 59 percent of consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2004 and approximately 54 percent
of consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2003. Rig utilization in fiscal 2005 was approximately 94 percent, up from approximately 87 percent in
fiscal 2004. The Companys fleet of FlexRigs and highly mobile rigs maintained an average utilization of approximately 99 percent during fiscal
2005 while the Companys conventional rigs had an average utilization rate of approximately 82 percent. At the close of fiscal 2005, 87 land rigs
were working out of 91 available rigs.
3
U.S. OFFSHORE PLATFORM DRILLING
The Companys offshore platform operations contributed
approximately 11 percent of the Companys consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2005, compared with approximately 14 percent of
consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2004 and approximately 22 percent of consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2003. Rig utilization
in fiscal 2005 was approximately 53 percent, up from approximately 48 percent in fiscal 2004. At the end of this fiscal year, the
Company had seven of its 11 offshore platform rigs (excluding Rig 201) under contract and continued to work under management contracts for two customer-owned rigs.
Revenues from drilling services performed for the Companys largest offshore platform drilling customer totaled approximately 73 percent of U.S.
offshore platform revenues during fiscal 2005.
The Companys offshore platform Rig 201 sustained
significant damage from Hurricane Katrina. Specific equipment damage assessment has not been completed. The Company does not anticipate Rig 201
returning to service during fiscal 2006. The rig was insured at a value that approximated replacement cost. Excluding Rig 201, seven platform rigs are
under contract as of the end of November 2005, and one additional rig is expected to be contracted for work commencing the second fiscal quarter of
2006.
INTERNATIONAL DRILLING
General
The Companys international drilling operations began in
1958 with the acquisition of Sinclair Oil Companys drilling rigs in Venezuela. Helmerich & Payne de Venezuela, C.A., a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company, is one of the leading drilling contractors in Venezuela. Beginning in 1972, with the introduction of its first helicopter
rig, the Company expanded into other Latin American countries.
The Companys international operations contributed
approximately 22 percent of the Companys consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2005, compared with approximately 25 percent of
consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2004 and approximately 22 percent of consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2003. Rig utilization
in fiscal 2005 was 77 percent, up from 54 percent in fiscal 2004.
Venezuela
Venezuelan operations continue to be a significant part of the
Companys operations. During fiscal 2005, the Company moved a highly mobile rig to the United States, reducing the rig count to 12 in Venezuela.
The Company worked for the Venezuelan state petroleum company, PDVSA, during fiscal 2005 and revenues from this work accounted for approximately 8
percent of the Companys consolidated operating revenues during the fiscal year and approximately 38 percent of international operating revenues.
Revenues generated from all Venezuelan drilling operations contributed approximately 8 percent of the Companys consolidated operating revenues
during 2005, compared with approximately 10 percent of consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2004 and 6 percent of consolidated operating
revenues during 2003. The Company had nine rigs working in Venezuela at the end of fiscal 2005.
The Companys rig utilization rate in Venezuela has
increased from approximately 65 percent during fiscal 2004 to approximately 72 percent in fiscal 2005. The Company has contracted to return one idle
rig back to work during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. At this time, the Company is unable to predict future fluctuations in its utilization
rates.
4
Ecuador
At the end of fiscal 2005, the Company owned eight rigs in
Ecuador. The Companys utilization rate was approximately 97 percent during fiscal 2005, up from approximately 74 percent in fiscal 2004. Revenues
generated by Ecuadorian drilling operations contributed approximately 8 percent of the Companys consolidated operating revenues during fiscal
2005, as compared with approximately 7 percent of consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2004 and approximately 10 percent of consolidated
operating revenues during fiscal 2003. Revenues from drilling services performed for the Companys largest customer in Ecuador totaled
approximately 3 percent of consolidated operating revenues and approximately 13 percent of international operating revenues during fiscal 2005. The
Ecuadorian drilling contracts are primarily with large international oil companies.
Colombia
During fiscal 2005, the Company owned two rigs in Colombia. The
Companys utilization rate in Colombia was approximately 87 percent during fiscal 2005, up from approximately 13 percent in fiscal 2004. The
revenues generated by Colombian drilling operations contributed approximately 2 percent of the Companys consolidated operating revenues in fiscal
2005, as compared with approximately 1 percent of consolidated operating revenues during fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003. At the end of fiscal 2005, the
Company was operating two rigs in Colombia.
Other Locations
In addition to its operations in Venezuela, Ecuador and Colombia,
at the end of fiscal 2005, the Company owned two rigs in Bolivia, and two rigs in Argentina. During fiscal 2005, one rig was moved to the United States
from Hungary.
At the end of November 2005, two rigs were working in Argentina
with an additional rig moving to Argentina from the United States. This rig is under contract and expected to begin work during the second quarter of
fiscal 2006. One rig has moved from Bolivia to Chile and started drilling operations, and one rig is under contract in Bolivia. It is expected to begin
work during the second quarter of fiscal 2006.
During fiscal 2005, the Company continued operations under a
management contract for a customer-owned platform rig located offshore Equatorial Guinea. Also, during the fiscal year, the Company completed a
drilling consulting services contract in Russia. The Company continues to pursue opportunities in Russia.
REAL ESTATE OPERATIONS
The Companys real estate operations are conducted
exclusively within the metropolitan area of Tulsa, Oklahoma. Its major holding is Utica Square Shopping Center, consisting of 15 separate buildings,
with parking and other common facilities covering an area of approximately 30 acres. Utica Square contains approximately 441,588 usable square feet,
composed of retail space of 379,018 usable square feet, office space of 38,785 usable square feet, storage space of 6,600 usable square feet and common
area space of 17,185 usable square feet. The Companys real estate operations occupy approximately 4,140 square feet of general office and storage
space within the shopping center. Occupancy in the shopping center was approximately 91 percent in fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004.
At the end of the 2005 fiscal year, the Company owned 11 of a
total of 73 units in The Yorktown, a 16-story luxury residential condominium with approximately 150,940 square feet of living area located on a
six-acre tract adjacent to Utica Square Shopping Center. Nine of the Companys units are currently leased.
The Company owns and leases to third parties multi-tenant
warehouse space. Three warehouses known as Space Center, each containing approximately 165,000 square feet of net leasable space, are situated in the
southeast part of Tulsa at the intersection of two major limited-access highways. Present occupancy is approximately 89 percent, which is up from
approximately 82 percent one year ago. The increase in occupancy is due to the
5
addition of three new tenants. The Company also owns
approximately 1.5 acres of undeveloped land lying adjacent to such warehouses.
Southpark is an undeveloped tract of land located in a high
growth area of southeast Tulsa and is suitable for mixed commercial and light industrial use. At the end of fiscal 2005, the Company owned
approximately 218 acres in Southpark consisting of approximately 205 acres of undeveloped real estate and approximately 13 acres of multi-tenant
warehouse area. The warehouse area is known as Space Center East and consists of two warehouses, one containing approximately 90,000 square feet and
the other containing approximately 112,500 square feet. Occupancy increased to approximately 89 percent in 2005 from approximately 82 percent in fiscal
2004 due to the addition of two new tenants. The Company believes that a high quality office park, with peripheral commercial, office/warehouse, and
hotel sites, is the best development use for the remaining land. The Company has contracted with a professional engineering and planning firm to
prepare a topographic survey and preliminary site engineering plan to aid in the possible future development of Southpark.
The Company owns a five-building complex called Tandem Business
Park. The property is located adjacent to and east of the Space Center East facility and contains approximately six acres, with approximately 88,084
square feet of office/warehouse space. Occupancy has increased from approximately 69 percent in 2004 to approximately 76 percent during fiscal 2005 due
to the addition of three tenants. The Company also owns a 12-building complex, consisting of approximately 204,600 square feet of office/warehouse
space, called Tulsa Business Park. The property is located south and east of the Space Center facility, separated by a city street, and contains
approximately 12 acres. During fiscal 2005, occupancy has decreased from approximately 81 percent to approximately 69 percent due to the loss of one
tenant.
The Company owns two service center properties located adjacent
to arterial streets in south central Tulsa. The first, called Maxim Center, consists of one office/warehouse building containing approximately 40,800
square feet and is located on approximately 2.5 acres. During fiscal 2005, occupancy has decreased to approximately 56 percent from approximately 94
percent due to the loss of one large tenant. The second, called Maxim Place, consists of one office/warehouse building containing approximately 33,750
square feet and is located on approximately 2.25 acres. During fiscal 2005, occupancy has increased from approximately 44 percent to approximately 63
percent with the addition of one new tenant. The Companys offsite disaster recovery center occupies approximately 3,517 square feet of office and
computer equipment space in this property.
During fiscal 2005, the Company completed the demolition and site
reclamation of its former headquarters building. No development plans for the site are pending.
FINANCIAL
Information relating to revenues, total assets and operating
income or loss by business segments may be found on pages 58 through 62 of the Companys Annual Report.
EMPLOYEES
The Company had 3,615 employees within the United States (six of
which were part-time employees) and 1,186 employees in international operations as of September 30, 2005.
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
Information relating to the Companys internet address and
the Companys SEC filings may be found on page 64 of the Companys Annual Report.
6
RISK FACTORS
In addition to the risk factors discussed elsewhere in this
Report, the Company cautions that the following Risk Factors could affect its actual results in the future.
Competition in the Contract Drilling
Business
The contract drilling business is highly competitive. Competition
in contract drilling involves such factors as price, rig availability, efficiency, condition of equipment, reputation, operating safety, and customer
relations. Competition is primarily on a regional basis and may vary significantly by region at any particular time. Land drilling rigs can be readily
moved from one region to another in response to changes in levels of activity, and an oversupply of rigs in any region may result, leading to increased
price competition.
Although many contracts for drilling services are awarded based
solely on price, the Company has been successful in establishing long-term relationships with certain customers which have allowed the Company to
secure drilling work even though the Company may not have been the lowest bidder for such work. The Company has continued to attempt to differentiate
its services based upon its engineering design expertise, operational efficiency, and safety and environmental awareness. This strategy is less
effective when lower demand for drilling services intensifies price competition and makes it more difficult or impossible to compete on any basis other
than price. Also, future improvements in operational efficiency and safety by the Companys competitors could negatively affect the Companys
ability to differentiate its services.
Competition in the Real Estate
Business
The Company has numerous competitors in the multi-tenant leasing
business. The size and financial capacity of these competitors range from one property sole proprietors to large international corporations. The
primary competitive factors include price, location, and configuration of space. The Companys competitive position is enhanced by the location of
its properties, its financial capability and the long-term ownership of its properties. However, many competitors have financial resources greater than
the Company and have more contemporary facilities. Also, current economic conditions have encouraged prospective tenants to construct owner-occupied
buildings rather than lease third party space.
2. Operating and Rig Construction
Risks
The drilling operations of the Company are subject to the many
hazards inherent in the business, including inclement weather, blowouts and well fires. These hazards could cause personal injury, suspend drilling
operations, seriously damage or destroy the equipment involved, and cause substantial damage to producing formations and the surrounding areas. The
Companys offshore platform drilling operations are also subject to potentially greater environmental liability, adverse sea conditions and
platform damage or destruction due to collision with aircraft or marine vessels.
The Companys new-build rig assembly facility is located
near the Houston, Texas ship channel. Also, certain of the Companys fabricators and other vendors are located in the Gulf Coast region. Due to
their location, these facilities are exposed to potentially greater hurricane damage.
7
3. Fixed Term Contract Risk
Fixed term drilling contracts customarily provide for termination
at the election of the customer, with an early termination payment to be paid to the Company if a contract is terminated prior to the
expiration of the fixed term. However, under certain limited circumstances, such as destruction of a drilling rig or sustained unacceptable performance
by the Company, no early termination payment would be paid to the Company.
4. Indemnification and Insurance
Coverage
The Company has insurance coverage for comprehensive general
liability, public liability, automobile liability, workers compensation, employers liability, and property damage. Generally, deductibles
range from $1 million or $2 million per occurrence, depending on whether a claim occurs inside or outside of the United States. The Company maintains
certain other insurance coverages with $5 million deductibles. Insurance is purchased over these deductibles to limit the Companys exposure to
catastrophic events. In fiscal 2005, the Company obtained property insurance coverage for 85 percent of the aggregate estimated replacement cost of its land rigs in excess
of a $1 million deductible. The Company self-insured the remaining 15 percent of such land rig value. No insurance is carried against loss of earnings
or business interruption. The Company is unable to obtain significant amounts of insurance to cover risks of underground reservoir damage; however, the
Company is generally indemnified under its drilling contracts from this risk.
The Company retains a significant portion of its expected losses
under its workers compensation, general, and automobile liability programs. The Company records estimates for incurred outstanding liabilities
for unresolved workers compensation, general liability claims and for claims that are incurred but not reported. Estimates are based on historic
experience and statistical methods that the Company believes are reliable. Nonetheless, insurance estimates include certain assumptions and management
judgments regarding the frequency and severity of claims, claim development, and settlement practices. Unanticipated changes in these factors may
produce materially different amounts of expense that would be reported under these programs.
The majority of the Companys insurance coverage has been
purchased through fiscal 2006. Multiple hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico during August and September had a severe impact on the availability and price
of the Companys rig property insurance coverage for 2006. As a result, the Company was able to place only 85 percent of its rig property coverage
excess of a $1 million per occurrence deductible. In addition, the Company could share in losses up to a maximum of $5 million should loss levels
exceed a set percentage of excess property premium. No assurance can be given that all or a portion of the Companys coverage will not be
cancelled during fiscal 2006 or that insurance coverage will continue to be available at rates considered reasonable. No assurance can be given that
the Companys insurance and indemnification arrangements will adequately protect it against all liabilities that could result from the hazards of
its drilling operations. Incurring a liability for which the Company is not fully insured or indemnified could materially affect the Companys
results of operations.
5. Availability of Equipment and
Supplies
The contract drilling business is highly cyclical. During periods
of increased demand for contract drilling services, delays in delivery and shortages of drilling equipment and supplies can occur. These risks are
intensified during periods when the industry experiences significant new drilling rig construction or refurbishment.
6. Volatility of Oil and Gas
Prices
The Companys operations can be materially affected by low
oil and gas prices. The Company believes that any significant reduction in oil and gas prices could depress the level of exploration and production
activity and result in a corresponding decline in demand for the Companys services. Worldwide military, political and economic
events,
8
including initiatives by the Organization of Petroleum
Exporting Countries, may affect both the demand for, and the supply of, oil and gas. Fluctuations during the last few years in the demand and supply of
oil and gas have contributed to, and are likely to continue to contribute to, price volatility. Any prolonged reduction in demand for the
Companys services could have a material and adverse effect on the Company.
7. International Uncertainties and Local
Laws
International operations are subject to certain political,
economic, and other uncertainties not encountered in U.S. operations, including increased risks of terrorism, kidnapping of employees, expropriation of
equipment as well as expropriation of a particular oil company operators property and drilling rights, taxation policies, foreign exchange
restrictions, currency rate fluctuations, and general hazards associated with foreign sovereignty over certain areas in which operations are conducted.
There can be no assurance that there will not be changes in local laws, regulations, and administrative requirements or the interpretation thereof
which could have a material adverse effect on the profitability of the Companys operations or on the ability of the Company to continue
operations in certain areas.
Because of the impact of local laws, the Companys future
operations in certain areas may be conducted through entities in which local citizens own interests and through entities (including joint ventures) in
which the Company holds only a minority interest, or pursuant to arrangements under which the Company conducts operations under contract to local
entities. While the Company believes that neither operating through such entities nor pursuant to such arrangements would have a material adverse
effect on the Companys operations or revenues, there can be no assurance that the Company will in all cases be able to structure or restructure
its operations to conform to local law (or the administration thereof) on terms acceptable to the Company.
Although the Company attempts to minimize the potential impact of
such risks by operating in more than one geographical area, during fiscal 2005, approximately 22 percent of the Companys consolidated operating
revenues were generated from the international contract drilling business. Approximately 85 percent of the international operating revenues were from
operations in South America and approximately 84 percent of South American operating revenues were from Venezuela and Ecuador.
8. Currency Risk
General
Contracts for work in foreign countries generally provide for
payment in United States dollars, except for amounts required to meet local expenses. However, government owned petroleum companies are more frequently
requesting that a greater proportion of these payments be made in local currencies. Based upon current information, the Company believes that exposure
to potential losses from currency devaluation is minimal in Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia, and Equatorial Guinea. In those countries, all receivables and
payments are currently in U.S. dollars. Cash balances are kept at a minimum which assists in reducing exposure.
Argentina
In 2002, Argentina suffered a 60 percent devaluation of the peso.
As a consequence, the Company secured agreements with its customers that limited the portion of the accounts receivable that was paid in pesos with the
balance of such accounts receivable paid in U.S. dollars. The Company experienced minimal Argentine currency losses in fiscal 2005.
9
Venezuela
The Company is exposed to risks of currency devaluation in
Venezuela primarily as a result of bolivar receivable balances and bolivar cash balances. In Venezuela, approximately 40 percent of the Companys
invoice billings are in U.S. dollars and 60 percent are in the local currency, the bolivar. The significance of this arrangement is that even though
the dollar-based invoices may be paid in bolivares, the Company, historically, has usually been able to convert the bolivares into U.S. dollars in a
timely manner and thus avoid, in large measure, devaluation losses pertaining to the dollar-based invoices. However, this arrangement is effective only
in the absence of exchange controls. In January 2003, the Venezuelan government put into effect exchange controls that fixed the exchange rate and also
prohibited the Company, as well as other companies, from converting the bolivar into U.S. dollars through the Central Bank.
As part of the exchange controls regulation, the Venezuelan
government provided a mechanism by which companies could request conversion of bolivares into U.S. dollars. In compliance with such regulations, the
Company, in October of 2003, submitted a request to the Venezuelan government seeking permission to dividend earnings, which would convert 14 billion
bolivares into U.S. dollars. In January 2004, the Venezuelan government approved the Companys request to convert bolivar cash balances to U.S.
dollars and allowed the remittance of $8.8 million U.S. dollars as dividends to the U.S. based parent. As a consequence, the Companys exposure to
currency devaluation was reduced by this amount.
As stated above, the Company is exposed to risks of currency
devaluation in Venezuela primarily as a result of bolivar receivable balances and bolivar cash balances. As a result of a 12 percent devaluation of the
bolivar during fiscal 2005, the Company experienced total devaluation losses of $0.6 million during that same period.
These devaluation losses may not be reflective of the actual
potential for future devaluation losses because of the exchange controls that are currently in place. While the Company is unable to predict future
devaluation in Venezuela, if fiscal 2006 activity levels are similar to fiscal 2005, and if a 10 percent to 20 percent devaluation were to occur, the
Company could experience potential currency devaluation losses ranging from approximately $1.6 million to $2.9 million.
In late August 2003, the Venezuelan state petroleum company
agreed, on a prospective basis, to pay a portion of the Companys dollar-based invoices in U.S. dollars. Were this agreement to end, the Company
would again receive these payments in bolivares and thus increase bolivar cash balances and exposure to devaluation.
On September 28, 2005, the Company made application with the
Venezuelan government requesting the approval to convert bolivar cash balances to U.S. dollars. Upon approval from the Venezuelan government, the
Companys Venezuelan subsidiary will remit those dollars as a dividend to its U.S. based parent, thus reducing the Companys exposure to
currency devaluation.
9. Governmental Instability in
Venezuela
Venezuela has a history of governmental instability. In the event
that extended labor strikes or turmoil occurs, the Company could experience shortages in material and supplies necessary to operate some or all of its
Venezuelan drilling rigs.
During the mid-1970s, the Venezuelan government nationalized the
exploration and production business. At the present time it appears the Venezuelan government will not nationalize the contract drilling business. Any
such nationalization could result in the Companys loss of all or a portion of its assets and business in Venezuela.
10
10. Government Regulation and Environmental
Risks
Many aspects of the Companys operations are subject to
government regulation, including those relating to drilling practices and methods and the level of taxation. In addition, the United States and various
other countries have environmental regulations which affect drilling operations. Drilling contractors may be liable for damages resulting from
pollution. Under United States regulations, drilling contractors must establish financial responsibility to cover potential liability for pollution of
offshore waters. Generally, the Company is indemnified under drilling contracts from liability arising from pollution, except in certain cases of
surface pollution. However, the enforceability of indemnification provisions in foreign countries may be questionable.
The Company believes that it is in substantial compliance with
all legislation and regulations affecting its operations in the drilling of oil and gas wells and in controlling the discharge of wastes. To date,
compliance has not materially affected the capital expenditures, earnings, or competitive position of the Company, although these measures may add to
the costs of drilling operations. Additional legislation or regulation may reasonably be anticipated, and the effect thereof on operations cannot be
predicted.
11. Interest Rate Risk
The Company has a $200 million intermediate-term unsecured debt
obligation with staged maturities from August 2007 to August 2014, with varying fixed interest rates for each maturity series. There was $200 million
outstanding at September 30, 2005, of which $25 million is due in 2007 and the remaining $175 million is due 2009 through 2014. The average interest
rate during the next four years on this debt is 6.4 percent, after which it increases to 6.5 percent. The fair value of this debt at September 30, 2005
was approximately $215 million.
At September 30, 2005, the Company had in place a committed
unsecured line of credit totaling $50 million with no outstanding borrowings. The Company, as of September 30, 2005, had letters of credit totaling $14
million outstanding against such line of credit. The Companys line of credit interest rate is based on LIBOR plus 87.5 to 112.5 basis points or
prime minus 175 to 150 basis points based on the Companys EBITDA to net debt ratio. As the Company draws on this line of credit, it is subject to
the interest rates prevailing during the term at which the Company had outstanding borrowings. Interest rates could rise for various reasons in the
future and increase the Companys total interest expense, depending upon the amount borrowed against the credit line.
12. Equity Price Risk
At September 30, 2005, the Company owned stocks in other publicly
held companies with a total market value of $293.4 million. These securities are subject to a wide variety of market-related risks that could
substantially reduce or increase the market value of the Companys holdings. Except for the Companys holdings in Atwood Oceanics, Inc., the
portfolio is recorded at fair value on its balance sheet with changes in unrealized after-tax value reflected in the equity section of its balance
sheet. Any reduction in market value would have an impact on the Companys debt ratio and financial strength. In October 2004, the Company sold
1,000,000 shares of its position in Atwood Oceanics, Inc. as part of a 2,175,000 share public offering by Atwood. The sale generated $15.9 million
($0.31 per diluted share) of net income in fiscal 2005. The Company currently owns 2,000,000 shares of Atwood.
13. Reliance on Small Number of
Customers
In fiscal 2005, the Company received approximately 59 percent of
its consolidated operating revenues from the Companys ten largest contract drilling customers and approximately 28 percent of its consolidated
operating revenues from the Companys three largest customers (including their affiliates). The Company believes that its relationship with all of
these customers is good; however, the loss of one or more of its larger customers would have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of
operations.
11
14. Key Personnel
The Company utilizes highly skilled personnel in operating and
supporting its businesses. In times of high utilization, it can be difficult to find qualified individuals. Although to date the Companys
operations have not been materially affected by competition for personnel, an inability to obtain a sufficient number of qualified personnel could
materially impact the Companys results of operations.
15. Changes in Technologies
Although the Company takes measures to ensure that it uses
advanced oil and natural gas drilling technology, changes in technology or improvements in competitors equipment could make the Companys
equipment less competitive or require significant capital investments to keep its equipment competitive.
16. Concentration of Credit
The concentration of the Companys customers in the energy
industry could cause them to be similarly affected by changes in industry conditions and, as a result, could impact the Companys exposure to
credit risk. The Company cannot offer assurances that losses due to uncollectible receivables will be consistent with expectations.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
CONTRACT DRILLING
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the
Companys U.S. drilling rigs as of September 30, 2005:
Location
|
|
|
|
Rig
|
|
Optimum Depth
|
|
Rig Type
|
|
Drawworks:
Horsepower
|
FLEXRIGS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig1
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig1
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig1
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig1
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig1
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig1
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig2
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Wyoming
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig2
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Wyoming
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig2
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig2
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig2
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig2
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig2
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig2
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig2
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig2
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig2
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (FlexRig2
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
12
Location
|
|
|
|
Rig
|
|
Optimum Depth
|
|
Rig Type
|
|
Drawworks:
Horsepower
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
220
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Colorado
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
AC (FlexRig3
|
)
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HIGHLY MOBILE RIGS
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
Mechanical
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
900
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
Mechanical
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Wyoming
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
Mechanical
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
Mechanical
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
Mechanical
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
Mechanical
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
Mechanical
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
14,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Wyoming
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Wyoming
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
13
Location
|
|
|
|
Rig
|
|
Optimum Depth
|
|
Rig Type
|
|
Drawworks:
Horsepower
|
CONVENTIONAL RIGS
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
700
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
Mechanical
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Wyoming
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
Mechanical
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
16,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
Mechanical
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Oklahoma
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Texas*
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
+
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
OFFSHORE PLATFORM RIGS
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Gulf of
Mexico
|
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
Self-Erecting
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Gulf of
Mexico
|
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
Tension-leg
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Gulf of
Mexico
|
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
Self-Erecting
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Gulf of
Mexico
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Gulf of
Mexico
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
Conventional
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Gulf of
Mexico
|
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
Tension-leg
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Gulf of
Mexico
|
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
Tension-leg
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Gulf of
Mexico
|
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
Tension-leg
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
*
|
|
Rig moved to Argentina in November, 2005
|
14
The following table sets forth information with respect to the
utilization of the Companys U.S. land and offshore drilling rigs for the periods indicated:
Years ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
U.S. Land
Rigs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
rigs owned at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
Average rig
utilization rate during period
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
%
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
|
|
81
|
%
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
U.S. Offshore
Platform Rigs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
rigs owned at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Average rig
utilization rate during period
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
%
|
|
|
83
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
(1)
|
|
A rig is considered to be utilized when it is operated or being
moved, assembled, or dismantled under contract.
|
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the
Companys international drilling rigs as of September 30, 2005:
Location
|
|
|
|
Rig
|
|
Optimum Depth
|
|
Rig Type
|
|
Drawworks:
Horsepower
|
Argentina
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Argentina
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Bolivia*
|
|
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
Bolivia
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
+
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
+
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Ecuador
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (Heli Rig)
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
Ecuador
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR (Heli Rig)
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Ecuador
|
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Ecuador
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
18,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Ecuador
|
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
1,700
|
|
Ecuador
|
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Ecuador
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Ecuador
|
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
26,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
+
|
|
|
SCR
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
*
|
|
Rig moved to Chile in the first quarter of fiscal
2006
|
15
The following table sets forth
information with respect to the utilization of the Companys international drilling rigs for the periods indicated:
Years ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
Number of
rigs owned at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Average rig
utilization rate during period
(1)(2)
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
(1)
|
|
A rig is considered to be utilized when it is operated or being
moved, assembled, or dismantled under contract.
|
(2)
|
|
Does not include rigs returned to United States for major
modifications and upgrades.
|
See Item 1. BUSINESS, pages 5 through 6 of this
Report.
Information required by this item regarding the stock portfolio
held by the Company may be found on page 24 of the Companys Annual Report under the caption, Managements Discussion & Analysis of
Results of Operations and Financial Condition.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is subject to various claims that arise in the
ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially
affect the financial position, results of operations, or liquidity of the Company. The Company is not a party to, and none of its property is subject
to, any material pending legal proceedings.
ITEM 4.
|
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF
SECURITY
HOLDERS
|
None.
ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The following table sets forth the names and ages of the
Companys executive officers, together with all positions and offices held with the Company by such executive officers. Officers are elected to
serve until the meeting of the Board of Directors following the next Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have been elected and
have qualified or until their earlier resignation or removal.
W. H. Helmerich, III, 82
Chairman of the Board
Director since 1949; Chairman of the Board since
1960
Hans Helmerich, 47
President and Chief Executive Officer
Director since 1987; President and Chief Executive Officer since
1989
George S. Dotson, 64
Vice President
Director since 1990; Vice President since 1977 and President and
Chief Operating Officer of Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. since 1977
Douglas E. Fears, 56
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
since 1988
Steven R. Mackey, 54
Vice President, Secretary and General
Counsel
Secretary since 1990; Vice President and General Counsel since
1988
16
Effective March 1, 2006, following the retirement of George S.
Dotson, John W. Lindsay and M. Alan Orr will serve as Executive Vice Presidents for Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. Mr. Lindsay will
become Executive Vice President, U.S. and International Operations, and Mr. Orr will serve as Executive Vice President, Engineering and
Development.
Mr. Lindsay, age 45, joined the Company in 1987 as a drilling
engineer. He has since served in various positions including operations manager for the Companys Mid-Continent region and division manager of
U.S. Land Operations. In 1997, Mr. Lindsay was appointed to his present position of Vice President, U.S. Land Operations, for Helmerich & Payne
International Drilling Co. Mr. Lindsay graduated in 1986 from the University of Tulsa, where he earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Petroleum
Engineering.
Mr. Orr, age 54, joined the Company in 1975 as a roughneck. In
his 30-year career, Mr. Orr has held various supervisory positions in the Companys domestic and international operations. In 1992, Mr. Orr was
appointed to his present position as Vice President and Chief Engineer for Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. Mr. Orr graduated from the
United States Military Academy at West Point in 1973, with a Bachelor of Science degree in General Engineering.
17
PART II
ITEM 5.
|
|
MARKET FOR THE COMPANYS COMMON STOCK AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
The principal market on which the Companys common stock is
traded is the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol HP. The high and low sale prices per share for the common stock for each quarterly
period during the past two fiscal years as reported in the NYSE-Composite Transaction quotations follow:
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
First
|
|
|
|
$
|
28.37
|
|
|
$
|
23.77
|
|
|
$
|
34.16
|
|
|
$
|
27.66
|
|
Second
|
|
|
|
|
30.61
|
|
|
|
27.02
|
|
|
|
41.10
|
|
|
|
31.57
|
|
Third
|
|
|
|
|
29.55
|
|
|
|
24.25
|
|
|
|
46.92
|
|
|
|
37.38
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
29.07
|
|
|
|
24.01
|
|
|
|
61.12
|
|
|
|
47.61
|
|
The Registrant paid quarterly cash dividends during the past two
years as shown in the following table:
|
|
|
|
Paid per Share
Fiscal
|
|
Total Payment
Fiscal
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
First
|
|
|
|
$
|
.080
|
|
|
$
|
.0825
|
|
|
$
|
4,011,879
|
|
|
$
|
4,165,965
|
|
Second
|
|
|
|
|
.080
|
|
|
|
.0825
|
|
|
|
4,017,204
|
|
|
|
4,213,594
|
|
Third
|
|
|
|
|
.080
|
|
|
|
.0825
|
|
|
|
4,032,709
|
|
|
|
4,226,835
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
.0825
|
|
|
|
.0825
|
|
|
|
4,160,221
|
|
|
|
4,259,852
|
|
The Company paid a cash dividend of $0.0825 per share on December 1, 2005, to shareholders of record on November 15, 2005. Payment of future
dividends will depend on earnings and other factors.
As of December 5, 2005, there were 808 record holders of the
Companys common stock as listed by the transfer agents records.
SUMMARY OF ALL EXISTING EQUITY COMPENSATION
PLANS
The following chart sets forth information concerning the equity
compensation plans of the Company as of September 30, 2005.
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
Number of securities
to be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options,
warrants and rights
|
|
Number of securities remaining
available for future
issuance under
equity compensation plans (excluding
securities reflected in column (a))
|
Plan
Category
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
(b)
|
|
(c)
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
3,244,073
|
|
|
$
|
24.566
|
|
|
|
754,505
|
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
3,244,073
|
|
|
$
|
24.566
|
|
|
|
754,505
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes the 1990 Stock Option Plan, the 1996 Stock Incentive
Plan and the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan of the Company.
|
(2)
|
|
The Company does not maintain any equity compensation plans
that have not been approved by the stockholders.
|
18
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table summarizes selected financial information and
should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto and the related Managements Discussion &
Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition contained on pages 8 through 32 of the Companys Annual Report. On September 30, 2002,
the Company spun off Cimarex Energy Co. The historical financial data for the business conducted by Cimarex Energy Co. for 2002 has been reported as
discontinued operations which is not included in the five-year summary of selected financial data.
FIVE-YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands except per share
amounts)
|
|
Operating
revenues
|
|
|
|
$
|
528,187
|
|
|
$
|
523,418
|
|
|
$
|
504,223
|
|
|
$
|
589,056
|
|
|
$
|
800,726
|
|
Asset
Impairment Charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other*
|
|
|
|
|
15,266
|
|
|
|
28,925
|
|
|
|
11,783
|
|
|
|
32,957
|
|
|
|
46,093
|
|
Income from
continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
80,467
|
|
|
|
53,706
|
|
|
|
17,873
|
|
|
|
4,359
|
|
|
|
127,606
|
|
Income from continuing operations per
common share:
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
1.08
|
|
|
|
0.36
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
|
|
0.35
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
|
|
1,300,121
|
|
|
|
1,227,313
|
|
|
|
1,417,770
|
|
|
|
1,406,844
|
|
|
|
1,663,350
|
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Cash dividends
declared per common share
|
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
0.3225
|
|
|
|
0.33
|
|
*
|
|
Other includes gain on sale of assets and investment securities,
interest income and dividend income.
|
ITEM 7.
|
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION & ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION
|
Information required by this item may be found on pages 8
through 32 of the Companys Annual Report under the caption Managements Discussion & Analysis of Results of Operations and
Financial Condition.
ITEM 7A.
|
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
|
Information required by this item may be found under the caption
Risk Factors beginning on page 7 of this Report and on the following pages of the Companys Annual Report under Managements
Discussion & Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition and in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements:
MARKET RISK
|
|
|
|
PAGE
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
|
|
|
|
29-31
|
Commodity Price Risk
|
|
|
|
31
|
Interest Rate Risk
|
|
|
|
31-32
|
Equity Price Risk
|
|
|
|
32
|
19
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY
DATA
Information required by this item may be found on pages 34
through 63 of the Companys Annual Report.
ITEM 9.
|
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING
AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the Companys management, under the supervision and with the
participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
believe that:
|
|
the Companys disclosure controls and procedures are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms; and
|
|
|
the Companys disclosure controls and procedures operate
such that important information flows to appropriate collection and disclosure points in a timely manner and are effective to ensure that such
information is accumulated and communicated to the Companys management, and made known to the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, particularly during the period when this Annual Report on Form 10-K was prepared, as appropriate to allow timely decision regarding
the required disclosure.
|
(b) Managements Report of Internal Control over
Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Companys internal control over financial reporting is designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The Companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that:
(i)
|
|
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
|
(ii)
|
|
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures
of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the Board of Directors of the Company; and
|
(iii)
|
|
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
|
Because of its inherent limitations,
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk
20
that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management, with the participation of
the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted its evaluation of the effectiveness of internal controls over
financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission. This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of
the operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this evaluation. Although there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system
of internal controls over financial reporting, based on the Companys evaluation, management has concluded that the Companys internal
controls over financial reporting were effective as of September 30, 2005.
The Companys registered public
accounting firm that audited the Companys financial statements, Ernst & Young LLP, has issued a report on managements assessment of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting. This report appears below.
21
Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting
Firm
Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Helmerich & Payne,
Inc.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the
accompanying Managements Report of Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Helmerich & Payne, Inc. maintained effective internal
control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Helmerich and Payne, Inc.s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions
and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only
in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition,
22
use, or disposition of the companys assets that could
have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the
risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Helmerich &
Payne, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based
on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Helmerich & Payne, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of September 30, 2005, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. as of September 30, 2005 and
2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
September 30, 2005 and our report dated December 1, 2005, except for Note 15, as to which the date is December 7, 2005, expressed an unqualified
opinion thereon.
Tulsa, Oklahoma
December 1, 2005
(c) Changes in Internal Controls. There have been no
changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting during the Companys last fiscal quarter of 2005 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
23
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10.
|
|
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF
THE
COMPANY
|
Information required under this item with respect to Directors
and with respect to delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is incorporated by reference from the Companys definitive Proxy
Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held March 1, 2006, to be filed with the Commission not later than 120 days after September 30,
2005. The information required by this Item with respect to the Companys Executive Officers appears on pages 16 and 17 of this
Report.
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for Principal Executive
Officers and Senior Financial Officers. The text of such Code is located on the Companys website under Investor Relations Corporate
Governance. The Companys Internet address is www.hpinc.com.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
This information is incorporated by reference from the
Companys definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held March 1, 2006, to be filed with the Commission not later
than 120 days after September 30, 2005.
ITEM 12.
|
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
This information is incorporated by reference from the
Companys definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held March 1, 2006, to be filed with the Commission not later
than 120 days after September 30, 2005.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS
This information is incorporated by reference from the
Companys definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held March 1, 2006, to be filed with the Commission not later
than 120 days after September 30, 2005.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND
SERVICES
This information is incorporated by reference from the
Companys definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held March 1, 2006, to be filed with the Commission not later
than 120 days after September 30, 2005.
24
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT
SCHEDULES
a)
1.
|
|
Financial Statements: The following appear in the
Companys Annual Report on the pages indicated below and are incorporated herein by reference:
|
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
33
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income for the Years Ended September 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
34
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at September 30, 2005 and 2004
|
|
|
|
35-36
|
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders Equity for the Years Ended September 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
37
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended September 30, 2005, 2004 and 2003
|
|
|
|
38
|
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
39-63
|
2.
|
|
Financial Statement Schedules: All schedules are omitted
as inapplicable or because the required information is contained in the financial statements or included in the notes thereto.
|
3.
|
|
Exhibits. The following documents are included as exhibits
to this Form 10-K. Exhibits incorporated herein are duly noted as such. Unless so noted, each exhibit is filed herewith.
|
3.1
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation and Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 1996, SEC File No. 001-04221.
3.2
Amended and Restated By-Laws
of the Company are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, SEC File No. 001-04221.
4.1
Rights Agreement dated as of January 8, 1996, between
the Company and The Liberty National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, N.A. is incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Form 8-A,
dated January 18, 1996, SEC File No. 001-04221.
4.2
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement dated December 8,
2005, between the Company and UMB Bank, N.A. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on December 12,
2005.
*
10.1
Consulting Services Agreement between W. H.
Helmerich, III, and the Company effective January 1, 1990, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 1996, SEC File No. 001-04221.
*
10.2
Supplemental Retirement Income Plan for Salaried
Employees of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the
Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 1996, SEC File No. 001-04221.
*
10.3
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan
is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for
fiscal 1996, SEC File No. 001-04221.
*
10.4
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for the
1990 Stock Option Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Companys Registration Statement No. 33-55239 on Form S-8, dated August
26, 1994.
25
*
10.5
Supplemental Savings Plan for Salaried Employees of
Helmerich and Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and
Exchange Commission for fiscal 1999, SEC File No. 001-04221.
*
10.6
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive
Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Registration Statement No. 333-34939 on Form S-8 dated September 4,
1997.
*
10.7
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for the
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Companys Registration Statement No.
333-34939 on Form S-8 dated September 4, 1997.
*
10.8
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for the Helmerich
& Payne, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the
Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 1997, SEC File No. 001-04221.
*
10.9
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive
Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Registration Statement No. 333-63124 on Form S-8 dated June 15,
2001.
*
10.10
Form of Agreements for Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
2000 Stock Incentive Plan being (i) Restricted Stock Award Agreement, (ii) Incentive Stock Option Agreement and (iii) Nonqualified Stock Option
Agreement are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Companys Registration Statement No. 333-63124 on Form S-8 dated June 15,
2001.
*
10.11
Form of Director Nonqualified Stock Option
Agreement for the 2000 Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, SEC File No. 001-04221.
*
10.12
Form of Change of Control Agreement for Helmerich
& Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and
Exchange Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, SEC File No. 001-04221.
10.13
Credit Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2002, among
Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., Helmerich & Payne, Inc., the several lenders from time to time party thereto, and Bank of
Oklahoma, N.A. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, SEC File No. 001-04221.
10.14
First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated July 15,
2003, among Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., and Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.
10.15
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated May 4,
2004, among Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., and Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.
10.16
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated July 13,
2004, among Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., and Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.
10.17
Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated July 12,
2005, among Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., and Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on July 13, 2005, SEC File No. 001-04221.
10.18
Note Purchase Agreement dated as of August 15, 2002,
among Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., Helmerich & Payne, Inc. and various insurance companies is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.20 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 2002, SEC File No.
001-04221.
26
10.19
Office Lease dated May 30, 2003, between K/B Fund IV
and Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities
and Exchange Commission for fiscal 2003, SEC File No. 001-04221.
*
10.20
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Director Deferred
Compensation Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2004.
10.21
Shareholders Agreement and Registration Rights
Agreement dated July 19, 2004 between Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and Atwood Oceanics, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 1.1 of the Companys Amended Schedule 13D filed on July 21, 2004.
10.22
Underwriting Agreement dated October 13, 2004,
between Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and various underwriters is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of the
Companys Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2004.
*
10.23
Amended and restated Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
Annual Bonus Plan for Executive Officers, together with fiscal 2005 Executive Officer compensation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on December 9,
2005.
13.
The Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for
fiscal 2005.
21.
List of Subsidiaries of the Company.
23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*
|
|
Management or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement.
|
27
28
Exhibit Index
3.1
Restated Certificate of
Incorporation and Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 1996, SEC File No. 001-04221.
3.2
Amended and Restated By-Laws
of the Company are incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, SEC File No. 001-04221.
4.1
Rights Agreement dated as of January 8, 1996, between
the Company and The Liberty National Bank and Trust Company of Oklahoma City, N.A. is incorporated herein by reference to the Companys Form 8-A,
dated January 18, 1996, SEC File No. 001-04221.
4.2
Amendment No. 1 to Rights Agreement dated December 8,
2005 between the Company and VMB Bank, N.A. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on December 12,
2005.
*
10.1
Consulting Services Agreement between W. H.
Helmerich, III, and the Company effective January 1, 1990, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 1996, SEC File No. 001-04221.
*
10.2
Supplemental Retirement Income Plan for Salaried
Employees of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the
Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 1996, SEC File No. 001-04221.
*
10.3
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan
is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for
fiscal 1996, SEC File No. 001-04221.
*
10.4
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for the
1990 Stock Option Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Companys Registration Statement No. 33-55239 on Form S-8, dated August
26, 1994.
*
10.5
Supplemental Savings Plan for Salaried Employees of
Helmerich and Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and
Exchange Commission for fiscal 1999, SEC File No. 001-04221.
*
10.6
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive
Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Registration Statement No. 333-34939 on Form S-8 dated September 4,
1997.
*
10.7
Form of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for the
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Companys Registration Statement No.
333-34939 on Form S-8 dated September 4, 1997.
*
10.8
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for the Helmerich
& Payne, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the
Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 1997, SEC File No. 001-04221.
*
10.9
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive
Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Companys Registration Statement No. 333-63124 on Form S-8 dated June 15,
2001.
*
10.10
Form of Agreements for Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
2000 Stock Incentive Plan being (i) Restricted Stock Award Agreement, (ii) Incentive Stock Option Agreement and (iii) Nonqualified Stock Option
Agreement are incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Companys Registration Statement No. 333-63124 on Form S-8 dated June 15,
2001.
*
10.11
Form of Director Nonqualified Stock Option
Agreement for the 2000 Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Stock Incentive Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, SEC File No. 001-04221.
*
10.12
Form of Change of Control Agreement for Helmerich
& Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and
Exchange Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, SEC File No. 001-04221.
10.13
Credit Agreement, dated as of July 16, 2002, among
Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., Helmerich & Payne, Inc., the several lenders from time to time party thereto, and Bank of
Oklahoma, N.A. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to the Securities and Exchange
Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2002, SEC File No. 001-04221.
10.14
First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated July 15,
2003, among Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., and Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.
10.15
Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated May 4,
2004, among Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., and Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.
10.16
Third Amendment to Credit Agreement dated July 13,
2004, among Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., and Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.
10.17
Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement dated July 12,
2005, among Helmerich & Payne, Inc., Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., and Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. is incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on July 13, 2005, SEC File No. 001-04221.
10.18
Note Purchase Agreement dated as of August 15, 2002,
among Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., Helmerich & Payne, Inc. and various insurance companies is incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.20 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and Exchange Commission for fiscal 2002, SEC File No.
001-04221.
10.19
Office Lease dated May 30, 2003, between K/B Fund IV
and Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K to the Securities
and Exchange Commission for fiscal 2003, SEC File No. 001-04221.
*
10.20
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Director Deferred
Compensation Plan is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on September 9, 2004.
10.21
Shareholders Agreement and Registration Rights
Agreement dated July 19, 2004 between Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and Atwood Oceanics, Inc. is incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 1.1 of the Companys Amended Schedule 13D filed on July 21, 2004.
10.22
Underwriting Agreement dated October 13, 2004,
between Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. and various underwriters is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.1 of the
Companys Form 8-K filed on October 14, 2004.
*
10.23
Amended and restated Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
Annual Bonus Plan for Executive Officers, together with fiscal 2005 Executive Officer compensation, is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Companys Form 8-K filed on December 9,
2005.
13.
The Companys Annual Report to Shareholders for
fiscal 2005.
21.
List of Subsidiaries of the Company.
23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm.
31.1
Certification of Chief Executive Officer, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2
Certification of Chief Financial Officer, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
*
|
|
Management or Compensatory Plan or Arrangement.
|
Exhibit 10.14
FIRST AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this "Amendment") is made and entered into effective as of July 15, 2003 (the "
Effective Date
"), by and among HELMERICH & PAYNE INTERNATIONAL DRILLING CO., a Delaware corporation (the "
Borrower
"), HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC., a Delaware corporation (the "
Parent
"), the Persons identified as a "Lender" on the signature pages of this Amendment (the "
Lenders
"), and BANK OF OKLAHOMA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Administrative Agent for the Lenders (in such capacity, the "
Administrative Agent
"), with reference to the following:
RECITALS
A. The Borrower, the Parent, the Lenders and the Administrative Agent are parties to that certain Credit Agreement dated July 16, 2002 (the "
Credit Agreement
"). Capitalized terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined herein have the respective meanings assigned to them in the Credit Agreement, and the rules of construction set forth in the Credit Agreement shall also govern the construction and interpretation of this Amendment.
B. Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the Lenders established the Facility in favor of the Borrower.
C. The Borrower has requested that the Lenders (i) extend the Revolving Commitment Termination Date to July 13, 2004, (ii) extend the Facility Maturity Date to June 30, 2006, and (iii) increase the LOC Committed Amount from $25,000,000 to $35,000,000.
D. The Lenders have agreed to the foregoing requests, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby amend the Credit Agreement as follows:
1.
|
EXTENSION OF THE FACILITY
. As of the Effective Date:
|
(i) the Revolving Commitment Termination Date as defined in Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreement is extended to July 13, 2004 and the definition of "Revolving Commitment Termination Date" appearing in Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
"
Revolving Commitment Termination Date
" means July 13, 2004, or such later date to which the Revolving Commitment Termination Date may be extended from time to time pursuant to Section 2.5(c).
(ii) the Facility Maturity Date is extended to June 30, 2006, and the reference to "June 30, 2005" appearing in the definition of "Facility Maturity Date" in Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreement is amended to read "June 30, 2006";
2.
INCREASE OF LOC COMMITTED AMOUNT
. As of the Effective Date, the amount of the LOC Committed Amount shall be increased to $35,000,000. Accordingly, the reference to "$25,000,000" appearing in the definition of "LOC Committed Amount" in Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreement is amended to read "$35,000,000."
3.
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT
. The modifications to the Credit Agreement set forth in this Amendment shall be effective from and after the Effective Date, but only when each of the following conditions precedent shall have been satisfied:
A.
Execution of Documents
. This Amendment and such other documents or instruments as may be contemplated by this Amendment or as may be reasonably necessary to effectuate the intent and purposes of this Amendment shall have been duly and validly authorized, and executed by the parties thereto and delivered to the Administrative Agent, all in form and substance satisfactory to the Lenders.
B.
No Defaults
. There shall not have occurred or be continuing any Default or Event of Default.
C.
Legal Matters
. All legal matters incident to this Amendment and the transactions contemplated hereby shall be satisfactory to the Administrative Agent and each of the Lenders.
4.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
. The Borrower and the Parent confirm that (i) except as forth in Schedules 6.12(ii) and 6.13(d) attached hereto (relating to the representations and warranties set forth in Sections 6.12(ii) and 6.13(d), respectively, of the Credit Agreement) and except for the fact that the spin-off of Cimarex Energy Co. and related entities was consummated on September 30, 2002, all representations and warranties made by each of the Borrower and the Parent for themselves or on behalf of a Credit Party in Article VI of the Credit Agreement are and will be true and correct on the Effective Date (with the dates appearing in the first sentence of Section 6.5 thereof being changed to read September 30, 2000, September 30, 2001, and September 30, 2002, and March 31, 2003,
respectively, and the date appearing in the final sentence of Section 6.5 thereof being changed to read September 30, 2002), and all of such representations and warranties are hereby remade and restated as of the date hereof and shall survive the execution and delivery of this Amendment, and (ii) except as set forth in Schedules 2.6(a) and 7.6 attached hereto, all of the schedules incorporated into and forming a part of the Credit Agreement are true, accurate and complete in all material respects as of the Effective Date.
A.
Effect of Amendment
. The terms of this Amendment shall be incorporated into and form a part of the Credit Agreement. Except as amended, modified and supplemented by this Amendment, the Credit Agreement shall continue in full force and effect in accordance with its
2
original stated
terms, all of which are hereby reaffirmed in every respect as of the date hereof. In the
event of any irreconcilable inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment and the
terms of the Credit Agreement or any other Credit Document, the terms of this Amendment
shall control and govern, and the agreements shall be interpreted so as to carry out and
give full effect to the intent of this Amendment. All references to the "Credit
Agreement" appearing in any of the Credit Documents shall hereafter be deemed
references to the Credit Agreement as amended, modified and supplemented by this
Amendment. The Borrower and the Parent each hereby reaffirm all Credit Documents to which
it is a party, and acknowledge that such Credit Documents will continue in full force and
effect, unabated and uninterrupted, and will remain its valid and binding obligations,
enforceable in accordance with their terms.
B.
Schedules.
Schedules 6.12(ii) and 6.13(d) attached hereto are hereby incorporated into the Credit Agreement with the same designations, and Schedules 2.6(a) and 7.6 attached hereto are hereby substituted for the corresponding schedules to the Credit Agreement.
C.
Revolving Commitment Amount
. The amount of each Lender's Revolving Commitment shall remain the same and is set forth on the signature pages to this Amendment.
D.
No Course of Dealing
. This Amendment shall not establish a course of dealing or be construed as evidence of any willingness on any of the Lenders' part to grant other or future extensions or modifications, should any be requested.
E.
Descriptive Headings
. The descriptive headings of the several sections of this Amendment are inserted for convenience only and shall not be used in the construction of the content of this Amendment.
F.
Governing Law
. This Amendment shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and the rights of the parties shall be governed by, the laws of the State of Oklahoma.
G.
Reimbursement of Expenses
. The Borrower and the Parent agree, jointly and severally, to pay the reasonable fees and out-of-pocket expenses of Crowe & Dunlevy, counsel to the Administrative Agent, incurred in connection with the preparation of this Amendment and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby.
H.
Counterpart Execution
. This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original hereof and all of which shall be but one and the same original instrument.
[REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. SIGNATURE
PAGES TO FOLLOW.]
3
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused a counterpart of this Amendment to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written, effective as of the Effective Date.
BORROWER
:
|
HELMERICH & PAYNE INTERNATIONAL
|
DRILLING CO.,
a Delaware corporation
By:
|
__________________________
|
Name:
|
Douglas E. Fears
|
Title:
|
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARENT
:
|
HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC.,
|
a Delaware corporation
By:
|
__________________________
|
Name:
|
Douglas E. Fears
|
Title:
|
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
:
|
BANK OF OKLAHOMA, NATIONAL
|
ASSOCIATION
By:
|
____________________________
|
Name:
|
__________________________
|
Title:
|
__________________________
|
|
|
|
LENDERS
:
|
BANK OF OKLAHOMA, NATIONAL
|
ASSOCIATION
By:
|
____________________________
|
Name:
|
__________________________
|
Title:
|
__________________________
|
|
|
|
Revolving Commitment
:
$50,000,000
4
WELLS FARGO BANK TEXAS, N.A.
|
By:
|
____________________________
|
Name:
|
____________________________
|
Title:
|
__________________________
|
|
|
|
Revolving Commitment
:
$30,000,000
By:
|
____________________________
|
Name:
|
____________________________
|
Title:
|
__________________________
|
|
|
|
Revolving Commitment
:
$20,000,000
By:
|
____________________________
|
Name:
|
____________________________
|
Title:
|
__________________________
|
|
|
|
Revolving Commitment
:
$15,000,000
By: ________________________
Name: ______________________
Title: _______________________
Revolving Commitment
:
$10,000,000
5
List of Additional and Replacement Schedules
Schedule 2.6(a)
|
-
|
Existing Letters of Credit
|
Schedule 6.12(ii)
|
-
|
ERISA Matters
|
|
Schedule 6.13(d)
|
-
|
Regulation O
|
|
Schedule 7.6
|
-
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
SCHEDULE 2.6(a)
EXISTING LETTERS OF CREDIT
Letters of Credit
:
BOK00SDF06739
Amount:
|
$12,000,000.00
|
|
Expiry:
|
03/09/04
|
|
Beneficiary:
|
National Union Fire (AIG)
|
|
|
|
|
BOK00SIF05082
Amount:
|
$1,087,260.00
|
|
Expiry:
|
12/30/03
|
|
Beneficiary:
|
Banco Bisa Lapaz Bolivia
|
|
|
|
|
SCHEDULE 6.12(ii)
ERISA Matters
As of September 30, 2002, Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Employees Retirement Plan benefit obligations totaled $68,134,000 and the value of plan assets totaled $48,286,000.
SCHEDULE 6.13(d)
Regulation O
Ms. Paula Marshall-Chapman and Mr. L. F. Rooney, III are directors of both the Parent and Bank of Oklahoma, NA.
SCHEDULE 7.6
Insurance
Exhibit 10.15
|
John
M. Tyson
Vice President
(918) 595-3189
(918) 280-3368 (fax)
|
May 4, 2004
Helmerich & Payne
International Drilling Co.
1437 South Boulder Avenue
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119
Attention: Mr.
Douglas E. Fears, Vice President
Re:
Second
Amendment to Credit Agreement
Gentlemen/Ladies:
Reference
is made to the Credit Agreement dated July 16, 2002, between Helmerich &
Payne International Drilling Co. (the Borrower), Helmerich &
Payne, Inc., the several Lenders from time to time thereto (the
Lenders) and Bank of Oklahoma, National Association, as
Administrative Agent (the Administrative Agent), as amended by that
certain First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated July 15, 2003 (the Credit
Agreement, as amended by the First Amendment thereto, is hereinafter referred to
as the Credit Agreement). Capitalized terms used in this letter and
not otherwise defined have the meanings assigned to them in the Credit
Agreement. BOk refers to Bank of Oklahoma, National Association, as
a Lender under the Credit Agreement.
This
letter will serve to confirm that (i) pursuant to Section 2.5(a) of the Credit
Agreement, the Borrower has given proper written notice to the Administrative
Agent of the Borrowers intent to reduce the Aggregate Revolving Committed
Amount from $125,000,000.00 to $50,000,000.00, effective as of May 4, 2004, and
that (ii) effective as of May 4, 2004, each of the Lenders (other than BOk) has
transferred and assigned to BOk all of their rights and obligations under the
Credit Agreement, including the Notes originally executed and delivered to such
other Lenders pursuant to the Credit Agreement. Accordingly, as of May 4, 2004:
(i) the Aggregated Revolving Committed Amount is $50,000,000.00; (ii) BOk is the
sole lender under the Credit Agreement, having a Revolving Committed Amount of
$50,000,000.00; (iii) the Notes executed and delivered by the Borrower to each
of the other Lenders have been assigned to BOk and will be cancelled by BOk; and
(iv) the Borrowers Note dated July 16, 2002, payable to the order of BOk
in the stated principal amount of $50,000,000.00 is the only Note outstanding
under the Credit Agreement evidencing the Revolving Loans.
May 4, 2004
Page 2
Further,
the Credit Agreement is amended as follows, effective immediately:
|
(A)
|
the
Non-Use Fee described in Section 3.2(a) of the Credit Agreement is hereby deleted;
|
|
(B)
|
Section 7.12 (Liquidity
Maintenance) of the Credit Agreement is hereby deleted; and
|
|
(C)
|
All references in the Credit
Agreement to the Swingline Commitment, the
Swingline Loans and the Swingline Commitment, and all provisions of the Credit
Agreement pertaining to the Swingline Commitment and the Swingline Loans
(including Section 2.1(c), will have no further force or effect for so long as
BOk is the only Lender under the Credit Agreement.
|
This
letter agreement is intended to be and shall be construed as an amendment to the
Credit Agreement. The remaining terms, provisions and conditions set forth in
the Credit Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
Please
indicate your concurrence with the foregoing where indicated below. This letter
agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be
deemed an original and all of which shall constitute a single agreement. This
letter agreement may be executed in counterparts. Transmission by facsimile of
an executed counterpart of this letter agreement shall be deemed to constitute
due and sufficient delivery of such counterpart and such facsimile shall be
deemed to be an original counterpart of this letter agreement.
|
Very
truly yours,
BANK OF OKLAHOMA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Lender and as
Administrative Agent
By:____________________________
John M. Tyson, Vice President
|
ACCEPTED AND
AGREED TO EFFECTIVE AS OF MAY 4, 2004:
HELMERICH & PAYNE
INTERNATIONAL DRILLING CO.
By:________________________________
Name:_____________________________
Title:______________________________
May 4, 2004
Page 3
ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO EFFECTIVE AS OF MAY 4, 2004:
HELMERICH & PAYNE,
INC.
By:________________________________
Name:_____________________________
Title:______________________________
Exhibit 10.16
THIRD
AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT
THIS
THIRD AMENDMENT TO CREDIT AGREEMENT (this Amendment) is made and
entered into effective as of July 13, 2004 (the
Effective
Date
), by and among HELMERICH & PAYNE INTERNATIONAL DRILLING CO.,
a Delaware corporation (the
Borrower
), HELMERICH & PAYNE,
INC., a Delaware corporation (the
Parent
), and BANK OF
OKLAHOMA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Lender (in such capacity, the
Lender
) and as Administrative Agent (in such capacity, the
Administrative Agent
), with reference to the following:
RECITALS
A.
The Borrower, the Parent, the Lender and the Administrative Agent are parties to
that certain Credit Agreement dated July 16, 2002, as amended by that certain
First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated July 15, 2003, and as further amended
by that certain Second Amendment to Credit Agreement dated May 4, 2004 (the
Credit Agreement, as amended by the First and Second Amendments thereto, is
hereinafter referred to as the
Credit Agreement
). Capitalized
terms used in this Amendment and not otherwise defined herein have the
respective meanings assigned to them in the Credit Agreement, and the rules of
construction set forth in the Credit Agreement shall also govern the
construction and interpretation of this Amendment.
B.
Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, the Lender established the Facility in favor of the
Borrower.
C.
The Borrower has requested that the Lender (i) extend the Revolving Commitment
Termination Date from July 13, 2004, to July 12, 2005, and (ii) extend the
Facility Maturity Date from June 30, 2006, to June 30, 2007.
D.
The Lender has agreed to the foregoing requests, subject to the terms and conditions
set forth in this Amendment.
NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants and
agreements herein contained, and for other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby amend
the Credit Agreement as follows:
|
1.
|
EXTENSION
OF THE FACILITY
. As of the Effective Date:
|
|
(i)
|
the
Revolving Commitment Termination Date is extended from July 13, 2004, to July 12, 2005,
and the definition of Revolving Commitment Termination Date appearing in
Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
|
|
Revolving
Commitment Termination Date
means July 12, 2005, or such later date
to which the Revolving Commitment Termination Date may be extended from time to time
pursuant to Section 2.5(c).
|
|
(ii)
|
the
Facility Maturity Date is extended from June 30, 2006, to June 30, 2007, and the
definition of Facility Maturity Date appearing in Section 1.1 of the Credit
Agreement is amended in its entirety to read as follows:
|
|
Facility
Maturity Date means June 30, 2007, or such later date to which the Facility
Maturity Date may be extended from time to time pursuant to Section 2.5(c).
|
2.
CONDITIONS
PRECEDENT
. The modifications to the Credit Agreement set forth in this Amendment
shall be effective from and after the Effective Date, but only when each of the
following conditions precedent shall have been satisfied:
A.
Execution
of Documents
. This Amendment and such other documents or instruments as may be
contemplated by this Amendment or as may be reasonably necessary to effectuate the
intent and purposes of this Amendment shall have been duly and validly authorized and
executed by the parties thereto and delivered to the Administrative Agent, all in form
and substance satisfactory to the Lender.
B.
No Defaults. There shall not have occurred or be continuing any Default or Event of
Default.
C.
Legal Matters. All legal matters incident to this Amendment and the transactions
contemplated hereby shall be satisfactory to the Administrative Agent and the Lender.
3.
REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
. The Borrower and the Parent confirm
that, to the best of their knowledge, without inquiry: (i)
except as forth in Schedule 6.12(ii) attached hereto (relating to the
representations and warranties set forth in Sections 6.12(ii) of the Credit
Agreement) and except for the fact that the spin-off of Cimarex Energy Co. and
related entities was consummated on September 30, 2002, all representations and
warranties made by each of the Borrower and the Parent for themselves or on
behalf of a Credit Party in Article VI of the Credit Agreement are and will be
true and correct in all material respects on the Effective
Date (with the dates appearing in the first sentence of Section 6.5 thereof
being changed to read September 30, 2001, September 30, 2002, September 30,
2003, and March 31, 2004, respectively, and the date appearing in the final
sentence of Section 6.5 thereof being changed to read September 30, 2003),
and (ii) except as set forth in Schedules 2.6(a) and 7.6 attached
hereto, all of the schedules incorporated into and forming a part of the Credit
Agreement are true, accurate and complete in all material respects as of the
Effective Date.
4.
GENERAL
.
A.
Effect
of Amendment
. The terms of this Amendment shall be incorporated into and
form a part of the Credit Agreement. Except as amended, modified and
supplemented by this Amendment, the Credit Agreement shall continue in full
force and effect in accordance with its
original stated
terms, all of which are hereby reaffirmed in every respect as of the date hereof. In the
event of any irreconcilable inconsistency between the terms of this Amendment and the
terms of the Credit Agreement or any other Credit Document, the terms of this Amendment
shall control and govern, and the agreements shall be interpreted so as to carry out and
give full effect to the intent of this Amendment. All references to the Credit
Agreement appearing in any of the Credit Documents shall hereafter be deemed
references to the Credit Agreement as amended, modified and supplemented by this
Amendment. The Borrower and the Parent each hereby reaffirm all Credit Documents to
which it is a party, and acknowledge that such Credit Documents will continue in full
force and effect, unabated and uninterrupted, and will remain its valid and binding
obligations, enforceable in accordance with their terms.
B.
Schedules. Schedules 2.6(a), 6.12(ii) and 7.6 attached hereto are hereby substituted
for the corresponding schedules to the Credit Agreement.
C.
No Course of Dealing. This Amendment shall not establish a course of dealing or be
construed as evidence of any willingness on the Lenders part to grant other or
future extensions or modifications, should any be requested.
D.
Descriptive Headings. The descriptive headings of the several sections of this
Amendment are inserted for convenience only and shall not be used in the construction of
the content of this Amendment.
E.
Governing Law. This Amendment shall be construed and enforced in accordance with,
and the rights of the parties shall be governed by, the laws of the State of Oklahoma.
F.
Reimbursement of Expenses. The Borrower and the Parent agree, jointly and severally, to
pay the reasonable fees and out-of-pocket expenses of Crowe & Dunlevy, counsel to the
Administrative Agent, incurred in connection with the preparation of this Amendment
and the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby.
G.
Counterpart Execution. This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each
of which shall be deemed an original hereof and all of which shall be but one and the
same original instrument.
[REMAINDER OF
PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. SIGNATURE PAGES TO FOLLOW.]
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused a counterpart of this Amendment
to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written, effective as of
the Effective Date.
BORROWER:
|
HELMERICH & PAYNE INTERNATIONAL DRILLING CO.,
a Delaware corporation
By: ___________________
Name:
Douglas E. Fears
Title:
Vice President
|
PARENT:
|
HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC.,
a Delaware corporation
By: ___________________
Name:
Douglas E. Fears
Title:
Vice President
|
ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT:
|
BANK OF OKLAHOMA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By: ___________________
Name: _________________
Title: __________________
|
LENDER:
|
BANK OF OKLAHOMA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
By: ___________________
Name: _________________
Title: __________________
|
Revolving
Commitment:
$50,000,000
List of
Additional and Replacement Schedules
Schedule 2.6(a)
|
-
|
Existing Letters of Credit
|
Schedule 6.12(ii)
|
-
|
ERISA Matters
|
Schedule 7.6
|
-
|
Insurance
|
Exhibit 10.16
SCHEDULE
2.6(a)
EXISTING LETTERS
OF CREDIT
Letters of Credit:
BOK00SDF06739
|
Amount:
|
$12,000,000.00
|
Expiry:
|
03/09/04
|
Beneficiary:
|
National Union Fire (AIG)
|
BOK00SIF05082
Amount:
|
$1,087,260.00
|
Expiry:
|
12/30/03
|
Beneficiary:
|
Banco
Bisa Lapaz Bolivia
|
[***TO
BE UPDATED BY THE COMPANY***]SCHEDULE 6.12(ii)
ERISA
Matters
As of
September 30, 2003, Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Employees Retirement Plan
benefit obligations totaled $___________ and the value of plan assets totaled
$_____________.
[***TO
BE UPDATED BY THE COMPANY***]SCHEDULE 7.6
Insurance
[***TO BE
UPDATED BY THE COMPANY***]
------------------
COMPARISON OF HEADERS ------------------
-HEADER 1-
-HEADER 2-
Header Discontinued
------------------
COMPARISON OF FOOTERS ------------------
-FOOTER 1-
2
1365753
-FOOTER 2-
T
-FOOTER 3-
Footer Discontinued
This redlined
draft, generated by CompareRite (TM) - The Instant Redliner, shows the differences
between - original document:
C:\DOCUME~1\BETOWG\LOCALS~1\TEMP\CROWE_HQ-#1365753-V1-BOK-HELMERICH;_THIRD_AMENDMENT_TO_CREDIT_AGREEMENT;_JUNE_04.DOC
and revised document:
C:\DOCUME~1\BETOWG\LOCALS~1\TEMP\CROWE_HQ-#1365753-V2-BOK-HELMERICH;_THIRD_AMENDMENT_TO_CREDIT_AGREEMENT;_JUNE_04.DOC
CompareRite found 3 change(s) in the text
CompareRite found 0 change(s) in the notes
Deletions appear as Overstrike text
Additions appear as Bold+Dbl Underline text
Exhibit 13
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
|
|
Annual Report for Fiscal 2005
|
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
is the holding Company for
Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., an international drilling contractor with land and offshore platform operations in the United States,
South America, and Africa. Holdings also include commercial real estate properties in the Tulsa, Oklahoma, area and an energy-weighted portfolio of
publicly-traded securities valued at approximately $293 million as of September 30, 2005.
Years Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Operating
Revenues
|
|
|
|
$
|
800,726
|
|
|
$
|
589,056
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
|
|
127,606
|
|
|
|
4,359
|
|
Diluted
Earnings per Share
|
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
.09
|
|
Dividends
Paid per Share
|
|
|
|
|
.33
|
|
|
|
.3225
|
|
Capital
Expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
86,805
|
|
|
|
90,212
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
1,663,350
|
|
|
|
1,406,844
|
|
1
To the Co-owners
of Helmerich & Payne,
Inc.:
The Companys 2005 performance represents an all-time high
in our 85-year history in terms of income from continuing operations. We reached another important milestone with the announcement of our 50
th
new-build order for FlexRigs®. Seventy-five percent of our fleet has been built since
1995, and these new rigs will only improve on that strength.
Our goal can be plainly stated and is consistent with a
long-term, Company-wide resolve: To provide our customers with the most innovative and advanced rigs in the industry for the purpose of driving their
well costs down. Combined with best in field execution performance, safety, and reliability we believe H&P delivers a compelling
value proposition.
Those satisfied customers, in turn, provide us with unique growth
opportunities and improved shareholder returns. The operators willingness to make long-term commitments provides an encouraging lens on how
customers perceive the unusual and potential longevity of this current cycle. Our financial strength and ample liquidity also enable us to fund organic
growth going forward.
The meaningfulness of that internally generated growth is
underscored by these 50 new-builds, which will increase our total domestic land fleet by more than 50 percent. Over 70 percent of our U.S. land fleet
will then be comprised of these 100 FlexRigs. That distinctive fleet
®FlexRig is a registered trademark of Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
2
profile allows us to present our customers an across the
board quality offering and fleet uniformity that I believe is unmatched in the land drilling industry.
U.S. Land Operations
Compared to last year, the Company had approximately ten
additional rigs working for a full year in 2005, as average utilization increased from 87 to 94 percent in our U.S. land operations segment. At the
close of 2005, the segment had only one uncommitted rig, and its fleet was 97 percent utilized. Revenue and operating income increased by 52 percent
and 363 percent, respectively, over the prior year. Dayrates increased substantially in 2005, and theyve continued to escalate during the first
quarter of 2006.
The Companys 32 FlexRig3s consistently lead the industry in
field performance and strong pricing. The Company also announced 50 additional new-build orders, each with a three or four-year term contract. These
new rigs represent a 100 percent expansion of our existing FlexRig fleet and a 56 percent expansion of our U.S. land rig fleet. Prices for drilling
machinery are increasing drastically, and the Company is fortunate to have 50 FlexRigs in the field today and a timely start on the next 50. Managing
our assembly operation allows us to better control total cost, delivery schedule, and field performance. We plan to deliver the first new FlexRig in
December and to continue delivering FlexRigs at a rate of two per month. Our plans are to increase the production rate to three FlexRigs per month in
the spring and to four FlexRigs per month in the summer of 2006.
3
U.S. Offshore Operations
Despite a slowdown in recent years, the Gulf of Mexico remains a
critical North American producing basin. Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, and a year before them, Ivan, caused significant damage to the oil and gas
infrastructure in the Gulf, and this has caused considerable uncertainty in commodity markets and with future investment plans. The Company had five
rigs active on customers offshore platforms at the close of fiscal 2005, including H&P Rig 201, which was significantly damaged by Hurricane
Katrina. We do not anticipate that Rig 201 will return to service during 2006.
Revenue increased only slightly in 2005, as rig activity was
essentially unchanged from 2004. Operating income was $17.7 million in 2005, compared with a loss in 2004, which was due primarily to an asset
impairment charge. Three rigs were mobilized in the last quarter of 2005 and have commenced drilling operations during the first quarter of
2006. Another rig is committed and is expected to start drilling operations during the second fiscal quarter of 2006. The two remaining rigs have been
bid-on projects that could begin operations by the fourth quarter of 2006.
International Operations
At the close of the year, the Company had 12 rigs in Venezuela,
eight in Ecuador, and two each in Argentina, Bolivia, and Colombia. The Company also has a management contract for a platform rig offshore Equatorial
Guinea, West Africa. Approximately 21 land rigs worked the full year, compared with 17 rigs in 2004. Accordingly, international revenue and operating
income increased 19 percent and 56 percent, respectively, for the year. Ecuador and Venezuela continue to be the
4
most active markets and Colombia and Argentina experienced
some encouraging growth in 2005 as well. Two idle rigs will begin working in Chile and Argentina during the first quarter of 2006, and two more rigs
will commence operations in Venezuela and Argentina during the second quarter. In addition to South America, the Company continues to pursue other
international opportunities.
Summary
The progress made in 2005 is a credit to the inspiration,
dedication, and hard work of our employees. I want to thank all of our people for their effort and also express appreciation to George Dotson, who will
retire March 1, 2006, for over 35 years of invaluable service and leadership to the Company.
Hans Helmerich
President
December 7, 2005
5
Financial & Operating Review
Years
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
SUMMARY OF CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Revenues
|
|
|
|
$
|
800,726
|
|
|
$
|
589,056
|
|
|
$
|
504,223
|
|
Operating
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
484,231
|
|
|
|
417,716
|
|
|
|
346,259
|
|
Depreciation**
|
|
|
|
|
96,274
|
|
|
|
145,941
|
|
|
|
82,513
|
|
General and
Administrative Expense
|
|
|
|
|
41,015
|
|
|
|
37,661
|
|
|
|
41,003
|
|
Operating
Income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
179,206
|
|
|
|
(12,262
|
)
|
|
|
34,448
|
|
Interest,
Dividend, and Other Income
|
|
|
|
|
5,574
|
|
|
|
2,162
|
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
Income from
Investment and Asset Sales
|
|
|
|
|
40,519
|
|
|
|
30,795
|
|
|
|
9,218
|
|
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
12,642
|
|
|
|
12,695
|
|
|
|
12,289
|
|
Income from
Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
127,606
|
|
|
|
4,359
|
|
|
|
17,873
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
|
|
127,606
|
|
|
|
4,359
|
|
|
|
17,873
|
|
Diluted
Earnings Per Common Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from
Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
.09
|
|
|
|
.35
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
|
|
2.45
|
|
|
|
.09
|
|
|
|
.35
|
|
*$000s
omitted, except per share data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
data excludes discontinued operations except net income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**2004 includes an asset impairment of $51,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUMMARY FINANCIAL DATA*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash**
|
|
|
|
$
|
288,752
|
|
|
$
|
65,296
|
|
|
$
|
38,189
|
|
Working
Capital**
|
|
|
|
|
410,316
|
|
|
|
185,427
|
|
|
|
110,848
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
|
|
178,452
|
|
|
|
161,532
|
|
|
|
158,770
|
|
Property,
Plant, and Equipment, Net**
|
|
|
|
|
981,965
|
|
|
|
998,674
|
|
|
|
1,058,205
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
1,663,350
|
|
|
|
1,406,844
|
|
|
|
1,417,770
|
|
Long-term
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
1,079,238
|
|
|
|
914,110
|
|
|
|
917,251
|
|
Capital
Expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
86,805
|
|
|
|
90,212
|
|
|
|
242,912
|
|
*$000s
omitted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Excludes discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RIG
FLEET SUMMARY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling Rigs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. Land
FlexRigs
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
U. S. Land
Highly Mobile
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
U. S. Land
Conventional
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
U. S.
Offshore Platform
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
Total Rig
Fleet
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
Rig
Utilization Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U. S. Land
FlexRigs
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
U. S. Land
Highly Mobile
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
U. S. Land
Conventional
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
U. S. Land
All Rigs
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
U. S.
Offshore Platform
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
6
2002
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
2000
|
|
1999
|
|
1998
|
|
1997
|
|
1996
|
|
1995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$523,418
|
|
|
|
$
|
528,187
|
|
|
$
|
383,898
|
|
|
$
|
430,475
|
|
|
$
|
476,750
|
|
|
$
|
351,710
|
|
|
$
|
275,096
|
|
|
$
|
227,646
|
|
362,133
|
|
|
|
|
331,063
|
|
|
|
249,318
|
|
|
|
288,969
|
|
|
|
321,798
|
|
|
|
227,921
|
|
|
|
185,210
|
|
|
|
159,073
|
|
61,447
|
|
|
|
|
49,532
|
|
|
|
77,317
|
|
|
|
70,092
|
|
|
|
58,187
|
|
|
|
48,291
|
|
|
|
39,592
|
|
|
|
37,364
|
|
36,563
|
|
|
|
|
28,180
|
|
|
|
23,306
|
|
|
|
24,629
|
|
|
|
21,299
|
|
|
|
15,636
|
|
|
|
15,222
|
|
|
|
14,019
|
|
63,275
|
|
|
|
|
119,412
|
|
|
|
33,957
|
|
|
|
46,785
|
|
|
|
75,466
|
|
|
|
59,862
|
|
|
|
35,072
|
|
|
|
17,190
|
|
2,713
|
|
|
|
|
9,876
|
|
|
|
19,540
|
|
|
|
2,823
|
|
|
|
5,899
|
|
|
|
5,779
|
|
|
|
5,381
|
|
|
|
6,455
|
|
26,212
|
|
|
|
|
5,390
|
|
|
|
14,164
|
|
|
|
4,786
|
|
|
|
41,032
|
|
|
|
6,575
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
6,752
|
|
980
|
|
|
|
|
1,701
|
|
|
|
2,730
|
|
|
|
5,389
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
407
|
|
53,706
|
|
|
|
|
80,467
|
|
|
|
36,470
|
|
|
|
32,115
|
|
|
|
80,790
|
|
|
|
48,801
|
|
|
|
25,844
|
|
|
|
18,464
|
|
63,517
|
|
|
|
|
144,254
|
|
|
|
82,300
|
|
|
|
42,788
|
|
|
|
101,154
|
|
|
|
84,186
|
|
|
|
72,566
|
|
|
|
9,751
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
|
|
|
.73
|
|
|
|
.65
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
|
|
.97
|
|
|
|
.52
|
|
|
|
.38
|
|
1.26
|
|
|
|
|
2.84
|
|
|
|
1.64
|
|
|
|
.86
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
1.67
|
|
|
|
1.46
|
|
|
|
.20
|
|
|
|
|
|
$46,883
|
|
|
|
$
|
128,826
|
|
|
$
|
107,632
|
|
|
$
|
21,758
|
|
|
$
|
24,476
|
|
|
$
|
27,963
|
|
|
$
|
16,892
|
|
|
$
|
19,543
|
|
105,852
|
|
|
|
|
223,980
|
|
|
|
179,884
|
|
|
|
82,893
|
|
|
|
49,179
|
|
|
|
65,802
|
|
|
|
48,128
|
|
|
|
50,038
|
|
150,175
|
|
|
|
|
203,271
|
|
|
|
307,425
|
|
|
|
240,891
|
|
|
|
200,400
|
|
|
|
323,510
|
|
|
|
229,809
|
|
|
|
156,908
|
|
897,445
|
|
|
|
|
650,051
|
|
|
|
526,723
|
|
|
|
553,769
|
|
|
|
548,555
|
|
|
|
392,489
|
|
|
|
329,377
|
|
|
|
286,678
|
|
1,227,313
|
|
|
|
|
1,300,121
|
|
|
|
1,200,854
|
|
|
|
1,073,465
|
|
|
|
1,053,200
|
|
|
|
987,432
|
|
|
|
786,351
|
|
|
|
707,061
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
895,170
|
|
|
|
|
1,026,477
|
|
|
|
955,703
|
|
|
|
848,109
|
|
|
|
793,148
|
|
|
|
780,580
|
|
|
|
645,970
|
|
|
|
562,435
|
|
312,064
|
|
|
|
|
184,668
|
|
|
|
65,820
|
|
|
|
78,357
|
|
|
|
217,597
|
|
|
|
114,626
|
|
|
|
83,411
|
|
|
|
89,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
35
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
7
Managements Discussion & Analysis of
Results of
Operations and Financial Condition
RISK FACTORS AND FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere herein. The Companys future operating results may be affected by various
trends and factors, which are beyond the Companys control. These include, among other factors, fluctuations in oil and natural gas prices,
expiration or termination of drilling contracts, currency exchange gains and losses, changes in general economic conditions, rapid or unexpected
changes in technologies, risks of foreign operations, uninsured risks, and uncertain business conditions that affect the Companys businesses.
Accordingly, past results and trends should not be used by investors to anticipate future results or trends.
With the exception of historical information, the matters
discussed in Managements Discussion & Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition include forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are based on various assumptions. The Company cautions that, while it believes such assumptions to be reasonable and makes
them in good faith, assumed facts almost always vary from actual results. The differences between assumed facts and actual results can be material. The
Company is including this cautionary statement to take advantage of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995 for any forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company. The factors identified in this cautionary statement and those
factors discussed under Risk Factors beginning on page 7 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K are important factors (but not necessarily all important
factors) that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by, or on behalf of, the
Company. The Company undertakes no
8
duty to update or revise its forward-looking statements based on changes of
internal estimates or expectations or otherwise.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. is primarily a contract drilling
company which owned and operated a total of 128 drilling rigs at September 30, 2005. The Companys contract drilling business includes the U.S.
land rig business in which the Company owned 91 rigs, the U.S. offshore platform rig business in which the Company owned 11 offshore platform rigs, and
the international land rig business in which the Company owned 26 rigs at year end. Crude oil and natural gas prices have continued to rise due to the
uncertainty of both commodities. The recent hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico contributed to the instability of these markets because of a concern of a
possible shortage of deliverable natural gas to meet the prospective total demand in the U.S. Because of these dynamics, the overall demand for
drilling rig services has increased in all segments.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
All per share amounts included in the Results of Operations
discussion are stated on a diluted basis. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.s net income for 2005 was $127.6 million ($2.45 per share), compared with
$4.4 million ($0.09 per share) for 2004 and $17.9 million ($0.35 per share) for 2003. Included in 2004 net income was a pre-tax asset impairment charge
(discussed in detail later) of $51.5 million ($31.9 million after-tax or $0.63 per share). Included in the Companys net income, but not related
to its operations, were after-tax gains from the sale of investment securities of $16.4 million ($0.32 per share) in 2005, $14.1 million ($0.28 per
share) in 2004, and $3.3 million ($0.07 per share) in 2003. In addition to income from security sales, the Company
9
recorded net income during 2004 of $1.5 million ($0.03 per
share) from non-monetary investment gains. Also included in net income is the Companys portion of income or loss from its equity affiliates,
Atwood Oceanics, Inc. and a 50-50 joint venture with Atwood called Atwood Oceanics West Tuna Pty. Ltd. (dissolved in 2003). From equity affiliates, the
Company recorded net income of $0.05 per share in 2005, $0.01 per share in 2004 and a loss of $0.03 per share in 2003. (See Liquidity section of
MD&A for discussion of the sale of a portion of the Companys Atwood Oceanic stock in October 2004.)
Consolidated operating revenues were $800.7 million in 2005,
$589.1 million in 2004, and $504.2 million in 2003. Over the three-year period, U.S. land revenues increased due to the addition of FlexRigs combined
with significant increases in dayrates. The average number of U.S. land rigs available was 90 rigs in 2005, 86 rigs in 2004 and 76 rigs in 2003. U.S.
land rig utilizations for the Company were 94 percent in 2005, 87 percent in 2004 and 81 percent in 2003. Revenue in the offshore platform business
remained steady in 2005 from 2004 after a decline in 2003. International rig revenues increased from 2003 to 2005, as rig utilizations improved from 39
percent in 2003, 54 percent in 2004 and 77 percent in 2005.
Gains from the sale of investment securities were $27.0 million
in 2005, $25.4 million in 2004, and $5.5 million in 2003. Interest and dividend income fell from $2.5 million in 2003 to $2.0 million in 2004 due to
reduced cash positions, lower interest rates, and a reduction in the Companys equity portfolio. In 2005, interest and dividend income increased
to $5.8 million due to increased cash positions generated from the sale of equity securities, the sale of two U.S. land rigs and increased cash
flow.
10
Direct operating costs in 2005 were $484.2 million or 60 percent
of operating revenues, compared with $417.7 million or 71 percent of operating revenues in 2004, and $346.3 million or 69 percent of operating revenues
in 2003. The 2005 expense to revenue percentage decreased from 2004 and 2003 due to higher U.S. land revenue per day.
Depreciation expense was $96.3 million in 2005, $94.4 million in
2004 and $82.5 million in 2003. Depreciation expense increased over the three-year period as the Company placed into service 13 new rigs in 2002, 19
new rigs in 2003, and 5 new rigs in 2004. The Company anticipates 2006 depreciation expense to increase from 2005 as the rigs currently under
construction are placed into service. (See Liquidity and Capital Resources.)
Yearly, management performs an analysis of the general industry
market conditions in each drilling segment. Based on this analysis, management determines if an impairment is required. In 2005 and 2003, no impairment
was recorded. In 2004, management determined that the carrying value of certain offshore rigs exceeded the estimated undiscounted future cash flows
associated with these assets. Accordingly, a pre-tax asset impairment charge of $51.5 million was recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 to
reduce the carrying value of the assets to their estimated fair value. The fair value of drilling rigs is determined based on quoted market prices, if
available. Otherwise it is determined based upon estimated discounted future cash flows and rig utilization. Cash flows are estimated by management
considering factors such as prospective market demand, recent changes in rig technology and its effect on each rigs marketability, any cash
investment required to make a rig marketable, suitability of rig size
11
and makeup to existing platforms, and new competitive
dynamics due to lower industry utilization.
General and administrative expenses totaled $41.0 million in
2005, $37.7 million in 2004, and $41.0 million for 2003. The increase from 2004 to 2005 was the result of increases in employee benefits relating to
medical insurance and 401(k) matching expenses, professional services associated with Sarbanes-Oxley and employee salaries and bonuses. The decrease in
total general and administrative expenses from 2003 to 2004 was primarily from a reduction in pension expense due to a decrease in the benefit accrual,
reduced field training expense as the FlexRig training program was completed, and lower salary and bonus expense. These reductions were partially
offset by increases in property, casualty and health insurance expenses.
Interest expense was $12.6 million in 2005, $12.7 million in 2004
and $12.3 million in 2003. The interest expense in each year is primarily attributable to the $200 million of intermediate debt outstanding. Included
in 2004 and 2003 is interest for short-term borrowings. Capitalized interest was $.3 million, $.5 million and $1.8 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.
The provision for income taxes totaled $87.5 million in 2005,
$4.4 million in 2004, and $14.6 million in 2003. Effective income tax rates were 41 percent in 2005, 55 percent in 2004, and 43 percent in 2003.
Effective income tax rates are higher for the Companys international operations than for its U.S. operations. As a result, the aggregate
effective rate is higher in years when international operations make up a higher percentage of financial operating income. International operating
income, as a percent of the Companys total
12
operating income, was 11 percent in 2005, 31 percent in 2004
(excluding the asset impairment charge from total operating income), and 14 percent in 2003. (See Note 4 of the Financial Statements for additional
income tax disclosures.)
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND
2004
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
% Change
|
U.S. LAND OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except operating
statistics)
|
|
Operating
revenues
|
|
|
|
$
|
527,637
|
|
|
$
|
346,015
|
|
|
|
52.5
|
%
|
Direct operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
294,164
|
|
|
|
246,177
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
General and
administrative expense
|
|
|
|
|
8,594
|
|
|
|
7,765
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
60,222
|
|
|
|
56,528
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
|
$
|
164,657
|
|
|
$
|
35,545
|
|
|
|
363.2
|
|
|
Operating
Statistics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity
days
|
|
|
|
|
30,968
|
|
|
|
27,472
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
Average rig
revenue per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,941
|
|
|
$
|
11,635
|
|
|
|
37.0
|
|
Average rig
expense per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,403
|
|
|
$
|
8,001
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
Average rig
margin per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,538
|
|
|
$
|
3,634
|
|
|
|
107.4
|
|
Number of owned
rigs at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
Rig
utilization
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
Operating
statistics for per day revenue, expense and margin do not include reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses.
The Companys U.S. land rig operating income increased to
$164.7 million in 2005 from $35.5 million in 2004. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company began to experience an improvement in revenue
and margin per day due to higher levels of U.S. land rig activity and higher dayrates. The improvement continued during 2005, as crude oil and natural
gas prices remained at historical high levels. Rig utilization increased to 94 percent in 2005 from 87 percent in 2004. The increase in utilization is
a result of higher rig activity. Average rig expense per day increased 5 percent as the energy industry experienced demands on both costs and labor.
The total number of rigs available at September 30, 2005 was 91 compared
13
to 87 rigs at September 30, 2004. The increase is due to six
rigs moving to U.S. land operations from the Companys international fleet during 2005 and the sale of two conventional rigs in November 2004.
Depreciation in 2005 increased 6.5 percent from 2004 due to the increase in available rigs.
During 2005 and subsequent to September 30, 2005, the Company
announced plans to build 50 new FlexRigs. All of the new rigs will be operated by the Company under minimum fixed contract term agreements with at
least a three-year term. The drilling services will be performed on a daywork contract basis. The first new FlexRig will be delivered to the field in
December 2005, and thereafter at a rate of two per month, with delivery expected to increase to four per month by the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006. As
a result of the new FlexRigs, the Company anticipates depreciation expense to increase in fiscal 2006.
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND
2004
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
% Change
|
U.S. OFFSHORE
OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except operating
statistics)
|
|
Operating
revenues
|
|
|
|
$
|
84,921
|
|
|
$
|
84,238
|
|
|
|
.8
|
%
|
Direct operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
52,786
|
|
|
|
52,987
|
|
|
|
(.4
|
)
|
General and
administrative expense
|
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
10,602
|
|
|
|
12,107
|
|
|
|
(12.4
|
)
|
Asset impairment
charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
(loss)
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,708
|
|
|
$
|
(35,628
|
)
|
|
|
149.7
|
|
|
Operating
Statistics:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity
days
|
|
|
|
|
2,122
|
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
|
1.6
|
%
|
Average rig
revenue per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,228
|
|
|
$
|
29,070
|
|
|
|
.5
|
|
Average rig
expense per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,967
|
|
|
$
|
16,509
|
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
Average rig
margin per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,261
|
|
|
$
|
12,561
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Number of owned
rigs at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rig
utilization
|
|
|
|
|
53
|
%
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Operating statistics of per day
revenue, expense and margin do not include reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses and exclude the effects of offshore platform management
contracts.
14
Operating income in the Companys U.S. offshore platform rig
operations increased from a loss of $35.6 million in 2004, to income of $17.7 million in 2005. The loss in 2004 was due primarily to the asset
impairment charge of $51.5 million. Excluding the asset impairment charge, operating income would have been $15.9 million for 2004. Lower depreciation
expense in 2005 was a result of the asset impairment.
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
Operating income
(loss), as reported
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
(35.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Asset impairment
charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
income, excluding asset impairment charge
|
|
|
|
$
|
17.7
|
|
|
|
15.9
|
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
Note: This table is a
reconciliation of operating income (loss) for the offshore platform segment for fiscal 2005 and 2004, which is provided to assist with yearly
comparisons.
Operating income in the Companys U.S. offshore operations,
excluding the asset impairment charge in fiscal 2004, increased 11.5 percent in 2005 from 2004. On September 30, 2004, one of the Companys older
rigs was written down to its salvage value and removed from the active rig count. As a result, rig utilization increased to 53 percent in 2005, from 48
percent in 2004. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the Companys Rig 201 was damaged by Hurricane Katrina. Fiscal 2005 operating income
was negatively impacted by approximately $.6 million due to the rig being removed from service during the fourth quarter. The Company does not
anticipate Rig 201 returning to work during fiscal 2006. The rig was insured at a value that approximated replacement cost and therefore the Company
expects to record a gain resulting from the receipt of insurance proceeds. Because the damage assessment has not been completed, the Company is unable
to estimate the amount or timing of the gain.
15
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND
2004
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
% Change
|
INTERNATIONAL
OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except operating
statistics)
|
|
Operating
revenues
|
|
|
|
$
|
177,480
|
|
|
$
|
148,788
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
%
|
Direct operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
135,837
|
|
|
|
113,988
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
General and
administrative expense
|
|
|
|
|
2,563
|
|
|
|
2,144
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
20,107
|
|
|
|
20,530
|
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,973
|
|
|
$
|
12,126
|
|
|
|
56.5
|
|
|
Operating Statistics:
|
Activity
days
|
|
|
|
|
7,491
|
|
|
|
6,266
|
|
|
|
19.5
|
%
|
Average rig
revenue per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,332
|
|
|
$
|
19,580
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)
|
Average rig
expense per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,039
|
|
|
$
|
14,279
|
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
Average rig
margin per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,293
|
|
|
$
|
5,301
|
|
|
|
(.2
|
)
|
Number of owned
rigs at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
(18.8
|
)
|
Rig
utilization
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
%
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
42.6
|
|
Operating
statistics of per day revenue, expense and margin do not include reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses and exclude the effects of
management contracts and currency revaluation expense.
Operating income for the Companys international operations
increased 56.5 percent from 2004 to 2005 due to higher rig activity. Rig utilization for international operations averaged 77 percent in 2005, compared
with 54 percent in 2004. Operations in Colombia and Ecuador improved due to increased demand in these countries. Two deep rigs worked in Colombia at 87
percent activity during 2005, compared to 13 percent activity during the previous year. Ecuadors rig utilization was 97 percent for 2005, with an
average of 7.8 rigs worked during 2005, compared with 74 percent and an average of 5.9 rigs worked in 2004. Despite the increase in operating income
and rig activity, rig margins for international operations decreased slightly in 2005. The decrease is attributable to higher labor costs, including a
fourth quarter expense due to the Company not having an adequate reserve for government stipulated deferred compensation payments to Venezuela rig
employees.
16
In Venezuela, the Company had nine deep rigs working for PDVSA at
the end of fiscal 2005. One additional rig is under contract and will begin operations in the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Two rigs remain idle in
Venezuela. Ecuador and Colombia remain at 100% rig utilization. Argentina currently has two rigs working and a third rig is relocating to Northern
Argentina from the U.S. land operations and is expected to begin work during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Chile began operations in the first
quarter of fiscal 2006. Bolivia has one rig contracted and is expected to begin work during the second quarter of fiscal 2006. Operations in Hungary
ceased in 2005.
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 AND
2004
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
% Change
|
REAL ESTATE
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Operating
revenues
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,688
|
|
|
$
|
10,015
|
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
Direct operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
3,622
|
|
|
|
4,564
|
|
|
|
(20.6
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
2,352
|
|
|
|
2,253
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,714
|
|
|
$
|
3,198
|
|
|
|
47.4
|
|
Operating income in the Companys Real Estate division
increased 47.4 percent from 2004 to 2005. Direct operating expenses decreased in 2005 from 2004 due to reduced building expenses and lower demolition
costs relating to the razing of the Companys former headquarters building, which started in 2004, and was completed in 2005.
17
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 AND
2003
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
% Change
|
U.S. LAND OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except operating
statistics)
|
|
Operating
revenues
|
|
|
|
$
|
346,015
|
|
|
$
|
273,179
|
|
|
|
26.7
|
%
|
Direct operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
246,177
|
|
|
|
201,398
|
|
|
|
22.2
|
|
General and
administrative expense
|
|
|
|
|
7,765
|
|
|
|
9,304
|
|
|
|
(16.5
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
56,528
|
|
|
|
44,726
|
|
|
|
26.4
|
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,545
|
|
|
$
|
17,751
|
|
|
|
100.2
|
|
|
Operating Statistics:
|
Activity
days
|
|
|
|
|
27,472
|
|
|
|
22,588
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
%
|
Average rig
revenue per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,635
|
|
|
$
|
11,400
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Average rig
expense per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,001
|
|
|
$
|
8,222
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
Average rig
margin per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,634
|
|
|
$
|
3,178
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
|
Number of owned
rigs at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
Rig
utilization
|
|
|
|
|
87
|
%
|
|
|
81
|
%
|
|
|
7.4
|
|
Operating
statistics for per day revenue, expense and margin do not include reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses.
The Companys operating income in its U.S. land rig
operations increased by 100.2 percent from 2003 to 2004. This increase was due to improved rig utilization experienced by the Company, the increased
number of rigs available during 2004, and the improvement in average rig margin per day during the year. The improved margins were a result of slightly
increased average dayrates and lower expenses per rig day experienced during 2004. The lower expense per day in 2004 was due to the elimination of
excess crew overages that occurred in 2003 in connection with placing 19 new rigs into service. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the Company
began to experience a more significant improvement in revenue and margin per day due to higher levels of U.S. land rig activity. The total number of
rigs owned at the end of 2004 as compared to 2003 increased by a net of four rigs, resulting from five additional FlexRigs being completed during the
year and removing from service one older conventional rig. As a result of the new rigs put in service, and a full year of depreciation of rigs
put
18
in service during 2003, total U.S. land rig depreciation
increased 26.4 percent from 2003 to 2004.
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 AND
2003
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
% Change
|
U.S. OFFSHORE
OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except operating
statistics)
|
|
Operating
revenues
|
|
|
|
$
|
84,238
|
|
|
$
|
112,259
|
|
|
|
(25.0
|
)%
|
Direct operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
52,987
|
|
|
|
60,589
|
|
|
|
(12.5
|
)
|
General and
administrative expense
|
|
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
|
|
2,939
|
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
12,107
|
|
|
|
12,799
|
|
|
|
(5.4
|
)
|
Asset impairment
charge
|
|
|
|
|
51,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
(loss)
|
|
|
|
$
|
(35,628
|
)
|
|
$
|
35,932
|
|
|
|
(199.2
|
)
|
|
Operating Statistics:
|
Activity
days
|
|
|
|
|
2,088
|
|
|
|
2,233
|
|
|
|
(6.5
|
)
|
Average rig
revenue per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,070
|
|
|
$
|
38,076
|
|
|
|
(23.7
|
)
|
Average rig
expense per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
16,509
|
|
|
$
|
17,823
|
|
|
|
(7.4
|
)
|
Average rig
margin per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,561
|
|
|
$
|
20,253
|
|
|
|
(38.0
|
)
|
Number of owned
rigs at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(8.3
|
)
|
Rig
utilization
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
|
|
(5.9
|
)
|
Operating
statistics of per day revenue, expense and margin do not include reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses and exclude the effects of
offshore platform management contracts.
Operating income in the Companys U.S. offshore platform rig
operations fell from $35.9 million during 2003 to a loss of $35.6 million in 2004 due primarily to the asset impairment charge of $51.5 million.
Excluding the asset impairment charge, operating income would have been $15.9 million for 2004 which is a $20.0 million decline from
2003.
Financial performance during 2004 was hindered by continued
softness in the offshore platform rig market which kept rig utilizations at an average of 48 percent for 2004. More importantly, total operating
revenues and revenue per day declined due to changes in the nature of contract terms on several of the Companys rigs. During
2003,
19
contracts for two of the Companys newest rigs
terminated and were renegotiated at lower dayrates just prior to the end of the year. Additionally, two other rigs that were working at full dayrates
during fiscal 2003 were changed to standby status, thereby reducing total operating revenues and profitability. These specific transactions, coupled
with an overall softening in the market, caused average rig revenue and margin per day to decline during 2004.
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 AND
2003
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
% Change
|
INTERNATIONAL
OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except operating
statistics)
|
|
Operating
revenues
|
|
|
|
$
|
148,788
|
|
|
$
|
109,517
|
|
|
|
35.9
|
%
|
Direct operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
113,988
|
|
|
|
81,461
|
|
|
|
39.9
|
|
General and
administrative expense
|
|
|
|
|
2,144
|
|
|
|
3,110
|
|
|
|
(31.1
|
)
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
20,530
|
|
|
|
20,092
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,126
|
|
|
$
|
4,854
|
|
|
|
149.8
|
|
|
Operating Statistics:
|
Activity
days
|
|
|
|
|
6,266
|
|
|
|
4,515
|
|
|
|
38.8
|
%
|
Average rig
revenue per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
19,580
|
|
|
$
|
19,538
|
|
|
|
.2
|
|
Average rig
expense per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,279
|
|
|
$
|
14,140
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Average rig
margin per day
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,301
|
|
|
$
|
5,398
|
|
|
|
(1.8
|
)
|
Number of owned
rigs at end of period
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rig
utilization
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
38.5
|
|
Operating
statistics of per day revenue, expense and margin do not include reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses, the effects of management
contracts, or the effect of currency revaluation expense.
Operating income for the Companys international operations
increased 149.8 percent from 2003 to 2004 due to higher rig activity and lower general and administrative expense resulting from reduced salary, bonus
and travel expense. Rig activity improved primarily due to increased demand in the Companys largest international operation in Venezuela.
Venezuelan operations improved substantially as the government-owned oil company, PDVSA, increased their spending in an attempt to
20
improve overall production rates following the reduction in
production caused by workers strike and attempted coup in Venezuela during 2003. Despite overall improvement of conditions in Venezuela, the
currency there was devalued during the year, resulting in a loss of $1.9 million for 2004. (See MD&A Section on Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
for more discussion.)
COMPARISON OF THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 AND
2003
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
% Change
|
REAL ESTATE
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Operating
revenues
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,015
|
|
|
$
|
9,268
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
Direct operating
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
4,564
|
|
|
|
2,811
|
|
|
|
62.4
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
2,253
|
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
|
|
(11.1
|
)
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,198
|
|
|
$
|
3,922
|
|
|
|
(18.5
|
)
|
Operating income decreased by 18.5 percent from 2003 to 2004 in
the Companys Real Estate division. Direct operating expenses increased in 2004 due to demolition costs of over $.8 million relating to the razing
of the Companys former headquarters building and an increase in advertising expense. Depreciation in 2003 was higher than 2004 due to the
acceleration of depreciation on the razed building.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Companys capital spending for operations was $86.8
million in 2005, $90.2 million in 2004, and $242.9 million in 2003. Net cash provided from operating activities for those same time periods was $212.2
million in 2005, $136.6 million in 2004 and $93.1 million in 2003. In addition to the net cash provided by operating activities, the Company also
generated net proceeds from the sale of portfolio securities of $46.7 million in 2005, $30.9 million in 2004, and $18.2 million in 2003. The
Companys 2006 capital spending
21
estimate is approximately $500 million, an increase from the
budgeted $95 million in 2005, due to the construction of new FlexRigs.
During 2003, 19 rigs from the FlexRig3 program were completed and
another five were completed by March, 2004. During 2005 and subsequent to September 30, 2005, the Company announced contracts to operate eight new
FlexRig3s and 42 new FlexRig4s for 12 exploration and production companies. The first rig is scheduled for completion in December 2005, with the
remaining rigs expected to be delivered at a rate of two per month, with delivery expected to increase to four per month by the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2006. Projected rig construction is expected to average approximately $11.0 million to $14.0 million per rig depending on equipment
requirements. Each agreement has at least a three-year commitment by the operator under a minimum fixed contract. The drilling services will be
performed on a daywork contract basis.
Current cash, investments in short-term money market securities,
and projected cash generated from operating activities are anticipated to meet the Companys current estimated capital expenditures and other
expected cash requirements for fiscal 2006.
The Company has $200 million intermediate-term unsecured debt
obligations with staged maturities from August, 2007 to August, 2014. The annual average interest rate through maturity will be 6.43 percent.
The terms of the debt obligations require the Company to maintain a minimum ratio of debt to total capitalization.
On September 30, 2005, the Company had a committed unsecured line
of credit totaling $50 million, with no money drawn and letters
22
of credit totaling $14 million outstanding against the line.
The line of credit matures in 2006 and bears interest of LIBOR plus .875 percent to 1.125 percent or prime minus 1.75 percent to prime minus 1.50
percent depending on certain financial ratios of the Company. The Company must maintain certain financial ratios including debt to total capitalization
and debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, and a certain level of tangible net worth.
Current ratios for September 30, 2005 and 2004 were 5.6 and 4.1,
respectively. The debt to total capitalization ratio was 16 percent and 18 percent at September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Additionally, the
Company manages a portfolio of marketable securities that, at the close of 2005, had a market value of $293.4 million. The Companys investments
in Atwood Oceanics, Inc., and Schlumberger, Ltd., made up almost 93 percent of the portfolios market value on September 30, 2005. The value of
the portfolio is subject to fluctuation in the market and may vary considerably over time. Excluding the Companys equity-method investments, the
portfolio is recorded at fair value on the Companys balance sheet for each reporting period. In July 2004, Atwood Oceanics, Inc., (Atwood) the
Companys equity affiliate, filed a Registration Statement covering all 3,000,000 shares of Atwood stock owned by Helmerich & Payne. On
October 19, 2004, Atwood and Helmerich & Payne closed a public offering in which Helmerich & Payne sold 1,000,000 Atwood shares and received
$45.6 million. The Company now owns 2,000,000 shares or approximately 13.0 percent of the outstanding shares of Atwood.
23
During 2005, the Company paid a dividend of $0.33 per share, or a
total of $16.9 million, representing the 33
rd
consecutive year of dividend
increases.
STOCK PORTFOLIO HELD BY THE COMPANY
September
30, 2005
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
Cost Basis
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share
amounts)
|
|
Atwood Oceanics,
Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
46,533
|
|
|
$
|
168,420
|
|
Schlumberger,
Ltd.
|
|
|
|
|
1,230,000
|
|
|
|
19,539
|
|
|
|
103,787
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,398
|
|
|
|
21,150
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
77,470
|
|
|
$
|
293,357
|
|
MATERIAL COMMITMENTS
The Company has no off balance sheet arrangements other than
operating leases. The Companys contractual obligations as of September 30, 2005, are summarized in the table below:
Payments
Due By Year
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
After 2010
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Long-term debt
(a)
|
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
Operating leases
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
9,231
|
|
|
|
3,095
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
$
|
209,231
|
|
|
$
|
3,095
|
|
|
$
|
27,470
|
|
|
$
|
1,615
|
|
|
$
|
26,569
|
|
|
$
|
482
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
(a)
|
|
See Note 3 Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt to
the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
(b)
|
|
See Note 13 Contingent Liabilities and
Commitments to the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
The above table does not include obligations for the
Companys pension plan, for which the recorded liability at September 30, 2005 is $27.1 million. Based on current information available from plan
actuaries, the Company anticipates contributions of approximately $2.8 million will be made in 2006. Future contributions beyond 2006 are difficult to
estimate due to multiple variables involved.
24
At September 30, 2005, the Company had commitments outstanding of
approximately $96.2 million for the purchase of contract drilling equipment.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND
ESTIMATES
The Companys consolidated financial statements are impacted
by the accounting policies used and the estimates and assumptions made by management during their preparation. On an on-going basis, the Company
evaluates the estimates, including those related to inventories, long-lived assets, and accrued insurance losses. The estimates are based on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for
making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from
these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The following is a discussion of the critical accounting policies, which relate to property,
plant and equipment, impairment of long-lived assets, self-insurance accruals, and revenue recognition. Other significant accounting policies are
summarized in Note 1 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
Property, plant and equipment, including renewals and
betterments, are stated at cost, while maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Interest costs applicable to the construction of qualifying
assets are capitalized as a component of the cost of such assets. The Company provides for the depreciation of property, plant and equipment using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Upon retirement or other disposal of fixed assets, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from
25
the respective accounts and any gains or losses are recorded
in net income.
The Companys management assesses the potential impairment
of its long-lived assets whenever events or changes in conditions indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Changes that
trigger such an assessment may include equipment obsolescence, changes in the market demand for a specific asset, periods of relatively low rig
utilizations, declining revenue per day, declining cash margin per day, completion of specific contracts, and/or overall changes in general market
conditions. If a review of the long-lived assets indicates that the carrying value of certain of these assets is more than the estimated undiscounted
future cash flows, an impairment charge is made to adjust the carrying value to the estimated fair market value of the asset. See additional discussion
of impairment assumptions, including determination of fair value, under Results of Operations. Use of different assumptions could result in an
impairment charge different from that reported.
The Company is self-insured or maintains high deductibles for
certain losses relating to workers compensation, general, product, and auto liabilities. Generally, deductibles range from $1.0 million or $2.0
million per occurrence depending on whether a claim occurs inside or outside of the United States. Insurance is also purchased on rig properties and
generally deductibles are $1.0 million per occurrence. Excess insurance is purchased over these coverages to limit the Companys exposure to
catastrophic claims, but there can be no assurance that such coverage will respond or be adequate in all circumstances. Retained losses are estimated
and accrued based upon our estimates of the aggregate liability for claims incurred, and using
26
the Companys historical loss experience and estimation
methods that are believed to be reliable. Nonetheless, insurance estimates include certain assumptions and management judgments regarding the frequency
and severity of claims, claim development, and settlement practices. Unanticipated changes in these factors may produce materially different amounts of
expense that would be reported under these programs.
The Companys pension benefit costs and obligations are
dependent on various actuarial assumptions. The Company makes assumptions relating to discount rates, rate of compensation increase, and expected
return on plan assets. The Company bases its discount rate assumption on current yields on AA-rated corporate long-term bonds. The rate of compensation
increase assumption reflects actual experience and future outlook. The expected return on plan assets is determined based on historical portfolio
results and future expectations of rates of return. Actual results that differ from estimated assumptions are accumulated and amortized over the
estimated future working life of the plan participants and could therefore affect expense recognized and obligations in future
periods.
Revenues and costs on daywork contracts are recognized daily as
the work progresses. For certain contracts, lump-sum payments are received for the mobilization of rigs and other drilling equipment. Revenues earned,
net of direct costs incurred for the mobilization, are deferred and recognized over the term of the related drilling contract. Other lump-sum payments
received from customers relating to specific contracts are deferred and amortized to income as services are performed. Costs incurred to relocate rigs
and other drilling
27
equipment to areas in which a contract has not been secured
are expensed as incurred.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARD
In December, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. Statement 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and amends FASB
Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. The statement requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock
options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair value. The statement is effective at the beginning of the first interim or
annual period beginning after June 15, 2005, with the SEC allowing for implementation at the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after June
15, 2005. The Company plans to adopt the new standard the first quarter of fiscal 2006, beginning October 1, 2005, under the
modified-prospective-transition method. The Company will recognize compensation cost for share-based payments to employees based on their grant-date
fair value from the beginning of the fiscal period in which the recognition provisions are first applied. Measurement and attribution of compensation
cost for awards that were granted but not vested prior to the date the Company adopts the new standard will be based on the same estimate of the
grant-date fair value and the same attribution method used previously under Statement 123 for pro forma disclosure. For those awards that are granted,
modified or settled after the Company adopts the Statement, compensation cost will be measured and recognized in the financial statements in accordance
with the provision of Statement 123(R). The Company expects to
28
incur additional pre-tax compensation expense of
approximately $1.3 million related to options currently outstanding in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 as a result of adopting Statement 123(R).
Statement 123(R) also requires that the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow,
rather than an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net
financing cash flows in periods after the effective date. The Company cannot estimate what those amounts will be in the future because they depend on,
among other things, when employees exercise stock options.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk
The Company has
international operations in several South American countries, as well as a labor contract for work in Equatorial Guinea. With the exception of
Venezuela, the Companys exposure to currency valuation losses is usually minimal due to the fact that virtually all invoice billings and receipts
in other countries are in U.S. dollars.
The Company is exposed to risks of currency devaluation in
Venezuela primarily as a result of bolivar receivable balances and bolivar cash balances. In Venezuela, approximately 40 percent of the Companys
invoice billings to the Venezuelan state oil company, PDVSA, are in U.S. dollars and 60 percent are in the local currency, the bolivar. In compliance
with applicable regulations the Company on October 1, 2003, submitted a request to the Venezuelan government seeking permission to convert existing
bolivar balances into U.S. dollars. In January 2004, the Venezuelan government approved the conversion of bolivar cash balances to U.S. dollars and the
remittance of $8.8 million
29
U.S. dollars as dividends by the Companys Venezuelan
subsidiary to the U.S. based parent. As a consequence, the Companys exposure to currency devaluation was reduced by this amount.
As stated above, the Company is exposed to risks of currency
devaluation in Venezuela primarily as a result of bolivar receivable balances and bolivar cash balances. The exchange rate increased to 2150 bolivares
during 2005 from 1920 bolivares at September 30, 2004. As a result of the 12 percent devaluation of the bolivar during fiscal 2005 (from September 2004
through August 2005), the Company experienced total devaluation losses of $.6 million during that same period. This 12 percent devaluation loss may not
be reflective of the actual potential for future devaluation losses because of the exchange controls that are currently in place. While the Company is
unable to predict future devaluation in Venezuela, if fiscal 2006 activity levels are similar to fiscal 2005 and if a 10 percent to 20 percent
devaluation were to occur, the Company could experience potential currency devaluation losses ranging from approximately $1.6 million to $2.9
million.
In late August 2003, the Venezuelan state petroleum company
agreed, on a prospective basis, to pay a portion of the Companys dollar-based invoices in U.S. dollars. There is no guarantee as to how long this
arrangement will continue. Were this agreement to end, the Company would revert back to receiving payments in bolivares and thus increase bolivar cash
balances and exposure to devaluation.
On September 28, 2005, the Company made application with the
Venezuelan government requesting the approval to convert bolivar cash balances to U.S. dollars. Upon approval from the Venezuelan
30
government, the Companys Venezuelan subsidiary will
remit those dollars as a dividend to its U.S. based parent, thus reducing the Companys exposure to currency devaluation.
Commodity Price Risk
The demand for contract drilling
services is a result of exploration and production companies spending money to explore and develop drilling prospects in search for crude oil and
natural gas. Their appetite for such spending is driven by their cash flow and financial strength, which is very dependent on, among other things,
crude oil and natural gas commodity prices. Crude oil prices are determined by a number of factors including supply and demand, worldwide economic
conditions, and geopolitical factors. Crude oil and natural gas prices have been volatile and very difficult to predict. This difficulty has led many
exploration and production companies to base their capital spending on much more conservative estimates of commodity prices. As a result, demand for
contract drilling services is not always purely a function of the movement of commodity prices.
Interest Rate Risk
The Companys interest rate risk
exposure results primarily from short-term rates, mainly LIBOR-based on borrowings from its commercial banks. The Company currently maintains all of
its debt portfolio in fixed-rate debt. Due to the fact that all of the Companys debt at year-end has fixed rate interest obligations, there is no
current risk due to interest rate fluctuation.
The following tables provide information as of September 30, 2005
and 2004 about the Companys interest rate risk sensitive instruments:
31
INTEREST RATE RISK AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2005 (in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
After
2010
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair
Value
@ 9/30/05
|
Fixed
Rate Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
215,000
|
|
Average
Interest Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTEREST
RATE RISK AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
After
2009
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair Value
@ 9/30/04
|
Fixed Rate
Debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
216,400
|
|
Average Interest
Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
%
|
|
|
6.5
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Price Risk
On September 30, 2005, the Company owned
stocks in other publicly held companies with a total market value of $293.4 million. The Companys investments in Atwood Oceanics, Inc. and
Schlumberger, Ltd. made up almost 93 percent of the portfolios market value at September 30, 2005. Although the Company sold portions of its
positions in Schlumberger in 2004 and Atwood in the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the Company has no specific plans to sell additional securities, but
may sell additional securities based on market conditions and other circumstances. These securities are subject to a wide variety and number of
market-related risks that could substantially reduce or increase the market value of the Companys holdings. Except for the Companys
holdings in its equity affiliate, Atwood Oceanics, Inc., the portfolio is recorded at fair value on its balance sheet with changes in unrealized
after-tax value reflected in the equity section of its balance sheet. Any reduction in market value would have an impact on the Companys debt
ratio and financial strength. The total market value of the portfolio of securities was $240.7 million at September 30, 2004.
32
Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting
Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Helmerich &
Payne, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. as of September 30, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts
and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. at September 30, 2005 and 2004, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2005, in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of Helmerich & Payne Inc.s internal control over financial
reporting as of September 30, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated December 1, 2005 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Tulsa, Oklahoma
December 1, 2005
except for Note 15, as to which the date is
December 7, 2005
33
Consolidated Statements of Income
Years
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
OPERATING REVENUES
|
Drilling
U.S. Land
|
|
|
|
$
|
527,637
|
|
|
$
|
346,015
|
|
|
$
|
273,179
|
|
Drilling
U.S. Offshore
|
|
|
|
|
84,921
|
|
|
|
84,238
|
|
|
|
112,259
|
|
Drilling
International
|
|
|
|
|
177,480
|
|
|
|
148,788
|
|
|
|
109,517
|
|
Real
Estate
|
|
|
|
|
10,688
|
|
|
|
10,015
|
|
|
|
9,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800,726
|
|
|
|
589,056
|
|
|
|
504,223
|
|
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES
|
Operating
costs
|
|
|
|
|
484,231
|
|
|
|
417,716
|
|
|
|
346,259
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
96,274
|
|
|
|
94,425
|
|
|
|
82,513
|
|
Asset
impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and
administrative
|
|
|
|
|
41,015
|
|
|
|
37,661
|
|
|
|
41,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
621,520
|
|
|
|
601,318
|
|
|
|
469,775
|
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
179,206
|
|
|
|
(12,262
|
)
|
|
|
34,448
|
|
|
Other
income (expense)
|
Interest and
dividend income
|
|
|
|
|
5,809
|
|
|
|
1,965
|
|
|
|
2,467
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
|
|
(12,642
|
)
|
|
|
(12,695
|
)
|
|
|
(12,289
|
)
|
Gain on sale
of investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
26,969
|
|
|
|
25,418
|
|
|
|
5,529
|
|
Income from
asset sales
|
|
|
|
|
13,550
|
|
|
|
5,377
|
|
|
|
3,689
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,451
|
|
|
|
20,262
|
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
|
Income before
income taxes and equity in income (loss) of affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
212,657
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
33,942
|
|
Income tax
provision
|
|
|
|
|
87,463
|
|
|
|
4,365
|
|
|
|
14,649
|
|
Equity in income
(loss) of affiliates net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
2,412
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
(1,420
|
)
|
|
NET
INCOME
|
|
|
|
$
|
127,606
|
|
|
$
|
4,359
|
|
|
$
|
17,873
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
Average common
shares outstanding (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
51,087
|
|
|
|
50,312
|
|
|
|
50,039
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
52,033
|
|
|
|
50,833
|
|
|
|
50,596
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
statements.
34
Consolidated Balance Sheets
ASSETS
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
|
|
|
$
|
288,752
|
|
|
$
|
65,296
|
|
Accounts
receivable, less reserve of $1,791 in 2005 and $1,265 in 2004
|
|
|
|
|
162,646
|
|
|
|
133,262
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
21,313
|
|
|
|
20,826
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
8,765
|
|
|
|
4,346
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
|
|
|
|
18,321
|
|
|
|
21,600
|
|
Total current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
499,797
|
|
|
|
245,330
|
|
|
INVESTMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
178,452
|
|
|
|
161,532
|
|
|
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
drilling equipment
|
|
|
|
|
1,549,112
|
|
|
|
1,531,937
|
|
Construction
in progress
|
|
|
|
|
34,774
|
|
|
|
1,228
|
|
Real estate
properties
|
|
|
|
|
57,489
|
|
|
|
56,307
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
96,614
|
|
|
|
93,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,737,989
|
|
|
|
1,683,112
|
|
Less-Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
756,024
|
|
|
|
684,438
|
|
Net property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
981,965
|
|
|
|
998,674
|
|
|
OTHER
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
3,136
|
|
|
|
1,308
|
|
|
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,663,350
|
|
|
$
|
1,406,844
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
statements.
35
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,854
|
|
|
$
|
28,012
|
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
44,627
|
|
|
|
31,891
|
|
Total current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
89,481
|
|
|
|
59,903
|
|
|
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
Long-term
notes payable
|
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
246,975
|
|
|
|
194,573
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
47,656
|
|
|
|
38,258
|
|
Total
noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
494,631
|
|
|
|
432,831
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock,
$.10 par value, 80,000,000 shares authorized,
53,528,952 shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
5,353
|
|
|
|
5,353
|
|
Preferred
stock, no par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized,
no shares issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
|
|
112,297
|
|
|
|
85,466
|
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
|
|
939,380
|
|
|
|
828,763
|
|
Unearned
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
47,544
|
|
|
|
36,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,104,440
|
|
|
|
955,834
|
|
Less treasury
stock, 1,594,362 shares in 2005 and
3,083,516 shares in 2004, at cost
|
|
|
|
|
25,202
|
|
|
|
41,724
|
|
Total
shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
1,079,238
|
|
|
|
914,110
|
|
|
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,663,350
|
|
|
$
|
1,406,844
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
statements.
36
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders
Equity
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
Unearned
Compensation
|
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
|
Shares
|
|
Amount
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
Balance,
September 30, 2002
|
|
53,529
|
|
$
|
5,353
|
|
$
|
82,489
|
|
$
|
838,929
|
|
|
$
|
(190
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,180
|
|
|
|
3,518
|
|
|
$
|
(47,591
|
)
|
|
$
|
895,170
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,873
|
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
Unrealized
gains on available- for-sale securities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,005
|
|
Derivatives instruments
|
Amortization,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
Minimum
pension liability adjustment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
Total
other comprehensive gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,488
|
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,361
|
|
Cash
dividends ($.32 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,026
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,026
|
)
|
Exercise
of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
2,194
|
|
Tax
benefit of stock-based awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
Amortization
of deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
Balance,
September 30, 2003
|
|
53,529
|
|
|
5,353
|
|
|
83,302
|
|
|
840,776
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
33,668
|
|
|
|
3,389
|
|
|
|
(45,838
|
)
|
|
|
917,251
|
|
|
Comprehensive Income:
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,359
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
Unrealized
gains on available- for-sale securities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,721
|
|
Derivatives instruments
|
Amortization,
net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Minimum
pension liability adjustment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,209
|
)
|
Total
other comprehensive gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,943
|
|
Cash
dividends ($.3225 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,372
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,372
|
)
|
Exercise
of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
4,114
|
|
|
|
4,927
|
|
Tax
benefit of stock-based awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,351
|
|
Amortization
of deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Balance,
September 30, 2004
|
|
53,529
|
|
|
5,353
|
|
|
85,466
|
|
|
828,763
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,252
|
|
|
|
3,084
|
|
|
|
(41,724
|
)
|
|
|
914,110
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,606
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
Unrealized
gains on available-for-sale securities, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,708
|
|
Minimum
pension liability adjustment, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,416
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,416
|
)
|
Total
other comprehensive gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,292
|
|
Total
comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,898
|
|
Capital
adjustment of equity investee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,682
|
|
Stock
issued under Restricted Stock Award Plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
dividends ($.33 per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,989
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,989
|
)
|
Exercise
of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,485
|
)
|
|
|
16,455
|
|
|
|
25,358
|
|
Tax
benefit of stock-based awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,153
|
|
Amortization
of deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
Balance,
September 30, 2005
|
|
53,529
|
|
$
|
5,353
|
|
$
|
112,297
|
|
$
|
939,380
|
|
|
$
|
(134
|
)
|
|
$
|
47,544
|
|
|
|
1,594
|
|
|
$
|
(25,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,079,238
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
37
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
Net
income
|
|
|
|
$
|
127,606
|
|
|
$
|
4,359
|
|
|
$
|
17,873
|
|
Adjustments
to reconcile income
to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
96,274
|
|
|
|
94,425
|
|
|
|
82,513
|
|
Asset
impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in
(income) loss of affiliates before income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
(3,891
|
)
|
|
|
(1,168
|
)
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
Amortization
of deferred compensation
|
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
Gain on sale
of investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
(26,969
|
)
|
|
|
(22,766
|
)
|
|
|
(5,529
|
)
|
Non-monetary
investment gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,521
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale
of assets
|
|
|
|
|
(13,550
|
)
|
|
|
(5,377
|
)
|
|
|
(3,689
|
)
|
Deferred
income tax expense
|
|
|
|
|
38,014
|
|
|
|
5,934
|
|
|
|
41,391
|
|
Other
net
|
|
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
336
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities:
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
|
|
(46,223
|
)
|
|
|
(25,335
|
)
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
(487
|
)
|
|
|
1,707
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
24,142
|
|
|
|
(29,355
|
)
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
|
|
8,517
|
|
|
|
(378
|
)
|
|
|
(14,804
|
)
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
12,736
|
|
|
|
2,870
|
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
16,557
|
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
Other
noncurrent liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
2,526
|
|
|
|
6,997
|
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,632
|
|
|
|
132,281
|
|
|
|
75,242
|
|
Net cash
provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
212,238
|
|
|
|
136,640
|
|
|
|
93,115
|
|
|
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
(86,805
|
)
|
|
|
(90,212
|
)
|
|
|
(242,912
|
)
|
Proceeds from
asset sales
|
|
|
|
|
28,992
|
|
|
|
7,941
|
|
|
|
6,720
|
|
Purchase of
investments
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from
sale of investments
|
|
|
|
|
65,539
|
|
|
|
14,033
|
|
|
|
18,215
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
|
|
(68,238
|
)
|
|
|
(217,977
|
)
|
|
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from
long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Decrease
(increase) in short-term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Dividends
paid
|
|
|
|
|
(16,866
|
)
|
|
|
(16,222
|
)
|
|
|
(16,026
|
)
|
Proceeds from
exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
25,358
|
|
|
|
4,927
|
|
|
|
2,194
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
8,492
|
|
|
|
(41,295
|
)
|
|
|
116,168
|
|
|
Net increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
223,456
|
|
|
|
27,107
|
|
|
|
(8,694
|
)
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
65,296
|
|
|
|
38,189
|
|
|
|
46,883
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents, end of period
|
|
|
|
$
|
288,752
|
|
|
$
|
65,296
|
|
|
$
|
38,189
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
statements.
38
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
NOTE 1 SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING
POLICIES
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (the Company), and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. Fiscal years of the Companys foreign consolidated operations end on
August 31 to facilitate reporting of consolidated results. There were no significant intervening events which materially affected the financial
statements.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Certain amounts in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation.
TRANSLATION OF FOREIGN CURRENCIES
The Company has determined that the functional currency for its
foreign subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. Foreign currency transaction gains (losses) were $(.8) million, $(2.2) million and $.4 million for 2005, 2004,
and 2003, respectively. These amounts are included in direct operating costs.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated
financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated
depreciation. Substantially all property, plant and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the
assets (contract drilling equipment, 4-15 years; real estate buildings and equipment, 10-50 years; and other, 3-33 years). The Company charges the cost
of maintenance and repairs to direct operating cost, while betterments and refurbishments are capitalized.
CAPITALIZATION OF INTEREST
The Company capitalizes interest on major projects during
construction. Interest is capitalized based on the average interest rate on related debt. Capitalized interest for 2005, 2004, and 2003 was $.3
million, $.5 million, and $1.8 million, respectively.
VALUATION OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
The Company periodically evaluates the carrying value of
long-lived assets to be held and used, including intangible assets, when events or circumstances warrant such a review. The Company recognizes
impairment losses equal to the excess of the carrying value over the estimated fair value of long-lived assets used in
39
operations when indicators of impairment are present and the
undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the asset are not sufficient to recover the carrying amount of the asset.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash in banks and
investments readily convertible into cash which mature within three months from the date of purchase.
RESTRICTED CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Company had restricted cash and cash equivalents of $4.2
million and $2.0 million at September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. All restricted cash is for the purpose of potential insurance claims in the
Companys wholly-owned captive insurance company. Of the total, $2.0 million is from the initial capitalization of the captive and management has
elected to restrict an additional $2.2 million. The restricted amounts are primarily invested in short-term money market securities.
The restricted cash and cash equivalents is reflected in the
balance sheet as follows (in thousands):
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
Other current
assets
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,195
|
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
INVENTORIES AND SUPPLIES
Inventories and supplies are primarily replacement parts and
supplies held for use in the Companys drilling operations. Inventories and supplies are valued at the lower of cost (moving average or actual) or
market value.
DRILLING REVENUES
Contract drilling revenues are comprised primarily of daywork
drilling contracts for which the related revenues and expenses are recognized as work progresses. For certain contracts, the Company receives lump-sum
payments for the mobilization of rigs and other drilling equipment. Revenues earned, net of direct costs incurred for the mobilization, are deferred
and recognized over the term of the related drilling contract. Costs incurred to relocate rigs and other drilling equipment to areas in which a
contract has not been secured are expensed as incurred. Reimbursements received by the Company for out-of-pocket expenses are recorded as revenues and
direct costs.
RENT REVENUES
The Company enters into leases with tenants in its rental
properties consisting primarily of retail and multi-tenant warehouse space. The lease terms of tenants occupying space in the retail centers and
warehouse buildings range from one to eleven years. Minimum rents are recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related leases. Overage
and percentage rents are based on tenants sales volume. Recoveries from tenants for property taxes and operating expenses are recognized as Real
Estate revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The Companys rent revenues are as follows:
40
Years
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Minimum
rents
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,606
|
|
|
$
|
7,490
|
|
|
$
|
7,333
|
|
Overage and
percentage rents
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,162
|
|
|
$
|
1,207
|
|
|
$
|
768
|
|
At September 30, 2005, minimum future rental income to be
received on noncancelable operating leases were as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal
Year
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,887
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
6,134
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
4,840
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
3,532
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
2,901
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,059
|
|
Leasehold improvement allowances are capitalized and amortized
over the lease term.
INVESTMENTS
The Company maintains investments in equity securities of
unaffiliated companies. The cost of securities used in determining realized gains and losses is based on the average cost basis of the security sold.
Net income in 2004 includes approximately $1.5 million, $0.03 per share on a diluted basis, on gains related to non-monetary transactions within the
Companys available-for-sale investment portfolio which were accounted for at fair value.
The Company regularly reviews investment securities for
impairment based on criteria that include the extent to which the investments carrying value exceeds its related market value, the duration of
the market decline and the financial strength and specific prospects of the issuer of the security. Unrealized losses that are other than temporary are
recognized in earnings.
Investments in companies owned from 20 to 50 percent are
accounted for using the equity method with the Company recognizing its proportionate share of the income or loss of each investee. The Company owned
approximately 21.7 percent of Atwood Oceanics, Inc. (Atwood) at September 30, 2004. In October 2004, the Company sold 1,000,000 shares of its position
in Atwood as part of a 2,175,000 share public offering of Atwood. The sale generated $15.9 million ($0.31 per diluted share) of net income in fiscal
2005. As a result of Atwoods capital transaction, the Companys equity investment increased by $4.3 million, deferred income taxes payable
increased $1.6 million and additional paid-in-capital increased $2.7 million. With its remaining 2,000,000 shares of Atwood, the Company owns
approximately 13.0 percent of Atwood. The Company
41
continues to account for Atwood on the equity method as the
Company continues to have significant influence through its board of director seats.
The quoted market value of the Companys investment was
$168.4 million and $142.6 million at September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Retained earnings at September 30, 2005 and 2004 includes approximately
$24.3 million and $29.0 million, respectively of undistributed earnings of Atwood.
Summarized financial information of Atwood is as
follows:
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Gross
revenues
|
|
|
|
$
|
176,156
|
|
|
$
|
163,454
|
|
|
$
|
144,766
|
|
Costs and
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
149,785
|
|
|
|
155,867
|
|
|
|
157,568
|
|
Net income
(loss)
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,371
|
|
|
$
|
7,587
|
|
|
$
|
(12,802
|
)
|
Helmerich &
Payne, Inc.s equity in net income
(loss), net of income taxes
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,412
|
|
|
$
|
724
|
|
|
$
|
(1,414
|
)
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
$
|
93,283
|
|
|
$
|
92,966
|
|
|
$
|
76,012
|
|
Noncurrent
assets
|
|
|
|
|
403,641
|
|
|
|
405,970
|
|
|
|
446,662
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
56,159
|
|
|
|
60,053
|
|
|
|
49,949
|
|
Noncurrent
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
78,268
|
|
|
|
167,294
|
|
|
|
209,258
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
362,497
|
|
|
|
271,589
|
|
|
|
263,467
|
|
|
Helmerich &
Payne, Inc.s investment
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,533
|
|
|
$
|
57,824
|
|
|
$
|
56,655
|
|
INCOME TAXES
Deferred income taxes are computed using the liability method and
are provided on all temporary differences between the financial basis and the tax basis of the Companys assets and liabilities.
POST EMPLOYMENT AND OTHER BENEFITS
The Company sponsors a health care plan that provides post
retirement medical benefits to retired employees. Employees who retire after November 1, 1992 and elect to participate in the plan pay the entire
estimated cost of such benefits.
The Company has accrued a liability for estimated workers
compensation claims incurred. The liability for other benefits to former or inactive employees after employment but before retirement is not
material.
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted-average number
of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share includes the dilutive effect of stock options and restricted
stock.
42
EMPLOYEE STOCK-BASED AWARDS
Employee stock-based awards are currently accounted for under
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and related interpretations. Fixed plan common stock
options generally do not result in compensation expense, because the exercise price of the options issued by the Company equals the market price of the
underlying stock on the date of grant. The plans under which the Company issues stock based awards are described more fully in Note 5. The following
table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
Net income, as
reported
|
|
|
|
$
|
127,606
|
|
|
$
|
4,359
|
|
|
$
|
17,873
|
|
Stock-based
employee compensation expense included in the Consolidated Statements of Income, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
Total
stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects
|
|
|
|
|
(3,563
|
)
|
|
|
(4,172
|
)
|
|
|
(4,387
|
)
|
Pro forma net
income
|
|
|
|
$
|
124,059
|
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
$
|
13,598
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
Basic-as
reported
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
Basic-pro
forma
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.43
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
Diluted-as
reported
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.09
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
Diluted-pro
forma
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
These pro forma amounts may not be representative of future
disclosures since the estimated fair value of stock options is amortized to expense over the vesting period and additional options may be granted in
future years.
TREASURY STOCK
Treasury stock purchases are accounted for under the cost method
whereby the cost of the acquired stock is recorded as treasury stock. Gains and losses on the subsequent reissuance of shares are credited or charged
to additional paid-in-capital using the average-cost method.
NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARD
In December, 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation. Statement 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and amends FASB
Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. The statement requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock
options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair value. The statement is effective at the beginning of the first interim or
annual period beginning after June 15, 2005, with the SEC allowing for implementation at the beginning of the
43
first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company
plans to adopt the new standard the first quarter of fiscal 2006, beginning October 1, 2005, under the modified-prospective-transition method. The
Company will recognize compensation cost for share-based payments to employees based on their grant-date fair value from the beginning of the fiscal
period in which the recognition provisions are first applied. Measurement and attribution of compensation cost for awards that were granted but not
vested prior to the date the Company adopts the new standard will be based on the same estimate of the grant-date fair value and the same attribution
method used previously under Statement 123 for pro forma disclosure. For those awards that are granted, modified or settled after the Company adopts
the Statement, compensation cost will be measured and recognized in the financial statements in accordance with the provision of Statement 123(R). The
Company expects to incur additional pre-tax compensation expense of approximately $1.3 million related to options currently outstanding in the first
quarter of fiscal 2006 as a result of adopting Statement 123(R). Statement 123(R) also requires that the benefits of tax deductions in excess of
recognized compensation cost be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than an operating cash flow as required under current literature. This
requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after the effective date. The Company cannot estimate
what those amounts will be in the future because they depend on, among other things, when employees exercise stock options.
NOTE 2 IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED
ASSETS
The Company periodically evaluates long-lived assets when events
or circumstances indicate, in managements judgment, that the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. Changes that could trigger
such an assessment may include a significant decline in revenue or cash margin per day, extended periods of low rig utilization, changes in market
demand for a specific asset, obsolescence, completion of specific contracts, and/or overall general market conditions. If a review of the long-lived
assets indicates that the carrying value of certain of these assets is more than the estimated undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment charge is
made to adjust the carrying value to the estimated fair market value of the asset.
Based on its analysis, the Company recorded a $51.5 million
pre-tax impairment charge to the Offshore Platform segment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004. In conjunction with the impairment charge, the Company
retired rig 108 at September 30, 2004, which brought the number of available platform rigs to eleven. The Company also reduced the depreciable lives of
five platform rigs to four years and the salvage value of each of the offshore rigs to $1.0 million. As a result of the impairment charge and the
change in depreciable lives and salvage values, depreciation expense in the Offshore Platform segment was reduced by approximately $1.5 million in
fiscal year 2005.
44
NOTE 3 NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM
DEBT
At September 30, 2005, the Company had $200 million in unsecured
long-term debt outstanding at fixed rates and maturities as summarized in the following table.
Issue
Amount
|
|
|
|
Maturity Date
|
|
Interest Rate
|
$25,000
|
|
|
|
August
15, 2007
|
|
|
5.51
|
%
|
$25,000
|
|
|
|
August
15, 2009
|
|
|
5.91
|
%
|
$75,000
|
|
|
|
August
15, 2012
|
|
|
6.46
|
%
|
$75,000
|
|
|
|
August
15, 2014
|
|
|
6.56
|
%
|
The terms of the debt obligations require the Company to maintain
a minimum ratio of debt to total capitalization. The debt is held by various entities, including $8 million held by a company affiliated
with one of
the Companys Board members.
At September 30, 2005, the Company had a committed unsecured line
of credit totaling $50 million. Letters of credit totaling $14 million were outstanding against the line, leaving $36 million available to borrow.
Under terms of the line of credit, the Company must maintain certain financial ratios including debt to total capitalization and debt to earnings
before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, and a certain level of tangible net worth. The interest rate varies based on LIBOR plus .875 to
1.125 percent or prime minus 1.75 percent to prime minus 1.50 percent depending on ratios described above. At September 30, 2005 and 2004, no balances
were outstanding under the line of credit. The revolving credit commitment expires July 11, 2006.
NOTE 4 INCOME TAXES
The components of the provision (benefit) for income taxes are as
follows:
Years
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Current:
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,139
|
|
|
$
|
(5,997
|
)
|
|
$
|
(34,495
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
8,185
|
|
|
|
4,622
|
|
|
|
6,870
|
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
2,125
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,449
|
|
|
|
(1,569
|
)
|
|
|
(26,742
|
)
|
Deferred:
|
Federal
|
|
|
|
|
31,573
|
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
|
|
42,835
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
4,863
|
|
|
|
1,902
|
|
|
|
(3,383
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
1,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,014
|
|
|
|
5,934
|
|
|
|
41,391
|
|
Total provision
(benefit)
|
|
|
|
$
|
87,463
|
|
|
$
|
4,365
|
|
|
$
|
14,649
|
|
45
The amounts of domestic and foreign income before income taxes
and equity in income (loss) of affiliates are as follows:
Years
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
|
$
|
195,978
|
|
|
$
|
(2,565
|
)
|
|
$
|
31,638
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
16,679
|
|
|
|
10,565
|
|
|
|
2,304
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
212,657
|
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
$
|
33,942
|
|
Deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary differences
between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of the Companys assets and liabilities.
The components of the Companys net deferred tax liabilities
are as follows:
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Deferred tax
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property,
plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
$
|
210,861
|
|
|
$
|
188,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
31,929
|
|
|
|
28,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
investments
|
|
|
|
|
20,915
|
|
|
|
17,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
1,715
|
|
|
|
1,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
265,420
|
|
|
|
235,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
Pension
reserves
|
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
7,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
reserves
|
|
|
|
|
3,943
|
|
|
|
4,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating
loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
|
|
32,567
|
|
|
|
56,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum tax
credit carryforwards
|
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
3,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
accruals
|
|
|
|
|
11,295
|
|
|
|
7,848
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
58,555
|
|
|
|
80,859
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation
allowance
|
|
|
|
|
31,345
|
|
|
|
35,136
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred
tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
27,210
|
|
|
|
45,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred
tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
$
|
238,210
|
|
|
$
|
190,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications have been made to the fiscal 2004 balances for
certain components of deferred tax assets and liabilities in order to conform to the current years presentation.
As of September 30, 2005 the Company had foreign net operating
loss carryforwards for income tax purposes of $4.9 million, of which a significant portion can be carried forward indefinitely, and foreign tax credit
carryforwards of approximately $31.0 million which will expire in years 2010 through 2014. The valuation allowance is primarily attributable to foreign
operating loss carryforwards and foreign tax credit carryforwards for which utilization is uncertain. At this time the Company has no plans to utilize
the repatriation provision under the American Jobs Creation Act.
46
Effective income tax rates as compared to the U.S Federal income
tax rate are as follows:
Years
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Federal
income tax rate
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
Effect of
foreign taxes
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
State income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective
income tax rate
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
55
|
%
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
NOTE 5 SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
The Company has several plans providing for common-stock based awards to employees and to non-employee directors. The plans permit the
granting of various types of awards including stock options and restricted stock. Restricted stock may be granted for no consideration other than prior
and future services. The purchase price per share for stock options may not be less than market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant.
Stock options expire ten years after grant.
Vesting requirements are determined by the Human Resources Committee of the Companys Board of Directors. Options granted December 6,
1995, began vesting December 6, 1998, with 20 percent of the options vesting for five consecutive years. Options granted December 4, 1996, began
vesting December 4, 1997, with 20 percent of the options vesting for five consecutive years. Options granted since December 3, 1997, began vesting one
year after the grant date with 25 percent of the options vesting for four consecutive years.
In March 2001, the Company adopted the 2000 Stock Incentive Plan (the Stock Incentive Plan). The Stock Incentive Plan was
effective December 6, 2000 and will terminate December 6, 2010. Under this plan, the Company is authorized to grant options for up to 3,000,000 shares
of the Companys common stock at an exercise price not less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Up to 450,000
shares of the total authorized may be granted to participants as restricted stock awards. In 2005, 5,000 shares of restricted stock awards were
granted. There were no restricted stock grants in fiscal 2004 or 2003.
The following summary reflects the stock option activity for the Companys common stock and related information for 2005, 2004, and 2003
(shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
Outstanding at
October 1,
|
|
|
|
|
4,457
|
|
|
$
|
22.03
|
|
|
|
4,327
|
|
|
$
|
21.41
|
|
|
|
3,875
|
|
|
$
|
20.28
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
32.02
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
24.18
|
|
|
|
611
|
|
|
|
27.74
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
(1,611
|
)
|
|
|
19.57
|
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
16.15
|
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
|
|
16.93
|
|
Forfeited/Expired
|
|
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
27.22
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
25.38
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
23.85
|
|
Outstanding on September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
|
$
|
24.57
|
|
|
|
4,457
|
|
|
$
|
22.03
|
|
|
|
4,327
|
|
|
$
|
21.41
|
|
Exercisable on September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
$
|
22.74
|
|
|
|
2,997
|
|
|
$
|
20.62
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
$
|
19.34
|
|
Shares available to grant
|
|
|
|
|
755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
The following table summarizes information about stock options at
September 30, 2005 (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
Stock Options
|
|
Exercisable
Stock Options
|
Range
of
Exercise Prices
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted-Average
Remaining Life
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Options
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
$12.79
to $19.83
|
|
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
$16.35
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
$16.35
|
$22.66
to $24.59
|
|
|
|
|
1,366
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
$23.73
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
$23.79
|
$26.11
to $32.02
|
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
6.6
|
|
|
$29.26
|
|
|
565
|
|
|
$27.86
|
$12.79
to $32.02
|
|
|
|
|
3,244
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
$24.57
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
$22.74
|
The weighted-average fair value of options at their grant date
during 2005, 2004, and 2003 was $12.17, $10.24, and $10.72, respectively. The estimated fair value of each option granted is calculated using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The following summarizes the weighted-average assumptions used in the model:
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
%
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
Expected stock
volatility
|
|
|
|
|
40.3
|
%
|
|
|
44.0
|
%
|
|
|
45.0
|
%
|
Dividend
yield
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
.8
|
%
|
|
|
.8
|
%
|
Expected years
until exercise
|
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
On September 30, 2005, the Company had 51,934,590 outstanding
common stock purchase rights (Rights) pursuant to terms of the Rights Agreement dated January 8, 1996. Under the terms of the Rights
Agreement each Right entitled the holder thereof to purchase from the Company one half of one unit consisting of one one-thousandth of a share of
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (Preferred Stock), without par value, at a price of $90 per unit. The exercise price and the
number of units of Preferred Stock issuable on exercise of the Rights are subject to adjustment in certain cases to prevent dilution. The Rights will
be attached to the common stock certificates and are not exercisable or transferrable apart from the common stock, until ten business days after a
person acquires 15 percent or more of the outstanding common stock or ten business days following the commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer
that would result in a person owning 15 percent or more of the outstanding common stock. In the event the Company is acquired in a merger or certain
other business combination transactions (including one in which the Company is the surviving corporation), or more than 50 percent of the
Companys assets or earning power is sold or transferred, each holder of a Right shall have the right to receive, upon exercise of the Right,
common stock of the acquiring company having a value equal to two times the exercise price of the Right. The Rights are redeemable under certain
circumstances at $0.01 per Right and will expire, unless earlier redeemed, on January 31, 2006. As long as the Rights are not separately transferrable,
the Company will issue one half of one Right with each new share of common stock issued.
48
NOTE 6 EARNINGS PER SHARE
A reconciliation of the weighted-average common shares
outstanding on a basic and diluted basis is as follows:
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Basic
weighted-average shares
|
|
|
|
|
51,087
|
|
|
|
50,312
|
|
|
|
50,039
|
|
Effect of
dilutive shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
options
|
|
|
|
|
945
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
555
|
|
Restricted
stock
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
Diluted
weighted-average shares
|
|
|
|
|
52,033
|
|
|
|
50,833
|
|
|
|
50,596
|
|
At September 30, 2005, all options outstanding were included in
the computation of diluted earnings per common share.
At September 30, 2004, options to purchase 1,027,680 shares of
common stock at a weighted-average price of $27.84 were outstanding, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share.
Inclusion of these shares would be antidilutive.
At September 30, 2003, options to purchase 1,030,791 shares of
common stock at a weighted-average price of $27.86 were outstanding but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common share.
Inclusion of these shares would be antidilutive.
NOTE 7 FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company had $200 million of long-term debt outstanding at
September 30, 2005 which had an estimated fair value of $215 million. The debt was valued based on the prices of similar securities with similar terms
and credit ratings. The Company used the expertise of an outside investment banking firm to assist with the estimate of the fair value of the long-term
debt. The Companys line of credit and notes payable bear interest at market rates and the cost of borrowings, if any, would approximate fair
value. The estimated fair value of the Companys available-for-sale securities is primarily based on market quotes.
49
The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities,
which excludes those accounted for under the equity method of accounting (see Note 1) and assets held in a Non-qualified Supplemental Savings
Plan:
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
Equity Securities:
|
September
30, 2005
|
|
|
|
$30,937
|
|
$94,000
|
|
$
|
|
$124,937
|
September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
$27,811
|
|
$70,448
|
|
$170
|
|
$ 98,089
|
During the years ended September 30, 2005, 2004, and 2003,
marketable equity available-for-sale securities with a fair value at the date of sale of $46.7 million, $30.9 million, and $18.2 million, respectively,
were sold. For the same years, the gross realized gains on such sales of available-for-sale securities totaled $27.0 million, $22.8 million, and $8.6
million, respectively, and the gross realized losses totaled $7 thousand in fiscal 2004 and $3.1 million in fiscal 2003.
The assets held in a Non-qualified Supplemental Savings Plan are
valued at fair market which totaled $7.0 million and $5.6 million at September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates
fair value due to the short maturity of those investments.
The carrying value of other assets, accrued liabilities and other
liabilities approximated fair value at September 30, 2005 and 2004.
50
NOTE 8 ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(LOSS)
The table below presents changes in the components of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss).
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
Appreciation
(Depreciation)
on Securities
|
|
Interest
Rate
Swap
|
|
Minimum
Pension
Liability
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
Balance
at September 30, 2002
|
|
|
|
|
$24,846
|
|
|
$
|
(1,054
|
)
|
|
|
$(7,612
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,180
|
|
2003
Change:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-income
tax amount
|
|
|
|
|
29,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,421
|
|
|
|
32,152
|
|
Income
tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
(11,298
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(920
|
)
|
|
|
(12,218
|
)
|
Amortization
of swap
(net of $602 income tax benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
Realized
gains in net income
(net of $2,101 income tax)
|
|
|
|
|
(3,428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,428
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,005
|
|
|
|
982
|
|
|
|
1,501
|
|
|
|
17,488
|
|
Balance
at September 30, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
39,851
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
(6,111
|
)
|
|
|
33,668
|
|
2004 Change:
|
Pre-income
tax amount
|
|
|
|
|
31,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,951
|
)
|
|
|
29,469
|
|
Income
tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
(11,940
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
(11,198
|
)
|
Amortization
of swap
(net of $45 income tax benefit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Realized
gains in net income
(net of $9,659 income tax)
|
|
|
|
|
(15,759
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,759
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,721
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(1,209
|
)
|
|
|
2,584
|
|
Balance
at September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
43,572
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,320
|
)
|
|
|
36,252
|
|
2005
Change:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-income
tax amount
|
|
|
|
|
24,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,510
|
)
|
|
|
19,078
|
|
Income
tax provision
|
|
|
|
|
(9,343
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,094
|
|
|
|
(7,249
|
)
|
Realized
gains in net income
(net of $328 income tax)
|
|
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,416
|
)
|
|
|
11,292
|
|
Balance
at September 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
$58,280
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
$(10,736
|
)
|
|
$
|
47,544
|
|
51
NOTE 9 EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company maintains a noncontributory defined pension plan for
substantially all U.S. employees who meet certain age and service requirements. In July 2003, the Company revised the Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
Employee Retirement Plan (Pension Plan) to close the Pension Plan to new participants effective October 1, 2003, and reduce benefit
accruals for current participants through September 30, 2006 at which time benefit accruals will be discontinued and the Pension Plan
frozen.
The following table and other information in this footnote
provide information at September 30 as to the Company sponsored domestic defined pension plan as required by SFAS No. 132 (Revised 2003),
Employers Disclosures About Pensions and Other Postretirement Benefits.
Change in benefit obligation:
Years
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Benefit
obligation at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
$
|
82,222
|
|
|
$
|
71,174
|
|
Service
cost
|
|
|
|
|
3,480
|
|
|
|
3,943
|
|
Interest
cost
|
|
|
|
|
4,617
|
|
|
|
4,403
|
|
Actuarial
loss
|
|
|
|
|
3,408
|
|
|
|
5,985
|
|
Benefits
paid
|
|
|
|
|
(3,510
|
)
|
|
|
(3,283
|
)
|
Benefit
obligation at end of year
|
|
|
|
$
|
90,217
|
|
|
$
|
82,222
|
|
Change in plan assets:
Years
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Fair value of
plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
$
|
56,650
|
|
|
$
|
53,635
|
|
Actual gain on
plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
7,565
|
|
|
|
6,298
|
|
Employer
contribution
|
|
|
|
|
2,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits
paid
|
|
|
|
|
(3,510
|
)
|
|
|
(3,283
|
)
|
Fair value of
plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
|
$
|
62,955
|
|
|
$
|
56,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
of the plan
|
|
|
|
$
|
(27,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,572
|
)
|
Unrecognized
net actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
17,445
|
|
|
|
18,211
|
|
Unrecognized
prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss (before tax)
|
|
|
|
|
(17,317
|
)
|
|
|
(11,807
|
)
|
Accrued benefit
cost
|
|
|
|
$
|
(27,133
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,167
|
)
|
Weighted-average assumptions:
Years
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Discount
rate
|
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.25
|
%
|
Expected return
on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
Rate of
compensation increase
|
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
52
The Company anticipates funding of its Pension Plan will be
approximately $2.8 million in fiscal 2006.
COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC PENSION EXPENSE:
Years
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Service
cost
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,480
|
|
|
$
|
3,943
|
|
|
$
|
5,401
|
|
Interest
cost
|
|
|
|
|
4,617
|
|
|
|
4,403
|
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
Expected return
on plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
(4,378
|
)
|
|
|
(4,232
|
)
|
|
|
(3,807
|
)
|
Amortization of
prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
Recognized net
actuarial loss
|
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
Curtailment
gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
Net pension
expense
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,706
|
|
|
$
|
4,894
|
|
|
$
|
7,831
|
|
The following table reflects the expected benefits to be paid
from the Pension Plan in each of the next five fiscal years, and in the aggregate for the five years thereafter.
Years
Ended September 30,
|
2006
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2010
|
|
2011-2015
|
|
Total
|
(in
thousands)
|
$4,640
|
|
$4,606
|
|
$4,524
|
|
$4,558
|
|
$4,533
|
|
$26,368
|
|
$49,229
|
Included in the Pension Plan is an unfunded supplemental
executive retirement plan.
The accumulated benefit obligation for the defined Pension Plan
was $90.1 million, $75.7 million and $66.1 million at September 30, 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.
The Company evaluates the Pension Plan to determine whether any
additional minimum liability is required. As a result of changes in the interest rates, an adjustment to the minimum pension liability was required.
The adjustment to the liability is recorded as a charge to accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, in shareholders equity in the
consolidated balance sheets.
INVESTMENT STRATEGY AND ASSET ALLOCATION
The Companys investment policy and strategies are
established with a long-term view in mind. The investment strategy is intended to help pay the cost of the Plan while providing adequate security to
meet the benefits promised under the Plan. The Company maintains a diversified asset mix to minimize the risk of a material loss to the portfolio value
that might occur from devaluation of any one investment. In determining the appropriate asset mix, the Companys financial strength and ability to
fund potential shortfalls are considered.
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on
historical and projected rates of return for current and planned asset classes in the Plans investment portfolio after analyzing historical
experience and future expectations of the return and volatility of various asset classes.
53
The target allocation for 2006 and the asset allocation for the
domestic Pension Plan at the end of fiscal 2005 and 2004, by asset category, follows:
|
|
|
Target
Allocation
|
|
Percentage
of Plan Assets
At September 30,
|
Asset
Category
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
U.S.
equities
|
|
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
%
|
International
equities
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Fixed
income
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
Real
estate and other
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of plan assets was $63.0 million and $56.7 million
at September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and the expected long-term rate of return on these plan assets was 8 percent in 2005 and
2004.
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION PLAN
Substantially all employees on the United States payroll of the
Company may elect to participate in the Company sponsored 401(k)/Thrift Plan by contributing a portion of their earnings. The Company contributes
amounts equal to 100 percent of the first 5 percent of the participants compensation subject to certain limitations. Expensed Company
contributions were $6.1 million, $5.6 million, and $5.6 million in 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively.
NOTE 10 SUPPLEMENTAL BALANCE SHEET
INFORMATION
The following reflects the activity in the Companys reserve
for bad debt for 2005, 2004 and 2003:
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Reserve for bad
debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
October 1,
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,265
|
|
|
$
|
1,319
|
|
|
$
|
1,337
|
|
Provision for
bad debt
|
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
Write-off of
bad debt
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
Balance at
September 30,
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,791
|
|
|
$
|
1,265
|
|
|
$
|
1,319
|
|
54
Accounts receivable, prepaid expenses, and accrued liabilities at
September 30 consist of the following:
September
30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Accounts
receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
|
|
|
$
|
162,646
|
|
|
$
|
116,423
|
|
Investment
sales receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
162,646
|
|
|
$
|
133,262
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses and other:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid value
added tax
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,960
|
|
|
$
|
1,514
|
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
|
|
2,195
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Income tax
asset
|
|
|
|
|
2,080
|
|
|
|
5,831
|
|
Prepaid
insurance
|
|
|
|
|
1,949
|
|
|
|
1,329
|
|
Deferred
mobilization
|
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
|
|
2,846
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
5,483
|
|
|
|
8,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,321
|
|
|
$
|
21,600
|
|
|
Accrued
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes payable
operations
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,263
|
|
|
$
|
6,531
|
|
Workers
compensation liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
3,830
|
|
|
|
2,877
|
|
Payroll and
employee benefits
|
|
|
|
|
20,277
|
|
|
|
8,678
|
|
Deferred
income/prepays
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,844
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
10,257
|
|
|
|
10,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
44,627
|
|
|
$
|
31,891
|
|
NOTE 11 SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Years
Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Cash
payments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid,
net of amounts capitalized
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,707
|
|
|
$
|
12,653
|
|
|
$
|
11,375
|
|
Income taxes
paid
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,715
|
|
|
$
|
7,010
|
|
|
$
|
5,838
|
|
NOTE 12 RISK FACTORS
CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT
Financial instruments which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of temporary cash investments and trade receivables. The Company places temporary cash investments with
established financial institutions and invests in a diversified portfolio of highly rated, short-term money market instruments. The Companys
trade receivables are primarily with established companies in the oil and gas industry and are typically not secured by collateral. The Company
provides an allowance for doubtful accounts, when necessary, to cover estimated credit losses. Such an allowance is based on managements
knowledge of customer accounts. No significant credit losses have been experienced by the Company.
55
SELF-INSURANCE
The Company self-insures a significant portion of its expected
losses under its workers compensation, general, and automobile liability programs. Insurance coverage has been purchased for individual claims
that exceed $1 million or $2 million, depending on whether a claim occurs inside or outside of the United States. The Company records estimates for
incurred outstanding liabilities for unresolved workers compensation, general liability claims and for claims that are incurred but not reported.
Estimates are based on historic experience and statistical methods that the Company believes are reliable. Nonetheless, insurance estimates include
certain assumptions and management judgments regarding the frequency and severity of claims, claim development, and settlement practices. Unanticipated
changes in these factors may produce materially different amounts of expense that would be reported under these programs.
The Company formed a wholly-owned captive insurance company,
White Eagle Assurance Company (White Eagle), to provide property damage insurance for company-owned drilling rigs. The Company obtained 85 percent of
land rig property insurance from a third party insurance provider in 2005 that carried a $1.0 million deductible. The Company is self insured through
White Eagle for the remaining 15 percent of land rig property coverage and the $1.0 million deductible on all rig property. Additionally, the Company
is self insured for up to $1.0 million per occurrence deductible under workers compensation, general, and automobile liability insurance policies for
its international operations. Premiums paid to White Eagle by the drilling segments have been included in the drilling segment expenses but eliminated,
along with the premium earned income, in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
CONTRACT DRILLING OPERATIONS
International drilling operations are significant contributors to
the Companys revenues and net profit. It is possible that operating results could be affected by the risks of such activities, including economic
conditions in the international markets in which the Company operates, political and economic instability, fluctuations in currency exchange rates,
changes in international regulatory requirements, international employment issues, and the burden of complying with foreign laws. These risks may
adversely affect the Companys future operating results and financial position.
The Company is exposed to risks of currency devaluation in
Venezuela primarily as a result of bolivar receivable balances and bolivar cash balances. In Venezuela, approximately 40 percent of the Companys
billings to the Venezuelan oil company, PDVSA, are in U.S. dollars and 60 percent are in the local currency, the bolivar. In January 2003, the
Venezuelan government put into effect exchange controls that fixed the exchange rate at 1600 bolivares to one U.S. dollar and also prohibited the
Company, as well as other companies, from converting the bolivar into U.S. dollars. In compliance with applicable regulations, the Company on October
1, 2003 submitted a request to the Venezuelan government seeking permission to convert existing bolivar balances into U.S. dollars. In January 2004,
the Venezuelan government approved the conversion of bolivar cash balances to U.S. dollars and the remittance of those U.S. dollars as dividends by the
Companys Venezuelan subsidiary to the U.S. based parent. The Company was able to remit $8.8 million of such dividends in January 2004. This
reduced the Companys exposure to currency devaluation in Venezuela.
56
As stated above, the Company is exposed to risks of currency
devaluation in Venezuela primarily as a result of bolivar receivable balances and bolivar cash balances. The exchange rate was 2150 bolivares and 1920
bolivares at September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. As a result of the 12 percent devaluation of the bolivar during fiscal 2005 (from September
2004 through August 2005), the Company experienced total devaluation losses of $.6 million during that same period. This 12 percent devaluation loss
may not be reflective of the potential for future devaluation losses because of the exchange controls that are currently in place. However, the exact
amount and timing of such devaluation is uncertain. While the Company is unable to predict future devaluation in Venezuela, if fiscal 2006 activity
levels are similar to fiscal 2005 and if a 10 percent to 20 percent devaluation would occur, the Company could experience potential currency
devaluation losses ranging from approximately $1.6 million to $2.9 million.
In late August 2003, the Venezuelan state petroleum company
agreed, on a go-forward basis, to pay a portion of the Companys dollar-based invoices in U.S. dollars. Were this agreement to end, the Company
would revert back to receiving these payments in bolivares and thus increase bolivar cash balances and exposure to devaluation.
On September 28, 2005, the Company made application with the
Venezuelan government requesting the approval to convert bolivar cash balances to U.S. dollars. Upon approval from the Venezuelan government, the
Companys Venezuelan subsidiary will remit those dollars as a dividend to its U.S. based parent, thus reducing the Companys exposure to
currency devaluation.
Venezuela continues to experience significant governmental
instability. In the event that extended labor strikes occur or turmoil increases, the Company could experience shortages in material and supplies
necessary to operate some or all of its Venezuelan drilling rigs.
NOTE 13 CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND
COMMITMENTS
COMMITMENTS
During fiscal year 2005, the Company entered into separate
drilling contracts with eight exploration and production customers to build and operate a total of 25 new FlexRigs (see Note 15 Subsequent Events
regarding construction of an additional 25 new FlexRigs). The construction cost is estimated to average approximately $11 million to $14 million per
rig, depending on equipment requirements. The construction began in the third quarter of fiscal 2005 and is estimated to continue into the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2007. During construction, rig construction costs will be recorded in construction in progress and then transferred to contract
drilling equipment when the rig is placed in the field for service. Equipment, parts and supplies are ordered in advance to promote efficient
construction progress. At September 30, 2005, the Company had commitments outstanding of approximately $96.2 million for the purchase of drilling
equipment.
57
LEASES
In May 2003, the Company signed a six-year lease for
approximately 114,000 square feet of office space near downtown Tulsa, Oklahoma. The lease agreement contains rent escalation clauses, which have been
included in the future minimum lease payments below, and a renewal option. Leasehold improvements made at the inception of the lease were capitalized
and are being amortized over the initial lease term. The Company also conducts certain operations in leased premises and leases telecommunication
equipment. Future minimum lease payments required under noncancelable operating leases as of September 30, 2005 are as follows (in
thousands):
Fiscal
Year
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,095
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
2,470
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
1,615
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
482
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,231
|
|
Total rent expense was $2.3 million, $2.0 million and $1.1
million for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
CONTINGENCIES
In August 2005, the Companys Rig 201, which operates on an
operators tension-leg platform in the Gulf of Mexico, lost its entire derrick and suffered significant damage as a result of Hurricane Katrina.
Pre-tax cash flow from the platform rig was approximately $5.4 million in fiscal 2005. The Company is still in the process of assessing the damage to
the rig and does not anticipate that it will return to service in 2006. The rig was insured at a value that approximated replacement cost to cover the
net book value and any additional losses. Therefore, the Company expects to record a gain resulting from the receipt of insurance proceeds. Because the
damage assessment has not been completed, the Company is unable to estimate the amount or timing of the gain. Capital costs incurred in conjunction
with any repairs will be capitalized and depreciated as described in Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.
NOTE 14 SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company operates principally in the contract drilling
industry. The Companys contract drilling business includes the following operating segments: U.S. Land, U.S. Offshore Platform, and
International. The contract drilling operations consist mainly of contracting Company-owned drilling equipment primarily to major oil and gas
exploration companies. The Companys primary international areas of operation include Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Argentina and Bolivia. The
Company also has a Real Estate segment whose operations are conducted exclusively in the metropolitan area of Tulsa, Oklahoma. The key areas of
operations include
58
a shopping center and several multi-tenant warehouses. Each
reportable segment is a strategic business unit which is managed separately. Other includes investments and corporate operations.
The Company evaluates performance of its segments based upon
operating income or loss from operations before income taxes which includes:
|
|
revenues from external and internal customers
|
|
|
allocated general and administrative costs
|
but excludes corporate costs for other depreciation and other
income and expense. General and administrative costs are allocated to the segments based primarily on specific identification, and to the extent that
such identification is not practical, on other methods which the Company believes to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of services
provided. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Intersegment
sales are accounted for in the same manner as sales to unaffiliated customers.
59
Summarized financial information of the Companys reportable
segments for each of the years ended September 30, 2005, 2004, and 2003 is shown in the following table:
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
External
Sales
|
|
Inter-
Segment
|
|
Total
Sales
|
|
Operating
Income
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
Additions
to Long-Lived
Assets
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
Drilling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Land
|
|
|
|
$
|
527,637
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
527,637
|
|
|
$
|
164,657
|
|
|
$
|
60,222
|
|
|
$
|
809,403
|
|
|
$
|
70,297
|
|
U.S.
Offshore
|
|
|
|
|
84,921
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,921
|
|
|
|
17,708
|
|
|
|
10,602
|
|
|
|
95,108
|
|
|
|
1,058
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
177,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,480
|
|
|
|
18,973
|
|
|
|
20,107
|
|
|
|
239,087
|
|
|
|
12,438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
790,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
790,038
|
|
|
|
201,338
|
|
|
|
90,931
|
|
|
|
1,143,598
|
|
|
|
83,793
|
|
Real
Estate
|
|
|
|
|
10,688
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
11,449
|
|
|
|
4,714
|
|
|
|
2,352
|
|
|
|
32,203
|
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
(26,846
|
)
|
|
|
2,991
|
|
|
|
487,549
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
800,726
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
800,726
|
|
|
$
|
179,206
|
|
|
$
|
96,274
|
|
|
$
|
1,663,350
|
|
|
|
86,805
|
|
|
2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
Drilling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Land
|
|
|
|
$
|
346,015
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
346,015
|
|
|
$
|
35,545
|
|
|
$
|
56,528
|
|
|
$
|
742,642
|
|
|
$
|
69,920
|
|
U.S.
Offshore
|
|
|
|
|
84,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84,238
|
|
|
|
(35,628
|
)
|
|
|
12,107
|
|
|
|
102,557
|
|
|
|
1,512
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
148,788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,788
|
|
|
|
12,126
|
|
|
|
20,530
|
|
|
|
261,893
|
|
|
|
9,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
579,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
579,041
|
|
|
|
12,043
|
|
|
|
89,165
|
|
|
|
1,107,092
|
|
|
|
80,945
|
|
Real
Estate
|
|
|
|
|
10,015
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
10,912
|
|
|
|
3,198
|
|
|
|
2,253
|
|
|
|
33,044
|
|
|
|
3,538
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,503
|
)
|
|
|
3,007
|
|
|
|
266,708
|
|
|
|
5,729
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
|
(897
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
589,056
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
589,056
|
|
|
$
|
(12,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
94,425
|
|
|
$
|
1,406,844
|
|
|
$
|
90,212
|
|
|
2003:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
Drilling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Land
|
|
|
|
$
|
273,179
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
273,179
|
|
|
$
|
17,751
|
|
|
$
|
44,726
|
|
|
$
|
730,642
|
|
|
$
|
213,201
|
|
U.S.
Offshore
|
|
|
|
|
112,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,259
|
|
|
|
35,932
|
|
|
|
12,799
|
|
|
|
170,580
|
|
|
|
7,191
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
109,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109,517
|
|
|
|
4,854
|
|
|
|
20,092
|
|
|
|
243,918
|
|
|
|
12,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494,955
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494,955
|
|
|
|
58,537
|
|
|
|
77,617
|
|
|
|
1,145,140
|
|
|
|
233,125
|
|
Real
Estate
|
|
|
|
|
9,268
|
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
|
|
10,707
|
|
|
|
3,922
|
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
|
|
31,472
|
|
|
|
7,628
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,011
|
)
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
241,158
|
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
|
(1,439
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
504,223
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
504,223
|
|
|
$
|
34,448
|
|
|
$
|
82,513
|
|
|
$
|
1,417,770
|
|
|
$
|
242,912
|
|
60
The following table reconciles segment operating income to income
before taxes and equity in income (loss) of affiliates as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income (in thousands).
Years Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Segment
operating income (loss)
|
|
|
|
$
|
179,206
|
|
|
$
|
(12,262
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,448
|
|
|
Other income
(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and
dividend income
|
|
|
|
|
5,809
|
|
|
|
1,965
|
|
|
|
2,467
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
|
|
(12,642
|
)
|
|
|
(12,695
|
)
|
|
|
(12,289
|
)
|
Gain on sale
of investment securities
|
|
|
|
|
26,969
|
|
|
|
25,418
|
|
|
|
5,529
|
|
Income from
asset sales
|
|
|
|
|
13,550
|
|
|
|
5,377
|
|
|
|
3,689
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
Total
unallocated amounts
|
|
|
|
|
33,451
|
|
|
|
20,262
|
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
Income before
income taxes and equity in income (loss) of affiliates
|
|
|
|
$
|
212,657
|
|
|
$
|
8,000
|
|
|
$
|
33,942
|
|
The following table presents revenues from external customers and
long-lived assets by country based on the location of service provided (in thousands).
Years Ended September
30,
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
|
|
$
|
623,246
|
|
|
$
|
440,268
|
|
|
$
|
394,706
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
66,824
|
|
|
|
56,297
|
|
|
|
31,816
|
|
Ecuador
|
|
|
|
|
60,946
|
|
|
|
43,363
|
|
|
|
50,463
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
|
|
12,792
|
|
|
|
3,698
|
|
|
|
6,062
|
|
Other
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
36,918
|
|
|
|
45,430
|
|
|
|
21,176
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
800,726
|
|
|
$
|
589,056
|
|
|
$
|
504,223
|
|
|
Long-Lived
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United
States
|
|
|
|
$
|
810,489
|
|
|
$
|
799,207
|
|
|
$
|
867,365
|
|
Venezuela
|
|
|
|
|
84,461
|
|
|
|
85,336
|
|
|
|
75,179
|
|
Ecuador
|
|
|
|
|
44,250
|
|
|
|
46,809
|
|
|
|
46,778
|
|
Colombia
|
|
|
|
|
9,213
|
|
|
|
9,336
|
|
|
|
12,984
|
|
Other
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
33,552
|
|
|
|
57,986
|
|
|
|
55,899
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
$
|
981,965
|
|
|
$
|
998,674
|
|
|
$
|
1,058,205
|
|
Long-lived assets are comprised of property, plant and
equipment.
Revenues from one company doing business with the contract
drilling segment accounted for approximately 11.1 percent, 11.4 percent, and 16.0 percent of the total operating revenues during the years ended
September 30, 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. Revenues from another company doing business with the contract drilling segment accounted for
approximately 8.7 percent, 11.3 percent, and 11.7 percent of total operating revenues in the years ended September 30, 2005, 2004, and 2003,
respectively. Revenues from a third company doing business with the contract drilling segment accounted for approximately 7.7 percent, 8.9 percent, and
14.9 percent of total operating revenues in the years ended September 30, 2005, 2004, and 2003, respectively. Collectively, the
61
receivables from these customers were approximately $38.5
million and $28.6 million at September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
NOTE 15 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
In October and November, 2005, the Company announced three-year
term contracts had been reached with five exploration and production companies to operate 20 new FlexRig4s and five new FlexRig3s. The rigs are
scheduled for delivery to the field beginning in the third quarter of fiscal 2006 through the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007. With these contracts, the
Company has now committed to build a total of 50 new FlexRigs.
On December 6, 2005, a cash dividend of $.0825 per share was
declared for shareholders of record on February 15, 2006, payable March 1, 2006.
On December 6, 2005, the Board of Directors approved Amendment
No. 1 to the Rights Agreement dated January 8, 1996. Among other things, Amendment No. 1 amends the Rights Agreement to extend the Final
Expiration Date of the Rights to January 31, 2016, and to increase the exercise price of the Rights to $250 per Right.
NOTE 16 SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA
(UNAUDITED)
(in thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
1
st
Quarter
|
|
2
nd
Quarter
|
|
3
rd
Quarter
|
|
4
th
Quarter
|
|
Operating
revenues
|
|
|
|
$
|
174,679
|
|
|
$
|
185,450
|
|
|
$
|
207,387
|
|
|
$
|
233,210
|
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
|
|
30,919
|
|
|
|
37,586
|
|
|
|
50,818
|
|
|
|
59,883
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
39,310
|
|
|
|
22,350
|
|
|
|
29,825
|
|
|
|
36,121
|
|
Basic net
income per common share
|
|
|
|
|
.78
|
|
|
|
.44
|
|
|
|
.58
|
|
|
|
.70
|
|
Diluted net income per common share
|
|
|
|
|
.77
|
|
|
|
.43
|
|
|
|
.57
|
|
|
|
.68
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
|
1
st
Quarter
|
|
2
nd
Quarter
|
|
3
rd
Quarter
|
|
4
th
Quarter
|
|
Operating
revenues
|
|
|
|
$
|
134,273
|
|
|
$
|
143,024
|
|
|
$
|
147,691
|
|
|
$
|
164,068
|
|
Asset
impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,516
|
|
Operating
income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
9,122
|
|
|
|
4,883
|
|
|
|
8,679
|
|
|
|
(34,946
|
)
|
Net income
(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
6,588
|
|
|
|
6,048
|
|
|
|
4,347
|
|
|
|
(12,624
|
)
|
Basic net
income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
.13
|
|
|
|
.12
|
|
|
|
.09
|
|
|
|
(.25
|
)
|
Diluted net income (loss) per common share
|
|
|
|
|
.13
|
|
|
|
.12
|
|
|
|
.09
|
|
|
|
(.25
|
)
|
The sum of earnings per share for the four quarters may not equal
the total earnings per share for the year due to changes in the average number of common shares outstanding.
62
In the first quarter of fiscal 2005, the net income includes an
after-tax gain on sale of available-for-sale securities of $16.0 million, $0.31 per share, on a diluted basis.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2005, the net income includes an
after-tax gain on sale of available for-sale securities of $.4 million, $0.01 per share, on a diluted basis.
In the first quarter of fiscal 2004, the net income includes a
non-monetary investment gain on the conversion of shares of common stock of a company investee pursuant to that investee being acquired of $1.2
million, $0.02 per share, on a diluted basis.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the net loss includes an
after-tax gain on sale of available-for-sale securities of $8.1 million, $0.16 per share, on a diluted basis.
In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004, the net loss includes an
after-tax asset impairment charge of approximately $32.0 million, $0.63 per share, on a diluted basis.
63
Directors
W. H. Helmerich, III
Chairman of the Board
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Hans Helmerich
President and Chief Executive Officer
Tulsa,
Oklahoma
William L. Armstrong**
(
***
)
Chairman
Cherry Creek Mortgage Company
Denver,
Colorado
Glenn A. Cox*
(
***
)
President and Chief Operating Officer, Retired Phillips Petroleum
Company
Bartlesville, Oklahoma
George S. Dotson
Vice President,
President of Helmerich & Payne
International Drilling Co.
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Paula Marshall-Chapman**
(
***
)
Chief Executive Officer, The Bama Companies, Inc., Tulsa,
Oklahoma
Edward B. Rust, Jr.*
(
***
)
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
State Farm Mutual
Automobile Insurance Company
Bloomington, Illinois
John D. Zeglis*
(
**
) (
***
)
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Retired AT&T Wireless
Services, Inc.
Basking Ridge, New Jersey
* Member, Audit Committee
** Member, Human Resources Committee
*** Member, Nominating and Corporate Governance
Committee
Officers
W. H. Helmerich, III
Chairman of the Board
Hans Helmerich
President and Chief Executive Officer
George S. Dotson
Vice President,
President of Helmerich & Payne
International Drilling Co.
Douglas E. Fears
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Steven R. Mackey
Vice President, Secretary,
and General
Counsel
Stockholders Meeting
The annual meeting of stockholders will be held on March 1, 2006.
A formal notice of the meeting, together with a proxy statement and form of proxy will be mailed to shareholders on or about January 26,
2006.
Stock Exchange Listing
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Common Stock is traded on the New
York Stock Exchange with the ticker symbol HP. The newspaper abbreviation most commonly used for financial reporting is HelmP.
Options on the Companys stock are also traded on the New York Stock Exchange.
Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar
As of December 5, 2005, there were 808 record holders of
Helmerich & Payne, Inc. common stock as listed by the transfer agents records.
Our Transfer Agent is responsible for our shareholder records,
issuance of stock certificates, and distribution of our dividends and the IRS Form 1099. Your requests, as shareholders, concerning these matters are
most efficiently answered by corresponding directly with The Transfer Agent at the following address:
|
|
UMB Bank
Security Transfer Division
928 Grand Blvd.,
13th Floor
Kansas City, MO 64106
Telephone: (800) 884-4225
(816) 860-5000
|
Available Information
Quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, earnings releases, and financial
statements are made available on the investor relations section of the Companys Web site. Also located on the investor relations section of the
Companys Web site are certain corporate governance documents, including the following: the charters of the committees of the Board of Directors;
the Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics; the Code of Ethics for Principal Executive Officer and
Senior Financial Officers; certain Audit Committee Practices and a description of the means by which employees and other interested persons may
communicate certain concerns to the Companys Board of Directors, including the communication of such concerns confidentially and anonymously via
the Companys ethics hotline at 1-800-205-4913. Quarterly reports, earnings releases, financial statements and the various corporate governance
documents are also available free of charge upon written request.
Annual CEO Certification
The annual CEO Certification required by Section 303A.12(a) of
the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual was provided to the New York Stock Exchange on or about March 22, 2005.
Direct Inquiries To:
Investor Relations
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
1437 South
Boulder Avenue
Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119
Telephone: (918) 742-5531
Internet Address: http://www.hpinc.com
64
Exhibit 21
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
|
Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
Subsidiaries of Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
White Eagle Assurance Company (Incorporated in Vermont)
|
|
Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co. (Incorporated in
|
|
Delaware)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co.
|
|
|
Helmerich & Payne (Africa) Drilling Co. (Incorporated
|
|
|
in Cayman Islands, British West Indies)
|
|
|
Helmerich & Payne (Colombia) Drilling Co. (Incorporated
|
|
|
in Oklahoma)
|
|
|
Helmerich & Payne (Gabon) Drilling Co. (Incorporated in
|
|
|
Cayman Islands, British West Indies)
|
|
|
Helmerich & Payne (Argentina) Drilling Co. (Incorporated
|
|
|
in Oklahoma)
|
|
|
Helmerich & Payne (Boulder) Drilling Co. (Incorporated in
|
|
|
Oklahoma)
|
|
|
Helmerich & Payne (Peru) Drilling Co., Sucursal del Peru,
|
|
|
Lima (Lima Branch - Incorporated in Peru)
|
|
|
Helmerich & Payne (Peru) Drilling Co., Sucursal del Peru
|
|
|
(Iquitos Branch - Incorporated in Peru)
|
|
|
Helmerich & Payne (Australia) Drilling Co. (Incorporated
|
|
|
in Oklahoma)
|
|
|
Helmerich & Payne del Ecuador, Inc. (Incorporated in
|
|
|
Oklahoma)
|
|
|
Helmerich & Payne de Venezuela, C.A. (Incorporated in
|
|
|
Venezuela)
|
|
|
Helmerich & Payne Rasco, Inc. (Incorporated in Oklahoma)
|
|
|
H&P Finco (Incorporated in Cayman Islands, British
|
|
|
West Indies)
|
|
|
H&P Invest Ltd. (Incorporated in Cayman Islands), British
|
|
|
West Indies, doing business as H&P (Yemen) Drilling Co.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiary of H&P Invest Ltd.
|
|
Turrum Pty. Ltd. (Incorporated in Papua, New Guinea)
|
|
|
|
|
The Space Center, Inc. (Incorporated in Oklahoma)
|
|
Helmerich & Payne Properties, Inc. (Incorporated in Oklahoma)
|
|
Utica Square Shopping Center, Inc. (Incorporated in Oklahoma)
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries of Utica Square Shopping Center, Inc.
|
|
Fishercorp, Inc. (Incorporated in Oklahoma)
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 23.1
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. of our report dated December 1, 2005, except for Note 15, as to which the date is December 7, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Helmerich & Payne, Inc., included in the 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders of Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration Statements:
(1)
|
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 33-55239) pertaining to the Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 1990 Stock Option Plan,
|
(2)
|
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-34939) pertaining to the Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan, and
|
(3)
|
Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-63124) pertaining to the Helmerich & Payne, Inc. 2000 Stock Incentive Plan;
|
of our report dated December 1, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. incorporated herein by reference, and our report dated December 1, 2005, with respect to Helmerich & Payne, Inc. managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Helmerich & Payne, Inc., included herein.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Tulsa, Oklahoma
December 9, 2005
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
I, Hans Helmerich, President and Chief Executive Officer of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (the Company), certify
that:
1.
|
|
I have reviewed this Report on Form 10-K of the
Company;
|
2.
|
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
|
The Companys other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and we have:
|
a)
|
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
|
b)
|
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
|
c)
|
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
|
d)
|
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
|
The Companys other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the Audit Committee of
the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
|
a)
|
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data information; and
|
b)
|
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
|
Date: December 13,
2005
/s/ Hans Helmerich
Hans Helmerich
President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
I, Douglas E. Fears, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (the Company), certify
that:
1.
|
|
I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of the
Company;
|
2.
|
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
|
3.
|
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
|
4.
|
|
The Companys other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and we have:
|
a)
|
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;
|
b)
|
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or
caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles;
|
c)
|
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
|
d)
|
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companys most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting; and
|
5.
|
|
The Companys other certifying officer and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Companys auditors and the Audit Committee of
the Companys Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
|
a)
|
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Companys ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data information; and
|
b)
|
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
|
Date: December 13,
2005
/s/ Douglas E. Fears
Douglas E. Fears
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32
Certification of CEO and CFO Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
In connection with the Annual Report of Helmerich & Payne,
Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), Hans Helmerich, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and Douglas E. Fears, as Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of his knowledge, that:
(1)
|
|
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a)
and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
(2)
|
|
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
|
/s/ Hans Helmerich
|
|
|
|
/s/ Douglas E. Fears
|
Hans
Helmerich
Chief Executive Officer
December 13, 2005
|
|
|
|
Douglas E. Fears
Chief Financial Officer
December 13, 2005
|