UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

 


 

FORM 8-K

 

CURRENT REPORT

 

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

Date of Report (Date of Earliest Event Reported):   February 7, 2012

 

HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

State of Incorporation:  Delaware

 

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-4221

 

Internal Revenue Service — Employer Identification No. 73-0679879

 

1437 South Boulder Avenue, Suite 1400, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74119

(918)742-5531

 

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

 

o             Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

 

o             Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

 

o             Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

 

o             Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

 

 

 



 

ITEM 7.01             REGULATION FD DISCLOSURE

 

Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (“H&P”) will discuss information to be distributed in an investor and securities analyst conference that includes the slides attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K, which are incorporated herein by reference.

 

This information is not “filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not incorporated by reference into any filing made pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  The furnishing of these slides is not intended to constitute a representation that such information is required by Regulation FD or that the materials they contain include material information that is not otherwise publicly available.

 

ITEM 9.01             FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

 

 

 

99.1

 

Slides to be distributed at an investor and securities analyst conference.

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly authorized the undersigned to sign this report on its behalf.

 

 

HELMERICH & PAYNE, INC.

 

(Registrant)

 

 

 

/S/ Steven R. Mackey

 

Steven R. Mackey

 

Executive Vice President

 

 

 

DATE: February 7, 2012

 

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description

 

 

 

99.1

 

Slides to be distributed at an investor and securities analyst conference.

 

2


Exhibit 99.1

 

GRAPHIC

Helmerich & Payne, Inc. Credit Suisse Energy Summit February 7-8, 2012

 


GRAPHIC

Statements within this presentation are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this release, including, without limitation, statements regarding the registrant’s future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected costs and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward looking statements. For information regarding risks and uncertainties associated with the Company’s business, please refer to the “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion & Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” sections of the Company’s SEC filings, including but not limited to, its annual report on Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. As a result of these factors, Helmerich & Payne, Inc.’s actual results may differ materially from those indicated or implied by such forward-looking statements. We undertake no duty to update or revise our forward-looking statements based on changes in internal estimates, expectations or otherwise, except as required by law. Forward-looking Statements

 


GRAPHIC

* Includes 40 announced new FlexRigs under construction with customer commitments as of January 31, 2012 that are scheduled for completion during fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013.

 


GRAPHIC

A Remarkable Transformation.

 


GRAPHIC

The U.S. Land Market Today Oil-directed drilling has been on a steady march up, while “dry” gas drilling has lost ground. Although the gas-directed count may accelerate its decline trend, the fallout should be partially or fully offset by displaced rigs being re-directed to oil and liquids-rich targets. The shift has been combined with the transition towards more complex well designs and higher performance rig requirements.

 


GRAPHIC

Increasing Focus on More Difficult Drilling

 


GRAPHIC

An Undersupply of AC Drive Rigs Note: The above estimates corresponding to rig activity are derived from multiple sources including Rig Data, Smith Bits, and corporate filings. (~1,850 Active Rigs in the U.S. By Power Type)

 


GRAPHIC

H&P’s Growing Exposure to Oil & Liquids Estimated proportion of H&P’s active U.S. Land rigs by primary hydrocarbon target. Less than 10% of H&P’s rigs are targeting dry gas in the spot market.

 


GRAPHIC

H&P’s Lead in U.S. Land AC Drive Rigs Note: The above estimates corresponding to U.S. lower 48 AC Drive fleets and new build commitments are derived from Rig Data and corporate filings.

 


GRAPHIC

The Replacement Cycle Continues AC drive rigs are best positioned to make the transition. Older, underperforming rigs are more likely to be sidelined. High efficiency rigs continue to displace mechanical and SCR rigs. H&P is fortunate to have a customer roster with substantial multi-year drilling inventory capable of shifting targets and taking advantage of strong oil prices.

 


GRAPHIC

H&P vs. Industry U.S. Land Customer Base Note: The above estimates corresponding to the active rig fleet in the U.S. are derived from multiple sources including Rig Data, Smith Bits, and corporate filings.

 


GRAPHIC

Organic U.S. Land Fleet Growth * Estimates include existing rigs and announced new build commitments. 299 49

 


GRAPHIC

As of January 25, 2002 Lower 48 U.S. Land Market Share Active Rig Market Share – Ten Years Ago Note: The above estimates corresponding to U.S. land rig market share are derived from Smith Bits S.T.A.T.S..

 


GRAPHIC

As of March 16, 2001 As of January 27, 2012 Lower 48 U.S. Land Market Share Organically Growing Active Rig Market Share Note: The above estimates corresponding to U.S. land rig market share are derived from Smith Bits S.T.A.T.S..

 


GRAPHIC

Highest U.S. Activity Level in Company History As of 1/31/12

 


GRAPHIC

Most Profitable Driller in U.S. Land Business * PTEN’s operating income includes drilling operations in Canada. ** NBR’s operating income corresponds to its U.S. Lower 48 Land Drilling segment.

 


GRAPHIC

Five-Year Relative Shareholder Return Source: Yahoo! Finance as of February 1, 2012

 


GRAPHIC

[LOGO]

 


GRAPHIC

Growing Shareholder Value Lead Innovation Drive Well Costs Down Satisfy Customers Expand Market Share

 


GRAPHIC

The FlexRig Difference: Key Advantages Increased drilling productivity and reliability Variable frequency (AC) drives with increased precision and measurability Computerized electronic driller that more precisely controls weight on bit, rotation and pressure Designed to move quickly from well to well Accelerated well programs and NPV gains A significantly enhanced and safer workplace Minimized impact to the environment Total well cost savings even at premium dayrates H&P’s FlexRig Advantage

 


GRAPHIC

Innovation & Applied Technology AC Driven Systems & Integrated Top Drive Mechanized Tubular Handling Computerized Controls BOP Handling Driller’s Cabin Satellite Communications Rig Move Capabilities

 


GRAPHIC

Technology & Quality Service Make a Difference * Does not include the impact of early contract termination revenue. ** Represents weighted-average rig margin per day for PTEN, NBR and UNT through Q3CY11. H&P’s Margin Premium

 


GRAPHIC

Technology & Quality Service Make a Difference * Utilization is herein calculated to be average active rigs divided by estimated available marketable rigs during the period. ** Represents estimated average combined utilization for PTEN, NBR and UNT in the Lower 48 through Q3CY11. H&P’s Utilization Premium

 


GRAPHIC

Activity as of January 31, 2012 Rigs Working/ Contracted 236 7 22 265 40 305 Rigs Available 259 9 26 294 40 334 % Contracted 91% 78% 85% 90% U.S. Land Offshore International Land Total FlexRig Construction Total Fleet * * Includes new FlexRig commitments announced through January 31, 2012.

 


GRAPHIC

H&P Global Fleet Under Term Contract

 


GRAPHIC

Unconventional Plays Shaping Landscape Well Complexity is increasing: Technology solutions that provide safe, environmentally sound and efficient operations are required by contractors to be competitive Extended reach laterals progressively longer Multi-well pad drilling gaining acceptance in more areas A factory approach to drilling wells is required This all creates an expanding level of demand for FlexRigs

 


GRAPHIC

 (276 H&P Contracted Land Rigs as of 1/31/12*) Leading U.S. Unconventional Driller * Includes announced new FlexRigs with customer commitments scheduled for completion in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013.

 


GRAPHIC

H&P’s New Build Advantages We have been improving and honing the process for over 10 years, prompting our assertion that we build a better rig for less Safety is our first priority, followed by a relentless focus on strong execution and performance in the field Exceptional fleet uniformity Extensive collaboration with customers and suppliers A strong organizational orientation to consistent, repeatable, field execution

 


GRAPHIC

H&P New Builds Total of 74 new builds announced over the past 13 months Delivering new FlexRigs at the rate of four per month As of January 31, 2012, 40 announced new builds left to deliver in fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2013 Encouraging conversations with customers continue regarding additional new build commitments

 


GRAPHIC

A Few Performance Metrics on FlexRigs Over the last 13 months we have completed and deployed 43 new FlexRigs on time and on budget. These 40 newly commissioned FlexRigs were able to deliver safety performance during the first year of operation at a rate approximately two times better than the industry average. FlexRig productivity continues to improve, even as drilling complexity and well depths increase. From 2007 to 2011, H&P’s U.S. land fleet experienced the following: Increase in % of directional or horizontal drilling: 42% (62% to 88%) Increase in average well depth: 35% Increase in productivity (average feet per day): 38%

 


GRAPHIC

Performance is Not Only About Better Rigs It’s also about: People Safety Experience Training Culture Support Structure Processes Organizational Network Maintenance Supply Chain

 


GRAPHIC

End of Presentation

 


GRAPHIC

Additional References

 


GRAPHIC

H&P’s U.S. Land Operations Driven primarily by incremental new builds, we expect total revenue days in the U.S. land segment to increase between two and three percent from the first to the second fiscal quarter of 2012. Quarterly average rig revenue per day is expected to improve slightly, by up to $200 per day excluding expenses that are passed through to customers from the first to the second fiscal quarter of 2012. In the second fiscal quarter of 2012, we expect the base level of average rig expense per day to return to a $12,700 per day range, excluding any expenses that are passed through to customers. Additionally, we expect wages in the second fiscal quarter to increase by approximately $500 per day. Wage increases are passed through to customers and are expected to impact expense and revenue per day in equal amounts.

 


GRAPHIC

H&P’s U.S. Land Fleet Activity (1) Active rigs on term (in blue) generated both revenue and revenue days. (2) Includes completed new builds that were waiting on operators and which generated revenue but did not generate revenue days. (3) The number of active rigs as of 1/31/2012 includes two contracted rigs in transition from project to project and soon to be generating revenue days. (1) (2) (3)

 


GRAPHIC

H&P’s Offshore Operations Seven of the Company’s nine offshore platform rigs remain active, including two under long-term contracts. The Trinidad rig is returning to the U.S. and is expected to stack at the end of the second fiscal quarter. The number of revenue days during the second fiscal quarter of 2012 is expected to decrease by approximately ten percent as compared to the first fiscal quarter of 2012. Average rig margin per day is expected to decrease by ten to 15 percent during the second fiscal quarter of 2012 as compared to the first fiscal quarter.

 


GRAPHIC

H&P’s International Land Operations Of the 26 rigs assigned to international operations, 20 are currently active and an additional two are contracted and in transit to new projects. Total revenue days during the second fiscal quarter are expected to be roughly flat from the first fiscal quarter of 2012. Average rig margin per day is expected to decrease by ten to 15 percent during the second fiscal quarter of 2012 as compared to the first fiscal quarter.

 


GRAPHIC

H&P’s International Land Operations Active Contracted Idle Total Long-term Contracts Argentina 5 3 8 4 Bahrain 4 4 4 Colombia 5 1 1 7 2 Ecuador 4 1 5 Tunisia 2 2 Total 20 2 4 26 10 Rig Fleet Status (as of January 31, 2011) (1) Contracted rig is currently in transit to Colombia from Argentina. (2) Contracted rig is currently in transit to Ecuador from Colombia. (3) 10 of 13 FlexRigs, included in the international fleet of 26 rigs, are under long-term contracts. (3) (1) (2)

 


GRAPHIC

Oil Related Drilling Increasingly Complex

 


GRAPHIC

Increasing Focus on More Difficult Drilling

 


GRAPHIC

Economics Shift Activity Towards Oil Drilling

 


GRAPHIC

H&P U.S. Land Fleet by Power Type* * Includes New Build Commitments.

 


GRAPHIC

Total Industry Available U.S. Land Fleet (by Power Type) Note: The above estimates corresponding to the available rig fleet in the U.S. are derived from multiple sources including Rig Data, Smith Bits, and corporate filings.

 


GRAPHIC

[LOGO]

 


GRAPHIC

How Does H&P Define a “New Build” Land Rig? A new build rig consists of all new structures and equipment for the purpose of: Eliminating legacy issues Achieving Safety-by-Design Maximizing drilling efficiency Improvement of ergonomics for rig site personnel Packaging of components for enhanced mobility

 


GRAPHIC

Lean Manufacturing New Electrical Systems Test Assembly and Outfitting Unitizing Packages Fabricating New Structures Processing Raw Materials Building a New FlexRig Commissioning / Delivery

 


GRAPHIC

Driller on a Conventional Rig vs. FlexRig™

 


GRAPHIC

Roughnecks on a Conventional Rig vs. FlexRig™

 


GRAPHIC

A Value Proposition Example – H&P vs. Competitors Estimated Estimated Peer H&P FlexRig3 Conventional Fit-for-purpose Average Average Average 2011 (Spot Market) (Spot Market) (Spot Market) 1. Drilling days 20 11 9 Other days 3 3 3 Moving days 7 5 3.5 Total rig revenue days per well 30 19 15.5 2. Drilling contractor dayrate $17,500 $23,000 $26,000 Operator’s other intangible $25,000 $25,000 $25,000 cost per day estimate Total daily cost estimate $42,500 $48,000 $51,000 Total cost per well (daily services) $1,275,000 $912,000 $790,500 3. Total well savings with H&P – per well $484,500 $121,500 per year $11.4MM $2.9MM Increased wells per rig per year versus conventional average: 11 wells Increased wells per rig per year versus peer fit-for-purpose: 4 wells

 


GRAPHIC

FlexRig3 – Performance Sample Note: Information from third party well database provider FlexRig3 Bakken Shale

 


GRAPHIC

FlexRig3 Eagle Ford Shale FlexRig3 – Performance Sample Note: Information from third party well database provider

 


GRAPHIC

FlexRig3 Cana Woodford Shale FlexRig3 – Performance Sample Note: Information from third party well database provider

 


GRAPHIC

FlexRig4 Permian Basin FlexRig4 – Performance Sample Note: Information from third party well database provider

 


GRAPHIC

Delivering Safety – H&P vs. Industry (IADC) U.S. Land Safety Performance (1994 – 2011) OSHA Recordable Injury Incidence Rates H&P 2011 = 1.15 IADC 3Q11 = 3.09

 


GRAPHIC

Safety Excellence Also Generates Savings Reduced Workers Comp and General Liability Losses per Man Hour EMR = Experience Modifier Ratio (Industry Average = 1.00)

 


GRAPHIC

End of Document